Safety and Immunogenicity of Meningococcal Groups A and C Polysaccharide Vaccine in Adults 18–60 years of age

V. V. Romanenko, B. I. Kuzubov, N. A. Tsukanova, A. A. Kotova
{"title":"Safety and Immunogenicity of Meningococcal Groups A and C Polysaccharide Vaccine in Adults 18–60 years of age","authors":"V. V. Romanenko, B. I. Kuzubov, N. A. Tsukanova, A. A. Kotova","doi":"10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-5-81-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance . In the Russian Federation, despite the low incidence rate in 2020–2021, there are subjects where the incidence rate of meningococcal infection (MI) exceeds the national average by 2–9 times. MI often becomes fulminant with an extremely rapid development of symptoms up to infectious and toxic shock, which limits the possibility of providing specialized care. Less than 24 hours may pass between the appearance of the first symptoms (nonspecific, similar to ARVI) and the development of shock with a fatal outcome. To date, the most reliable way to protect against meningococcal infection is vaccination. However, the healthcare system until 2022 could use only one domestic vaccine with one serogroup A. Aims . To study the safety, reactogenicity and immunological efficacy of Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine, manufactured by Microgen, Russia, when used in persons aged 18 to 60 years. Materials and methods . The study included 100 people aged 18–60 years who met the inclusion criteria, the average age of the participants was 31.09 ±1.13 years. All study participants were evenly divided into two groups. The Meningo A+C® vaccine, Sanofi Pasteur, France (hereinafter referred to as MPV2 AC) was used as a comparison. PHA study was carried out using the test system «A set of diagnostic reagents for erythrocyte meningococcal polysaccharide groups A, B, C liquid according to TS 9388-004-68925985-10» manufactured by Bio-Diagnostics LLC, Russia (registration certificate No. FSR 2011/11185 dated 17.10.2011). Results and discussion . The results of the study assessing the reactogenicity and safety of the vaccine: in the first 7 days after vaccination, reactions were registered in 12.0% (95% CI: 5.62–23.80%) vaccinated with Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine, and in 10.0% (95% CI: 4.35–21.36%) in the comparison group, vaccinated with MPV2 AS. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). Results of the study assessing the immunogenicity: on the 28 th day after single-dose immunization of the participants of the clinical trial, both in the group vaccinated with Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine, and in the control group (vaccinated with MPV2 AC), a statistically significant increase in antibody titer was noted, p ≤ 0.001: 76.0% (95% CI: 62.59–85.70%) versus 74.0% (95% CI: 60.45–84.13%) in the control group, χ2 =0.0533 and p=0.818.. Conclusions. Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine is characterized by safety, low reactogenicity and high immunogenicity comparable to the MPV2 AC vaccine.","PeriodicalId":36064,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-5-81-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance . In the Russian Federation, despite the low incidence rate in 2020–2021, there are subjects where the incidence rate of meningococcal infection (MI) exceeds the national average by 2–9 times. MI often becomes fulminant with an extremely rapid development of symptoms up to infectious and toxic shock, which limits the possibility of providing specialized care. Less than 24 hours may pass between the appearance of the first symptoms (nonspecific, similar to ARVI) and the development of shock with a fatal outcome. To date, the most reliable way to protect against meningococcal infection is vaccination. However, the healthcare system until 2022 could use only one domestic vaccine with one serogroup A. Aims . To study the safety, reactogenicity and immunological efficacy of Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine, manufactured by Microgen, Russia, when used in persons aged 18 to 60 years. Materials and methods . The study included 100 people aged 18–60 years who met the inclusion criteria, the average age of the participants was 31.09 ±1.13 years. All study participants were evenly divided into two groups. The Meningo A+C® vaccine, Sanofi Pasteur, France (hereinafter referred to as MPV2 AC) was used as a comparison. PHA study was carried out using the test system «A set of diagnostic reagents for erythrocyte meningococcal polysaccharide groups A, B, C liquid according to TS 9388-004-68925985-10» manufactured by Bio-Diagnostics LLC, Russia (registration certificate No. FSR 2011/11185 dated 17.10.2011). Results and discussion . The results of the study assessing the reactogenicity and safety of the vaccine: in the first 7 days after vaccination, reactions were registered in 12.0% (95% CI: 5.62–23.80%) vaccinated with Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine, and in 10.0% (95% CI: 4.35–21.36%) in the comparison group, vaccinated with MPV2 AS. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). Results of the study assessing the immunogenicity: on the 28 th day after single-dose immunization of the participants of the clinical trial, both in the group vaccinated with Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine, and in the control group (vaccinated with MPV2 AC), a statistically significant increase in antibody titer was noted, p ≤ 0.001: 76.0% (95% CI: 62.59–85.70%) versus 74.0% (95% CI: 60.45–84.13%) in the control group, χ2 =0.0533 and p=0.818.. Conclusions. Meningococcal A+C polysaccharide vaccine is characterized by safety, low reactogenicity and high immunogenicity comparable to the MPV2 AC vaccine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18-60岁成人A群和C群脑膜炎球菌多糖疫苗的安全性和免疫原性
的相关性。在俄罗斯联邦,尽管2020-2021年发病率较低,但仍有一些国家的脑膜炎球菌感染发病率超过全国平均水平2-9倍。心肌梗死常以极快的症状发展为暴发性,直至感染性和中毒性休克,这限制了提供专门护理的可能性。从出现首次症状(非特异性,类似ARVI)到发展为休克并导致死亡的时间可能不到24小时。迄今为止,预防脑膜炎球菌感染最可靠的方法是接种疫苗。然而,直到2022年,卫生保健系统只能使用一种具有一种血清a组Aims的国产疫苗。目的:研究俄罗斯Microgen公司生产的脑膜炎球菌A+C多糖疫苗在18 ~ 60岁人群中的安全性、反应原性和免疫效果。材料和方法。本研究纳入100例符合纳入标准的18-60岁人群,平均年龄31.09±1.13岁。所有的研究参与者被平均分为两组。采用法国赛诺菲巴斯德公司(Sanofi Pasteur)的脑膜炎A+C®疫苗(以下简称MPV2 AC)作为对照。PHA研究采用俄罗斯Bio-Diagnostics有限责任公司(注册证号:68925985-10)生产的《红细胞脑膜炎球菌多糖群A、B、C液诊断试剂》检测系统进行。2011年10月17日发布的FSR 2011/11185)。结果和讨论。评估疫苗的反应原性和安全性的研究结果:在接种后的前7天,接种脑膜炎球菌A+C多糖疫苗的12.0% (95% CI: 5.62-23.80%)发生了反应,而接种MPV2 AS的对照组10.0% (95% CI: 4.35-21.36%)发生了反应。两组间差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。免疫原性评估研究结果:临床试验参与者单次免疫后第28天,接种脑膜炎球菌A+C多糖疫苗组和对照组(接种MPV2 AC疫苗)的抗体滴度均有统计学意义的升高,p≤0.001:76.0% (95% CI: 62.59 ~ 85.70%),对照组为74.0% (95% CI: 60.45 ~ 84.13%), χ2 =0.0533, p=0.818。结论。脑膜炎球菌A+C多糖疫苗具有与MPV2 AC疫苗相当的安全性、低反应原性和高免疫原性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Conjugated Vaccines and the Problem of Changing Circulating Serotypes of Pneumococcus Specificity of Teaching in the Section «General Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases» for Foreign Students Similarities and Differences in the Manifestations of the COVID-19 Epidemic Process in Some Countries Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment by Personnel of Medical Organizations of Various Profiles in the Provision of Medical Care to Patients with COVID-19 Assessment of the State of Antidiphtheria Immunity in Different Age Groups of the Population of the Russian Federation Based on Seromonitoring Data for 2015–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1