Corporate governance from colonial Ceylon to post-civil war Sri Lanka

IF 3.3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management & Governance Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s10997-023-09678-5
Kamil K. Nazliben, Luc Renneboog, Emil Uduwalage
{"title":"Corporate governance from colonial Ceylon to post-civil war Sri Lanka","authors":"Kamil K. Nazliben, Luc Renneboog, Emil Uduwalage","doi":"10.1007/s10997-023-09678-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the corporate governance mechanisms in Sri Lanka, a country that only a little more than a decade ago emerged from a 30-year long civil war. We focus on the evolution of Sri Lanka’s corporate governance from historical, sociocultural, and institutional perspectives. Taking Sri Lanka as a case where inclusiveness and reconciliation at the board level is important, we aim to diagnose the key corporate governance issues which we then broaden towards other South Asia developing countries and provide a research agenda. Many Sri Lankan firms suffer from typical Asian-style agency problems; conflicts of interest between (i) minority and majority shareholders, (ii) shareholders and debtholders, and (iii) shareholders and stakeholders. The most prevalent agency problem is the expropriation of minority shareholders’ rights through ownership pyramids, cross-holdings, or intermediate private firms. Although creditor protection laws limit the expropriation of debtholders’ rights, firms’ widespread use of political connections forces banks to grant cheap credit at favorable terms. Poor stakeholder management creates agency problems following window dressing of ESG disclosures, corporate opacity, and ethnicity-and gender-based discrimination in the workplace. This study shows that social norms and ethical values play a non-negligible role in the functioning of the corporate governance regulation and in corporate culture in Sri Lanka.","PeriodicalId":16146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Governance","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09678-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the corporate governance mechanisms in Sri Lanka, a country that only a little more than a decade ago emerged from a 30-year long civil war. We focus on the evolution of Sri Lanka’s corporate governance from historical, sociocultural, and institutional perspectives. Taking Sri Lanka as a case where inclusiveness and reconciliation at the board level is important, we aim to diagnose the key corporate governance issues which we then broaden towards other South Asia developing countries and provide a research agenda. Many Sri Lankan firms suffer from typical Asian-style agency problems; conflicts of interest between (i) minority and majority shareholders, (ii) shareholders and debtholders, and (iii) shareholders and stakeholders. The most prevalent agency problem is the expropriation of minority shareholders’ rights through ownership pyramids, cross-holdings, or intermediate private firms. Although creditor protection laws limit the expropriation of debtholders’ rights, firms’ widespread use of political connections forces banks to grant cheap credit at favorable terms. Poor stakeholder management creates agency problems following window dressing of ESG disclosures, corporate opacity, and ethnicity-and gender-based discrimination in the workplace. This study shows that social norms and ethical values play a non-negligible role in the functioning of the corporate governance regulation and in corporate culture in Sri Lanka.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从殖民时期的锡兰到内战后的斯里兰卡的公司治理
本文考察了斯里兰卡的公司治理机制,这个国家十多年前才从长达30年的内战中解脱出来。我们从历史、社会文化和制度的角度关注斯里兰卡公司治理的演变。以斯里兰卡为例,董事会层面的包容性和和解很重要,我们的目标是诊断关键的公司治理问题,然后将其扩展到其他南亚发展中国家,并提供研究议程。许多斯里兰卡公司都有典型的亚洲式代理问题;(i)少数股东和大股东之间的利益冲突,(ii)股东和债权人之间的利益冲突,以及(iii)股东和利益相关者之间的利益冲突。最普遍的代理问题是通过所有权金字塔、交叉持股或中间私营公司对小股东权利的剥夺。尽管债权人保护法限制了对债权人权利的剥夺,但企业广泛利用政治关系迫使银行以优惠条件发放廉价信贷。在ESG信息披露、公司不透明以及工作场所的种族和性别歧视之后,糟糕的利益相关者管理造成了代理问题。本研究表明,社会规范和伦理价值观在斯里兰卡公司治理监管和企业文化的运作中发挥着不可忽视的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management and Governance (JMG) is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of corporate governance issues within and throughout privately-held firms, publicly-held corporations and government-controlled organizations. The journal is devoted to exploring the links between management and governance through both theoretical analyses and empirical investigations to improve the understanding of all the rules, codes, principles, practices, processes, mechanisms, structure and relationships, as well as institutions, networks and individuals affecting the way firms and organizations are managed, administered and controlled. Since corporate governance is a multi-faceted subject, the journal aims to analyze a broad spectrum of topics and issues related to the management and governance of firms and organizations: strategies and decision-making; accounting, reporting and information control; measurement issues in governance; relational, cognitive and behavioural based; institutional economics. JMG intends to act as an arena of scientific debate within and among academic and professional networks of researchers with a strong interest in investigating how knowledge, preferences and performance are formed and how they influence governance and management practices and policies. Contributions from all areas of business administration (accounting and control, general and strategic management, organizational theory and behaviour, finance and banking) and manuscripts concerning both the private and the public sectors are welcome to the extent that they contribute to these general issues and to the understanding of governance thus broadly defined. JMG is international in authorship and editorship. It follows the internationally shared norms of blind review and research quality standards, but it distinctively and deliberately adheres to a constructive rather than destructive review process approach. The j ournal has various paper formats and methods. Any research strategy is recognised, as long as it effectively addresses the issue at hand and rigorously adheres to the methodology adopted, in survey research or simulation, a case study or a statistical analysis. Officially cited as: J Manag Gov
期刊最新文献
Intellectual capital, innovation and the bushy form of knowledge capitalisation Multiple control strategies and franchisor performance: Performance effects of authoritative, contractual, and relational control mechanisms Do boards effectively link firm objectives to CEO bonus performance measures? Looking for missing outcomes: accounting for intellectual capital and value creation in ecosystems Does board composition matter for innovation? A longitudinal study of the organizational slack–innovation relationship in Nasdaq-100 companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1