The Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces scale: a preliminary validation of the questionnaire

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT Equality Diversity and Inclusion Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1108/edi-01-2023-0022
Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia, Valentina Sommovigo, Laura Borgogni
{"title":"The Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces scale: a preliminary validation of the questionnaire","authors":"Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia, Valentina Sommovigo, Laura Borgogni","doi":"10.1108/edi-01-2023-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Drawing on Shore and colleagues' model of inclusive workplaces (2018) and the perceptions of social context framework (Borgogni et al ., 2010), this study aims to develop and provide a preliminary validation of the Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces (SDIW) scale. Design/methodology/approach Using inductive and deductive approaches, items were developed. The resulting pool of 28 items was administrated to 1,244 employees using an anonymous online survey. The factor structure of the SDIW scale was tested through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliabilities were estimated. Alternative models were tested through CFAs. Nomological validity and measurement invariance across gender were explored. Findings The EFA revealed a three-factor structure, including inclusive colleagues, supervisors and top management. This solution was confirmed by the CFA and outperformed all alternative models, showing good reliabilities. Measurement invariance across gender was confirmed. Correlations indicated that the SDIW total score and each dimension were positively associated with belongingness needs satisfaction and affective commitment, while negatively related to interpersonal strain, negative acts and turnover intention. Practical implications This study provides practitioners with a reliable tool to map social drivers of inclusion within workplaces in order to design tailored interventions. Originality/value This study contributes to the inclusion literature, as it is the first to provide a scale that simultaneously measures employees' perceptions of inclusive behaviours enacted by the three main social actors within the workplace.","PeriodicalId":46962,"journal":{"name":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","volume":" 38","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality Diversity and Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-01-2023-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Drawing on Shore and colleagues' model of inclusive workplaces (2018) and the perceptions of social context framework (Borgogni et al ., 2010), this study aims to develop and provide a preliminary validation of the Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces (SDIW) scale. Design/methodology/approach Using inductive and deductive approaches, items were developed. The resulting pool of 28 items was administrated to 1,244 employees using an anonymous online survey. The factor structure of the SDIW scale was tested through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliabilities were estimated. Alternative models were tested through CFAs. Nomological validity and measurement invariance across gender were explored. Findings The EFA revealed a three-factor structure, including inclusive colleagues, supervisors and top management. This solution was confirmed by the CFA and outperformed all alternative models, showing good reliabilities. Measurement invariance across gender was confirmed. Correlations indicated that the SDIW total score and each dimension were positively associated with belongingness needs satisfaction and affective commitment, while negatively related to interpersonal strain, negative acts and turnover intention. Practical implications This study provides practitioners with a reliable tool to map social drivers of inclusion within workplaces in order to design tailored interventions. Originality/value This study contributes to the inclusion literature, as it is the first to provide a scale that simultaneously measures employees' perceptions of inclusive behaviours enacted by the three main social actors within the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包容性工作场所的社会驱动力量表:对问卷的初步验证
利用Shore及其同事的包容性工作场所模型(2018)和社会背景框架的感知(Borgogni et al ., 2010),本研究旨在开发并初步验证包容性工作场所(SDIW)量表的社会驱动因素。设计/方法/方法使用归纳和演绎的方法,开发项目。通过匿名在线调查,共有28个问题被分配给了1244名员工。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对SDIW量表的因子结构进行检验。估计了可靠性。通过cfa对备选模型进行测试。探讨了不同性别的法效度和测量不变性。结果:员工素质评估呈现三因素结构,包括包容性的同事、主管和高层管理人员。该方案得到了CFA的验证,并优于所有替代模型,显示出良好的可靠性。性别间的测量不变性得到了证实。相关分析表明,SDIW总分和各维度与归属感、需求满意度和情感承诺呈显著正相关,与人际紧张、消极行为和离职倾向呈显著负相关。本研究为从业者提供了一个可靠的工具来绘制工作场所内包容的社会驱动因素,以便设计量身定制的干预措施。原创性/价值本研究为包容性文献做出了贡献,因为它首次提供了一个量表,同时衡量员工对工作场所中三个主要社会行动者所实施的包容性行为的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
The Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces scale: a preliminary validation of the questionnaire Hope theory as resistance: narratives of South Asian scholars in Australian academia Coping techniques and strategies for pursuing anti-racism within academe: a collective autoethnographic account from minoritised academics in the UK Covering Número 85: a content analysis and critical race theory perspective Addressing the challenge of engaging in paid work while undertaking unpaid caring: insights for improving employment inclusion of young carers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1