The Influence of Brittleness of Interlayers on the Failure Behavior of Bedding Rock; Experimental Test and Particle Flow Code Simulation

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.3311/ppci.23023
Rahim Mortezaei, Seyed Davoud Mohammadi, Vahab Sarfarazi, Reza Bahrami
{"title":"The Influence of Brittleness of Interlayers on the Failure Behavior of Bedding Rock; Experimental Test and Particle Flow Code Simulation","authors":"Rahim Mortezaei, Seyed Davoud Mohammadi, Vahab Sarfarazi, Reza Bahrami","doi":"10.3311/ppci.23023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, the effects of angle and brittleness of interlayers on the shear failure behavior of notched bedding rock have been scrutinized using experimental shear tests and particle flow code (PFC) simulation. Notched bedding models with dimensions of 20 cm × 24 cm × 5 cm containing soft interlayer and hard interlayer were prepared. The ratio of compressive strength to tensile strength in soft gypsum and hard gypsum are 12 and 7.8, respectively. The layer angel changed from 0° to 90° with an increment of 15°. The lengths of notches in each model are similar and were equal to 20 mm, 40 mm, and 60 mm. Models were tested by Punch shear by displacement loading rates of 0.05 mm/min. Results showed that pure tensile fracture was developed from the tip of the notch, and propagated in the direction of the shear loading axis till coalescence with the model boundary. Whereas soft brittle gypsum has less deformability in comparison to hard ductile gypsum therefore the continuity of shear displacement associated with crack growth in soft interlayer was less than that in hard interlayer. Also, soft brittle gypsum has less shear strength in comparison to hard ductile gypsum therefore the shear strength of bedding rock has maximum value when hard ductile gypsum was occupied more percentage of shear surfaces. The failure mechanism was alike in both the numerical simulation and the experimental test.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppci.23023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, the effects of angle and brittleness of interlayers on the shear failure behavior of notched bedding rock have been scrutinized using experimental shear tests and particle flow code (PFC) simulation. Notched bedding models with dimensions of 20 cm × 24 cm × 5 cm containing soft interlayer and hard interlayer were prepared. The ratio of compressive strength to tensile strength in soft gypsum and hard gypsum are 12 and 7.8, respectively. The layer angel changed from 0° to 90° with an increment of 15°. The lengths of notches in each model are similar and were equal to 20 mm, 40 mm, and 60 mm. Models were tested by Punch shear by displacement loading rates of 0.05 mm/min. Results showed that pure tensile fracture was developed from the tip of the notch, and propagated in the direction of the shear loading axis till coalescence with the model boundary. Whereas soft brittle gypsum has less deformability in comparison to hard ductile gypsum therefore the continuity of shear displacement associated with crack growth in soft interlayer was less than that in hard interlayer. Also, soft brittle gypsum has less shear strength in comparison to hard ductile gypsum therefore the shear strength of bedding rock has maximum value when hard ductile gypsum was occupied more percentage of shear surfaces. The failure mechanism was alike in both the numerical simulation and the experimental test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夹层脆性对顺层岩石破坏行为的影响实验测试和粒子流模拟代码
本文采用实验剪切试验和颗粒流程序(PFC)模拟研究了夹层角度和脆性对缺口层理岩石剪切破坏行为的影响。制备了尺寸为20 cm × 24 cm × 5 cm、含软夹层和硬夹层的缺口层理模型。软石膏和硬石膏的抗压强度与抗拉强度之比分别为12和7.8。层角从0°变为90°,增量为15°。每个型号的缺口长度相似,分别为20mm、40mm和60mm。以0.05 mm/min的位移加载速率对模型进行冲剪试验。结果表明:纯拉伸断裂从缺口尖端开始,沿剪切加载轴方向扩展,直至与模型边界合并;而软脆石膏的变形能力比硬韧性石膏小,因此软质夹层中与裂纹扩展相关的剪切位移的连续性小于硬质夹层。软脆石膏的抗剪强度小于硬延性石膏,因此当硬延性石膏在剪切面中所占比例较大时,顺层岩的抗剪强度最大。数值模拟结果与试验结果的破坏机理一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1