Social Factors and the Risk of Postpartum Depression during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.31083/j.ceog5010203
Haohui Chen, Bo Feng, Yuting Guo, Wei Luo, Yuxin Zhao, Shuying Liao, Jitong Zhao
{"title":"Social Factors and the Risk of Postpartum Depression during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review","authors":"Haohui Chen, Bo Feng, Yuting Guo, Wei Luo, Yuxin Zhao, Shuying Liao, Jitong Zhao","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5010203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To investigate the effects of social factors including social support and social restriction on postpartum depression (PPD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a systematic review with PubMed and Web of Science from 1 January 2020 to 1 April 2023. Articles focusing on social factors and PPD during COVID-19 pandemic were investigated. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale were used to evaluate quality of literatures. Results: We included 31 articles (22 cross-sectional studies and 9 cohort studies) with good quality. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used as the preferred measure for defining PPD. Social support reduced the prevalence of developing PPD by 30%–40%. Social restriction increased the risk of PPD but there was lack of evidence or effective scales to define restriction. Conclusions: We found that social support acted as an important protective factor for PPD during the COVID-19 pandemic and that social restriction increased the risk of PPD. EPDS may be an optimal choice for researchers to define PPD. Obstetricians should underline social factors for both pregnancy women and their families. The study was registered on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), registration number: CRD42023434485.","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5010203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the effects of social factors including social support and social restriction on postpartum depression (PPD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a systematic review with PubMed and Web of Science from 1 January 2020 to 1 April 2023. Articles focusing on social factors and PPD during COVID-19 pandemic were investigated. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale were used to evaluate quality of literatures. Results: We included 31 articles (22 cross-sectional studies and 9 cohort studies) with good quality. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used as the preferred measure for defining PPD. Social support reduced the prevalence of developing PPD by 30%–40%. Social restriction increased the risk of PPD but there was lack of evidence or effective scales to define restriction. Conclusions: We found that social support acted as an important protective factor for PPD during the COVID-19 pandemic and that social restriction increased the risk of PPD. EPDS may be an optimal choice for researchers to define PPD. Obstetricians should underline social factors for both pregnancy women and their families. The study was registered on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), registration number: CRD42023434485.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间社会因素与产后抑郁风险的系统评价
背景:探讨新冠肺炎大流行期间社会支持和社会限制等社会因素对产后抑郁的影响。方法:我们在2020年1月1日至2023年4月1日期间对PubMed和Web of Science进行了系统评价。对COVID-19大流行期间关注社会因素和PPD的文章进行了调查。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和卫生保健研究机构质量量表评价文献质量。结果:我们纳入了31篇质量较好的文章(22篇横断面研究和9篇队列研究)。爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)被用作确定产后抑郁的首选测量标准。社会支持使产后抑郁症患病率降低了30%-40%。社会限制增加了PPD的风险,但缺乏证据或有效的量表来定义限制。结论:我们发现社会支持是COVID-19大流行期间PPD的重要保护因素,社会限制增加了PPD的风险。EPDS可能是研究人员定义PPD的最佳选择。产科医生应强调孕妇及其家庭的社会因素。本研究已在PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/)上注册,注册号:CRD42023434485。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Maternal Deaths in Kayseri: Causes and Risk Factors The Relationship between Nifedipine and Postpartum Blood Loss in Patients with Preterm Labor Add-Back and Combined Regulation in GnRH-a Treatment of Endometriosis The Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Procedures in Contemporary Gynecology: An Appraisal of the Published Evidence and a Review A Retrospective Study Comparing of Group B Streptococcus Invasiveness in Pregnant Women and Infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1