The Bee and Its Honey

Risto Saarinen
{"title":"The Bee and Its Honey","authors":"Risto Saarinen","doi":"10.1177/10638512231205227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the book of Richard Cross, Communicatio idiomatum: Reformation Christological Debates (Oxford University Press 2019). It basically agrees with Cross's view that Martin Luther develops a new variant of the medieval theory of suppositional union in his Christology. The paper argues that the view put forward by Cross has consequences for the soteriological role of human body. While “Christ present in faith” is a corporeal and supernatural gift, it may not be an instance of deification in the sense that human beings could sustain divine properties. Another issue concerns the sense in which Christ can be called a human “person” in Cross's view. As Christ carries a specific instance of human nature which in turn carries a particular instance of corporeality, one could claim that Christ as human being has a particular personalitas. This view resembles the trajectory of “patristic philosophy,” as recently argued by Johannes Zachhuber.","PeriodicalId":493571,"journal":{"name":"Pro ecclesia","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro ecclesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512231205227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the book of Richard Cross, Communicatio idiomatum: Reformation Christological Debates (Oxford University Press 2019). It basically agrees with Cross's view that Martin Luther develops a new variant of the medieval theory of suppositional union in his Christology. The paper argues that the view put forward by Cross has consequences for the soteriological role of human body. While “Christ present in faith” is a corporeal and supernatural gift, it may not be an instance of deification in the sense that human beings could sustain divine properties. Another issue concerns the sense in which Christ can be called a human “person” in Cross's view. As Christ carries a specific instance of human nature which in turn carries a particular instance of corporeality, one could claim that Christ as human being has a particular personalitas. This view resembles the trajectory of “patristic philosophy,” as recently argued by Johannes Zachhuber.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜜蜂和它的蜜
本文讨论了理查德·克罗斯的书,《通信惯用法:改革基督论辩论》(牛津大学出版社2019年)。它基本上同意克罗斯的观点,即马丁·路德在他的基督论中发展了中世纪假想结合理论的新变体。本文认为,克罗斯的观点对人体的救赎作用有一定的影响。虽然“基督在信心中显现”是一种物质和超自然的礼物,但它可能不是一个神化的例子,因为人类可以维持神的属性。另一个问题是,在十字架看来,基督可以被称为人的“位格”。因为基督带有人性的特定实例,而人性又带有肉体的特定实例,所以我们可以说,基督作为人,具有特定的人格。这种观点类似于约翰内斯·扎库伯最近提出的“教父哲学”的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The Medieval Luther by Christine Helmer The Bee and Its Honey Does the Body Keep the Score After the Game Is Over? Personal Identity and Perfection in the Resurrected Body Book Review: Joseph Ratzinger and the Healing of the Reformation-Era Divisions by Emery de Gaal and Matthew Levering Book Review: The Accountable Animal: Justice, Justification, and Judgment by Brendan Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1