Impacts of Cesarean Section on Neonatal Gut Microbiome and Future Health Outcomes: A qualitative analysis of the literature

Paige Buffington, Alexia M Sebghati, Kasey B Stewart, Samantha Lawson, Oleg Karaduta
{"title":"Impacts of Cesarean Section on Neonatal Gut Microbiome and Future Health Outcomes: A qualitative analysis of the literature","authors":"Paige Buffington, Alexia M Sebghati, Kasey B Stewart, Samantha Lawson, Oleg Karaduta","doi":"10.1530/mah-23-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study aims to evaluate the impact of cesarean section delivery on the neonatal intestinal microflora compared to vaginal deliveries. Design A mini-review. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was implemented, primarily using PubMed, to identify relevant studies published in English within the past 10 years. Selected studies were appraised by three independent reviewers using JBI critical appraisal and data extraction forms. Four articles were included in the analysis, encompassing systematic reviews and a retrospective cohort study. Primary and secondary outcome data were combined across these studies. Results Selected studies revealed consistent trends in bacterial colonization differences between cesarean and vaginal deliveries. Vaginally delivered infants exhibited higher populations of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium , Lactobacillus , and Bacteroides . Cesarean-delivered infants, on the other hand, showed greater colonization of Enterococcus , Klebsiella , Clostridium , Staphylococcus , Streptococcus , and Corynebacterium . Statistically significant differences were observed in two studies. All articles explored the potential health implications of these microbiome differences, with associations found between cesarean deliveries and various health outcomes. Conclusion This review demonstrates that cesarean section delivery influences the composition of the neonatal gut microbiota. The presence of certain bacterial species more prevalent in vaginally delivered infants, such as Bifidobacterium , is associated with improved infant health, while species found in cesarean-delivered infants, such as Clostridium , increase the risk of certain infections. Recognizing the increased health risks for cesarean-born infants enables clinicians to implement early screening, treatment, or prevention strategies, potentially reducing future morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":250141,"journal":{"name":"Microbiota and Host","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiota and Host","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/mah-23-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate the impact of cesarean section delivery on the neonatal intestinal microflora compared to vaginal deliveries. Design A mini-review. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was implemented, primarily using PubMed, to identify relevant studies published in English within the past 10 years. Selected studies were appraised by three independent reviewers using JBI critical appraisal and data extraction forms. Four articles were included in the analysis, encompassing systematic reviews and a retrospective cohort study. Primary and secondary outcome data were combined across these studies. Results Selected studies revealed consistent trends in bacterial colonization differences between cesarean and vaginal deliveries. Vaginally delivered infants exhibited higher populations of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium , Lactobacillus , and Bacteroides . Cesarean-delivered infants, on the other hand, showed greater colonization of Enterococcus , Klebsiella , Clostridium , Staphylococcus , Streptococcus , and Corynebacterium . Statistically significant differences were observed in two studies. All articles explored the potential health implications of these microbiome differences, with associations found between cesarean deliveries and various health outcomes. Conclusion This review demonstrates that cesarean section delivery influences the composition of the neonatal gut microbiota. The presence of certain bacterial species more prevalent in vaginally delivered infants, such as Bifidobacterium , is associated with improved infant health, while species found in cesarean-delivered infants, such as Clostridium , increase the risk of certain infections. Recognizing the increased health risks for cesarean-born infants enables clinicians to implement early screening, treatment, or prevention strategies, potentially reducing future morbidity and mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产对新生儿肠道微生物组和未来健康结果的影响:文献的定性分析
目的探讨剖宫产与阴道分娩对新生儿肠道菌群的影响。设计一个小型回顾。方法采用综合检索策略,以PubMed为主要检索工具,检索近10年发表的相关英文文献。选定的研究由三名独立审稿人使用JBI关键评估和数据提取表格进行评估。四篇文章被纳入分析,包括系统综述和回顾性队列研究。将这些研究的主要和次要结局数据结合起来。结果选定的研究揭示了剖宫产和阴道分娩之间细菌定植差异的一致趋势。阴道分娩的婴儿显示出更高的有益菌群,如双歧杆菌、乳杆菌和拟杆菌。另一方面,剖宫产婴儿肠球菌、克雷伯氏菌、梭状芽胞杆菌、葡萄球菌、链球菌和棒状杆菌的定植量更大。在两项研究中观察到统计学上的显著差异。所有文章都探讨了这些微生物组差异对健康的潜在影响,并发现剖宫产与各种健康结果之间存在关联。结论剖宫产会影响新生儿肠道菌群的组成。在阴道分娩的婴儿中更为普遍的某些细菌种类的存在,如双歧杆菌,与婴儿健康状况的改善有关,而在剖腹产分娩的婴儿中发现的物种,如梭状芽孢杆菌,则增加了某些感染的风险。认识到剖宫产婴儿增加的健康风险使临床医生能够实施早期筛查、治疗或预防策略,从而潜在地降低未来的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of gut microbiota on vascularization of the small intestine COMMENSAL FUNGI AND OXALATE DEGRADATION: IS THERE A LINK? Effect of heavy metals on gut barrier integrity and gut microbiota Probiotics in bone fracture treatment? A narrative literature review Contributions of the microbiota to the systemic inflammatory response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1