Sustainability and professional sales: a review and future research agenda

Colin B. Gabler, V. Myles Landers, Omar S. Itani
{"title":"Sustainability and professional sales: a review and future research agenda","authors":"Colin B. Gabler, V. Myles Landers, Omar S. Itani","doi":"10.1080/08853134.2023.2244675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractSustainability has become a consideration for every firm operating in today’s business landscape. Scholars are tasked with uncovering bridges and barriers to successfully implement sustainability strategies, and the academic community has largely responded. However, while sustainability research has proliferated across business disciplines, it is conspicuously missing from professional selling and sales management. This is partly due to conceptual ambiguity, but also because sustainability generally involves firm-level policies and programs, and therefore domains like consumer behavior, marketing strategy, and supply chain management have occupied the space. This is problematic because while executives develop sustainability strategies, the sales force is responsible for conveying those priorities to external stakeholders. Therefore, the goals of our manuscript are to: 1) organize and refine the definition of sustainability in a professional selling context, 2) review relevant literature that examines sustainability in that context, 3) explore emergent themes from this review that 4) reveal gaps in our understanding, and 5) present a research agenda for sales scholars to bridge these gaps and advance our understanding of the role of sustainability in sales and vice versa.Keywords: sustainabilityenvironmental orientationcorporate social responsibilitytriple bottom linesalespeoplestakeholders Notes1 It is important to note that industry dynamics, environmental factors, cultural differences, political circumstances, and other factors outside of a firm’s control can influence these strategies. Further, firms can move up (or down) the pyramid as their motivations change or in response to changing customer expectations. For instance, Unilever is consistently ranked as a top sustainability brand. We discuss their Sustainable Living Plan strategy because it aligned with the bottom level of the hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":16697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2023.2244675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractSustainability has become a consideration for every firm operating in today’s business landscape. Scholars are tasked with uncovering bridges and barriers to successfully implement sustainability strategies, and the academic community has largely responded. However, while sustainability research has proliferated across business disciplines, it is conspicuously missing from professional selling and sales management. This is partly due to conceptual ambiguity, but also because sustainability generally involves firm-level policies and programs, and therefore domains like consumer behavior, marketing strategy, and supply chain management have occupied the space. This is problematic because while executives develop sustainability strategies, the sales force is responsible for conveying those priorities to external stakeholders. Therefore, the goals of our manuscript are to: 1) organize and refine the definition of sustainability in a professional selling context, 2) review relevant literature that examines sustainability in that context, 3) explore emergent themes from this review that 4) reveal gaps in our understanding, and 5) present a research agenda for sales scholars to bridge these gaps and advance our understanding of the role of sustainability in sales and vice versa.Keywords: sustainabilityenvironmental orientationcorporate social responsibilitytriple bottom linesalespeoplestakeholders Notes1 It is important to note that industry dynamics, environmental factors, cultural differences, political circumstances, and other factors outside of a firm’s control can influence these strategies. Further, firms can move up (or down) the pyramid as their motivations change or in response to changing customer expectations. For instance, Unilever is consistently ranked as a top sustainability brand. We discuss their Sustainable Living Plan strategy because it aligned with the bottom level of the hierarchy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续发展与专业销售:回顾与未来研究议程
摘要可持续发展已成为当今商业环境中每个公司经营的考虑因素。学者们的任务是发现成功实施可持续发展战略的桥梁和障碍,学术界在很大程度上做出了回应。然而,尽管可持续性研究在商业学科中激增,但在专业销售和销售管理中却明显缺失。这部分是由于概念上的模糊性,但也因为可持续性通常涉及公司层面的政策和计划,因此消费者行为、营销策略和供应链管理等领域占据了空间。这是有问题的,因为当高管们制定可持续发展战略时,销售团队负责向外部利益相关者传达这些优先事项。因此,我们手稿的目标是:1)在专业销售背景下组织和完善可持续性的定义,2)回顾在该背景下研究可持续性的相关文献,3)探索从本综述中出现的主题,4)揭示我们理解中的差距,5)为销售学者提供研究议程,以弥合这些差距,促进我们对可持续性在销售中的作用的理解,反之亦然。关键字:可持续发展、环境导向、企业社会责任、三重底线、销售人员、利益相关者注1值得注意的是,行业动态、环境因素、文化差异、政治环境和公司控制之外的其他因素都会影响这些战略。此外,随着企业动机的改变或客户期望的变化,企业可以在金字塔中向上(或向下)移动。例如,联合利华一直被评为可持续发展的顶级品牌。我们讨论他们的可持续生活计划策略,因为它符合底层的层次结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personal selling and sales management abstracts Frontline ambidexterity: a systematic review and future research agenda Sales technology research: a review and future research agenda Social media in response to COVID-19: how increased social media usage affects the performance of B2B salespeople in the “new normal” Team selling: a review, implications, and an agenda for sales team research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1