Evaluating global data policies around non-personal data on social and public good

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Policy Regulation and Governance Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1108/dprg-03-2023-0044
Asmita Verma, Anjula Gurtoo
{"title":"Evaluating global data policies around non-personal data on social and public good","authors":"Asmita Verma, Anjula Gurtoo","doi":"10.1108/dprg-03-2023-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The paper aims to review rules and policy guidelines worldwide around non-personal data (NPD) and evaluate the policies on criteria that allow for the use of data for economic and social good. A review related to diverse policy approaches of various countries remains a research gap, and hence the analysis in the paper is designed with the intention of developing a research framework and providing policy gaps for further exploration. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of academic and non-academic literature on theoretical foundations, applications of NPD for economic and social good and NPD policies and regulations was conducted to identify the evaluation criteria. A total of 32 dimensions got identified for evaluation. As second step, content analysis was used for evaluation. A total of 13 documents from 6 countries and 1 geographical region were identified for evaluation. The documents were evaluated based on the 32 dimensions spread across 5 domains that facilitate data access and sharing for economic and societal benefit. Findings The analysis highlights three distinct emerging perspectives on data exchange: most policy and regulatory documents acknowledge the importance of identifying different types of NPD and accordingly describing the distinct roles and responsibilities of data actors for leveraging the data; the policy and regulatory frameworks clearly focus on increasing business opportunities, data sharing cooperation and innovation; and findings also demonstrate certain gaps in the policy frameworks such as a more comprehensive discussion on data access and sharing mechanisms, particularly data sandboxes and open data, and concrete norms and rigorous standards regarding accountability, transparency, ownership and confidentiality. Furthermore, policies and regulations may include appropriate incentive structures for data providers and users to ensure unhindered and sustainable access to data for the common good. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper represents one of the first research contributions evaluating global data policies focused on NPD in the context of its increasing use as a public good. The paper first identifies evaluation criteria for the analysis on public and social good, and, thus, provides a conceptual framework for future research. Additionally, the analysis identifies the broad domains of policy analysis on social and public good for data economics.","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-03-2023-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to review rules and policy guidelines worldwide around non-personal data (NPD) and evaluate the policies on criteria that allow for the use of data for economic and social good. A review related to diverse policy approaches of various countries remains a research gap, and hence the analysis in the paper is designed with the intention of developing a research framework and providing policy gaps for further exploration. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review of academic and non-academic literature on theoretical foundations, applications of NPD for economic and social good and NPD policies and regulations was conducted to identify the evaluation criteria. A total of 32 dimensions got identified for evaluation. As second step, content analysis was used for evaluation. A total of 13 documents from 6 countries and 1 geographical region were identified for evaluation. The documents were evaluated based on the 32 dimensions spread across 5 domains that facilitate data access and sharing for economic and societal benefit. Findings The analysis highlights three distinct emerging perspectives on data exchange: most policy and regulatory documents acknowledge the importance of identifying different types of NPD and accordingly describing the distinct roles and responsibilities of data actors for leveraging the data; the policy and regulatory frameworks clearly focus on increasing business opportunities, data sharing cooperation and innovation; and findings also demonstrate certain gaps in the policy frameworks such as a more comprehensive discussion on data access and sharing mechanisms, particularly data sandboxes and open data, and concrete norms and rigorous standards regarding accountability, transparency, ownership and confidentiality. Furthermore, policies and regulations may include appropriate incentive structures for data providers and users to ensure unhindered and sustainable access to data for the common good. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper represents one of the first research contributions evaluating global data policies focused on NPD in the context of its increasing use as a public good. The paper first identifies evaluation criteria for the analysis on public and social good, and, thus, provides a conceptual framework for future research. Additionally, the analysis identifies the broad domains of policy analysis on social and public good for data economics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估有关社会和公共利益的非个人数据的全球数据政策
本文旨在审查全球有关非个人数据(NPD)的规则和政策指导方针,并评估有关允许将数据用于经济和社会利益的标准的政策。对各国不同政策方法的回顾仍然是一个研究缺口,因此本文的分析旨在制定一个研究框架,并为进一步探索提供政策缺口。通过对理论基础、新产品开发在经济和社会公益中的应用以及新产品开发政策和法规等方面的学术和非学术文献进行系统回顾,确定评估标准。共确定了32个维度进行评价。第二步,采用内容分析法进行评价。共有来自6个国家和1个地理区域的13份文件被确定用于评价。这些文件是根据5个领域的32个维度进行评估的,这些领域促进了数据的访问和共享,以实现经济和社会效益。分析强调了关于数据交换的三个不同的新兴观点:大多数政策和监管文件承认识别不同类型的NPD的重要性,并相应地描述数据参与者在利用数据方面的不同角色和责任;政策和监管框架明确侧重于增加商业机会、数据共享、合作和创新;调查结果还表明,政策框架中存在某些差距,例如对数据获取和共享机制(特别是数据沙箱和开放数据)的更全面讨论,以及在问责制、透明度、所有权和保密性方面的具体规范和严格标准。此外,政策和条例可包括适当的激励结构,鼓励数据提供者和用户确保为了共同利益不受阻碍和可持续地获取数据。据作者所知,本文是第一批评估全球数据政策的研究成果之一,这些政策关注NPD作为一种公共产品越来越多地使用。本文首先确定了公共利益和社会利益分析的评价标准,从而为未来的研究提供了一个概念框架。此外,该分析还确定了数据经济学在社会和公共利益方面的政策分析的广泛领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
期刊最新文献
Socio and macroeconomic determinants of mobile money adoption: a cross-cultural study of selected MENA and Sub-Saharan countries Adoption of digital payment FinTech service by Gen Y and Gen Z users: evidence from India Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable? Enterprise architecture for the transformation of public services based on citizen’s feedback Blockchain for environmental peacebuilding: application in water management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1