A Laboratory Study of the Effect of pH on Solubility of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Composites

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1177/23202068231199028
Farnaz Farahat, Abbas Ali Jafari, Tayebe Sadat Baghaee Ardakani, Shima Sadat Shojasadati
{"title":"A Laboratory Study of the Effect of pH on Solubility of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Composites","authors":"Farnaz Farahat, Abbas Ali Jafari, Tayebe Sadat Baghaee Ardakani, Shima Sadat Shojasadati","doi":"10.1177/23202068231199028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Factors such as the low pH of acidic foods and beverages can affect long-term clinical success of restorative materials in the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to compare the solubility of Bulk-fill and Conventional Nano-Hybrid Resin Based Composites (RBCs) in different solutions. Material and Methods: A total of 60 cylindrical specimens were prepared from two RBCs (Tetric N-Ceram, Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill) and their constant weight was measured. The specimens were divided into six groups ( N = 10) in accordance with RBC type and pH solution (solution 1, 2, 3 with pH = 2.5, 5, 7, respectively), and were immersed in desired solutions for 30 days. Then they were weighed again and solubility levels of the specimens were calculated according to ISO 4049. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA. The test power was considered at 80%. Results: The type of RBC had no significant effect on solubility; while the effect of PH was significant. Solution 1 caused significantly the highest solubility. No statistically significant differences were found among other groups. Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the laboratory investigations, it was concluded that solubility rate of Bulk-fill and Conventional RBCs was higher in solutions with lower pH. There was no difference among the RBCs. However, the solubility rates of all groups are within the clinically normal range.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068231199028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Factors such as the low pH of acidic foods and beverages can affect long-term clinical success of restorative materials in the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to compare the solubility of Bulk-fill and Conventional Nano-Hybrid Resin Based Composites (RBCs) in different solutions. Material and Methods: A total of 60 cylindrical specimens were prepared from two RBCs (Tetric N-Ceram, Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill) and their constant weight was measured. The specimens were divided into six groups ( N = 10) in accordance with RBC type and pH solution (solution 1, 2, 3 with pH = 2.5, 5, 7, respectively), and were immersed in desired solutions for 30 days. Then they were weighed again and solubility levels of the specimens were calculated according to ISO 4049. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA. The test power was considered at 80%. Results: The type of RBC had no significant effect on solubility; while the effect of PH was significant. Solution 1 caused significantly the highest solubility. No statistically significant differences were found among other groups. Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the laboratory investigations, it was concluded that solubility rate of Bulk-fill and Conventional RBCs was higher in solutions with lower pH. There was no difference among the RBCs. However, the solubility rates of all groups are within the clinically normal range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pH值对填充型和常规复合材料溶解度影响的实验室研究
目的:酸性食品和饮料的低pH值等因素会影响口腔修复材料的长期临床成功。本研究的目的是比较大块填充和常规纳米复合树脂基复合材料(rbc)在不同溶液中的溶解度。材料与方法:用两种红细胞(N-Ceram和N-Ceram本体填充)制备60个圆柱形试样,测量其恒重。根据红细胞类型和pH溶液(溶液1、溶液2、溶液3,pH分别为2.5、5、7)将标本分为6组(N = 10),分别浸泡在相应的溶液中30 d。然后再次称重,并根据ISO 4049计算样品的溶解度。数据采用双因素方差分析。试验功率为80%。结果:红细胞类型对溶解度无显著影响;PH值的影响显著。溶液1的溶解度最高。其他组间无统计学差异。结论:考虑到实验室研究的局限性,在较低ph的溶液中,填充型红细胞和常规红细胞的溶解度更高,两者之间没有差异。但各组溶解度均在临床正常范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Radiographic Outcomes of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) with and Without Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) In Direct Pulp Capping: A Clinical Pilot Study Mineralized Collagen Fiber-based Dental Implant: Novel Perspectives Do Polishing Methods and Colorant Beverages Affect the Color Stainability of 3D-printed Permanent Restorations? The Intraoral Findings of the Patient with Robinow Syndrome and the Related Dental Treatment Approaches: A Case Report Effect of Bleaching on the Microhardness and Modulus of Elasticity of ACTIVA BioACTIVE – RESTORATIVE: An In Vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1