{"title":"Capitalism, Sovereignty, and Planning in Hugh Dalton’s Interwar International Thought","authors":"Nick Kaderbhai","doi":"10.1080/07075332.2023.2265375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the international thought of Hugh Dalton during the interwar period. Perhaps best known as Clement Attlee’s first Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1945–47, Dalton was a thirty year veteran of the Parliamentary Labour Party, and influential member of the Party’s National Executive Council. Dalton’s influence on the conceptualisation of foreign policy and international order has been underappreciated, and thus remains underdeveloped in the literature. This article argues that while initially agreeing with his liberal internationalist colleagues on the need to prevent international disorder through international institutions, Dalton’s evolving understanding of his own social democratic political philosophy ultimately led to a change in emphasis. Liberal internationalists failed to consider the causes of disorder in the first place, namely the excesses of capitalism and national sovereignty, Dalton argued. Only by addressing these fundamentals, and reconstructing societies along social democratic lines at home, could inter- and eventually supranational institutions and organisations be created to build a functioning order internationally. Filling this gap in the literature vis-a-vis Dalton’s intellectual contribution to the problems of international order further develops the idea of an interwar ‘British social democratic internationalism’ that while previously hinted at it in the literature, has not been fully developed.","PeriodicalId":46534,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2023.2265375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article analyses the international thought of Hugh Dalton during the interwar period. Perhaps best known as Clement Attlee’s first Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1945–47, Dalton was a thirty year veteran of the Parliamentary Labour Party, and influential member of the Party’s National Executive Council. Dalton’s influence on the conceptualisation of foreign policy and international order has been underappreciated, and thus remains underdeveloped in the literature. This article argues that while initially agreeing with his liberal internationalist colleagues on the need to prevent international disorder through international institutions, Dalton’s evolving understanding of his own social democratic political philosophy ultimately led to a change in emphasis. Liberal internationalists failed to consider the causes of disorder in the first place, namely the excesses of capitalism and national sovereignty, Dalton argued. Only by addressing these fundamentals, and reconstructing societies along social democratic lines at home, could inter- and eventually supranational institutions and organisations be created to build a functioning order internationally. Filling this gap in the literature vis-a-vis Dalton’s intellectual contribution to the problems of international order further develops the idea of an interwar ‘British social democratic internationalism’ that while previously hinted at it in the literature, has not been fully developed.
期刊介绍:
The International History Review is the only English-language quarterly devoted entirely to the history of international relations and the history of international thought. Since 1979 the Review has established itself as one of the premier History journals in the world, read and regularly cited by both political scientists and historians. The Review serves as a bridge between historical research and the study of international relations. The Review publishes articles exploring the history of international relations and the history of international thought. The editors particularly welcome submissions that explore the history of current conflicts and conflicts of current interest; the development of international thought; diplomatic history.