Economic-financial performance and value creation in the Brazilian construction industry

IF 1.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1108/arla-06-2023-0095
Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, Davidson Junio Costa
{"title":"Economic-financial performance and value creation in the Brazilian construction industry","authors":"Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, Davidson Junio Costa","doi":"10.1108/arla-06-2023-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to analyze the economic-financial performance (EFP) and value creation (VC) in the Brazilian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach Based on the theories of strategy and finance, a quantitative-qualitative, descriptive and explanatory and applied study was carried out, contrasting the performance of the Direcional company and the civil construction industry – both listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange and the Over-the-Counter Market (B3) Findings The analysis of the EFP in the Brazilian construction industry shows that EZTEC, Helbor, Trisul and Direcional were the companies with the best EFP in the period. The analysis of the Economic Value Added (EVA®, henceforth EVA), as a VC metric and basis for assessing the relative technical efficiency score by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA®, henceforth DEA), revealed that the companies Direcional, EZTEC, MRV and CR2 were considered efficient throughout the period covered. The multicriteria methodology for empirical testing of the EFP and VC allowed not only contrasts Direcional's results with the other companies of the construction industry but also offered a complementary tool for comparative analysis of enterprises of different sizes, structures and realities. Research limitations/implications Regardless of any contextual limitations, from a theoretical point of view, the research not only helps fill the research gap aforementioned but also expands knowledge on the topic and demonstrates how this multi-criteria methodology (integrating DEA and EVA) can be used to assess EFP and VC in addition to traditional tools. However, this new approach evaluates, at the same time, corporate and sectorial effectiveness by contrasting the efficiency and efficacy (simultaneously) in the generation of performance and value of a company in relation to the industry. Practical implications Significant implications for managerial practice could be noted by offering a tool to improve company performance and creating a competitive benchmarking process for analysts, investors, managers, financing agencies, shareholders, policymakers and business owners, as well as organizations and sectors in similar situations – who need to assess the EFP and VC holistically and improve their decision-making processes. Originality/value The uniqueness and innovation of this research come from the original multi-criteria methodology developed, applied and validated for analysis of EFP and VC. This methodology was operationalized through DEA applied to the companies' EVA, making it possible to compare corporate results and those of the whole industry in a balanced way – an unexplored issue in the literature, especially in emerging economies, opening several avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":45515,"journal":{"name":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","volume":"88 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-06-2023-0095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyze the economic-financial performance (EFP) and value creation (VC) in the Brazilian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach Based on the theories of strategy and finance, a quantitative-qualitative, descriptive and explanatory and applied study was carried out, contrasting the performance of the Direcional company and the civil construction industry – both listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange and the Over-the-Counter Market (B3) Findings The analysis of the EFP in the Brazilian construction industry shows that EZTEC, Helbor, Trisul and Direcional were the companies with the best EFP in the period. The analysis of the Economic Value Added (EVA®, henceforth EVA), as a VC metric and basis for assessing the relative technical efficiency score by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA®, henceforth DEA), revealed that the companies Direcional, EZTEC, MRV and CR2 were considered efficient throughout the period covered. The multicriteria methodology for empirical testing of the EFP and VC allowed not only contrasts Direcional's results with the other companies of the construction industry but also offered a complementary tool for comparative analysis of enterprises of different sizes, structures and realities. Research limitations/implications Regardless of any contextual limitations, from a theoretical point of view, the research not only helps fill the research gap aforementioned but also expands knowledge on the topic and demonstrates how this multi-criteria methodology (integrating DEA and EVA) can be used to assess EFP and VC in addition to traditional tools. However, this new approach evaluates, at the same time, corporate and sectorial effectiveness by contrasting the efficiency and efficacy (simultaneously) in the generation of performance and value of a company in relation to the industry. Practical implications Significant implications for managerial practice could be noted by offering a tool to improve company performance and creating a competitive benchmarking process for analysts, investors, managers, financing agencies, shareholders, policymakers and business owners, as well as organizations and sectors in similar situations – who need to assess the EFP and VC holistically and improve their decision-making processes. Originality/value The uniqueness and innovation of this research come from the original multi-criteria methodology developed, applied and validated for analysis of EFP and VC. This methodology was operationalized through DEA applied to the companies' EVA, making it possible to compare corporate results and those of the whole industry in a balanced way – an unexplored issue in the literature, especially in emerging economies, opening several avenues for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西建筑业的经济财务表现和价值创造
本文旨在分析巴西建筑业的经济财务绩效(EFP)和价值创造(VC)。基于战略和金融理论,进行了定量定性,描述性和解释性和应用研究,对比了该公司和民用建筑行业的表现-都在巴西证券交易所和场外交易市场(B3)上市。Trisul和dional是该时期EFP最好的公司。通过数据包络分析(DEA)对经济增加值(EVA®,以下简称EVA)作为风险投资指标和评估相对技术效率得分的基础进行分析,发现在整个覆盖期间,公司dional, EZTEC, MRV和CR2被认为是高效的。对EFP和VC进行实证测试的多标准方法不仅可以将dional的结果与建筑行业的其他公司进行对比,而且还为不同规模、结构和现实的企业提供了比较分析的补充工具。无论任何背景限制,从理论角度来看,该研究不仅有助于填补上述研究空白,而且还扩展了该主题的知识,并展示了除了传统工具之外,如何使用这种多标准方法(整合DEA和EVA)来评估EFP和VC。然而,这种新方法同时通过对比公司在与行业相关的业绩和价值产生方面的效率和功效来评估公司和行业的有效性。通过提供一种工具来提高公司绩效,并为分析师、投资者、经理、融资机构、股东、政策制定者和企业主以及处于类似情况的组织和部门创建一个有竞争力的基准流程,可以注意到对管理实践的重大影响——他们需要全面评估EFP和VC,并改进他们的决策流程。原创性/价值本研究的独特性和创新性来自于原始的多标准方法,该方法开发、应用并验证了EFP和VC的分析。该方法通过将DEA应用于公司的EVA来实施,从而可以以平衡的方式比较公司结果和整个行业的结果-这是文献中未探索的问题,特别是在新兴经济体中,为未来的研究开辟了几种途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The role of dynamic capabilities on the effectiveness of organizational changes in public sector Sustainable strategies and firm performance in manufacturing industry of Coahuila, Mexico Economic-financial performance and value creation in the Brazilian construction industry Firm certification and export performance: the case of the “SME Leader” label Innovation in the tourism sector, organizational learning and performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1