LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.22190/jtesap230508030s

Sunanda M Shinde, Mahesh B Shinde

{"title":"LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS","authors":"Sunanda M Shinde, Mahesh B Shinde","doi":"10.22190/jtesap230508030s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to investigate the use of language learning strategies (LLS) by undergraduate students, the degree of use of language learning strategy included in the Oxford Taxonomy, and the relationship between the use of language learning strategies and English language proficiency. One hundred and forty-eight arts, commerce, science undergraduate students studying at various colleges affiliated to Shivaji University were the participants of the study. The results indicated that these students used LLS moderately to less; meta-cognitive strategies, social strategies, cognitive strategies, and memory strategies moderately; and compensation strategies and affective strategies were used less. The same correlation was found between the use of language learning strategies and English proficiency, which was indicated by students’ grades in proficiency tests. Overall, the results demonstrate that the use of language learning strategies used by the selected students varies depending upon the proficiency level. It was observed that less proficient students used fewer strategies and proficient students used them more.","PeriodicalId":42098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap230508030s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the use of language learning strategies (LLS) by undergraduate students, the degree of use of language learning strategy included in the Oxford Taxonomy, and the relationship between the use of language learning strategies and English language proficiency. One hundred and forty-eight arts, commerce, science undergraduate students studying at various colleges affiliated to Shivaji University were the participants of the study. The results indicated that these students used LLS moderately to less; meta-cognitive strategies, social strategies, cognitive strategies, and memory strategies moderately; and compensation strategies and affective strategies were used less. The same correlation was found between the use of language learning strategies and English proficiency, which was indicated by students’ grades in proficiency tests. Overall, the results demonstrate that the use of language learning strategies used by the selected students varies depending upon the proficiency level. It was observed that less proficient students used fewer strategies and proficient students used them more.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

shivaji大学本科生的语言学习策略与英语水平

本研究旨在调查大学生语言学习策略的使用情况、牛津语言分类中语言学习策略的使用程度，以及语言学习策略的使用与英语语言能力的关系。在希瓦吉大学附属各学院学习的148名艺术、商业、科学本科学生参与了这项研究。结果表明:这些学生使用LLS的次数为中低;元认知策略、社会策略、认知策略和记忆策略适度;补偿策略和情感策略的使用较少。语言学习策略的使用与英语水平之间也存在同样的相关性，这可以通过学生在英语水平测试中的成绩来证明。总体而言，结果表明，所选学生使用的语言学习策略因熟练程度而异。我们观察到，不熟练的学生使用较少的策略，熟练的学生使用更多的策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

57.10%

发文量