ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING OBJECIVE CRITERIA IN WRITING AND SPEAKING FEEDBACK STRATEGIES IN EFL

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.22190/jtesap230126016n
Biljana Naumoska-Sarakinska
{"title":"ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING OBJECIVE CRITERIA IN WRITING AND SPEAKING FEEDBACK STRATEGIES IN EFL","authors":"Biljana Naumoska-Sarakinska","doi":"10.22190/jtesap230126016n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing and speaking are termed productive or active skills due to the fact that learners need to produce language when doing these. As EFL teaching is increasingly becoming more and more oriented toward helping learners develop and improve their communicative competence, it is not surprising that speaking and writing skills are becoming ever-more important. Though it goes without saying that speaking and writing undoubtedly go hand in hand with the receptive skills, reading and listening, EFL learners, and instructors, are, nevertheless, focusing their attention on improving speaking and writing skills. This is why it is so significant that clear and objective criteria is established and provided in the EFL teaching and learning environment, as this criteria will benefit not only the learners, but the teachers as well. As assessment is an integral part of the teaching and learning process, it goes without saying that learners are bound to find themselves receiving some kind of feedback at some point in their acquisition of these skills. However, the issue that arises is the fact that this assessment tends to be seen by many learners as subjective rather than objective, which is not the case with assessing listening and reading comprehension, for example, where it is easier to pinpoint the mistakes. This paper takes a closer look at what this includes, and how it can be done, without disrupting either the teachers’ or the learners’ autonomy, and hence make the whole process that much smoother.","PeriodicalId":42098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap230126016n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing and speaking are termed productive or active skills due to the fact that learners need to produce language when doing these. As EFL teaching is increasingly becoming more and more oriented toward helping learners develop and improve their communicative competence, it is not surprising that speaking and writing skills are becoming ever-more important. Though it goes without saying that speaking and writing undoubtedly go hand in hand with the receptive skills, reading and listening, EFL learners, and instructors, are, nevertheless, focusing their attention on improving speaking and writing skills. This is why it is so significant that clear and objective criteria is established and provided in the EFL teaching and learning environment, as this criteria will benefit not only the learners, but the teachers as well. As assessment is an integral part of the teaching and learning process, it goes without saying that learners are bound to find themselves receiving some kind of feedback at some point in their acquisition of these skills. However, the issue that arises is the fact that this assessment tends to be seen by many learners as subjective rather than objective, which is not the case with assessing listening and reading comprehension, for example, where it is easier to pinpoint the mistakes. This paper takes a closer look at what this includes, and how it can be done, without disrupting either the teachers’ or the learners’ autonomy, and hence make the whole process that much smoother.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立和维护英语写作和口语反馈策略的客观标准
写作和口语被称为生产或主动技能,因为学习者在做这些事情时需要产生语言。随着英语教学越来越倾向于帮助学习者发展和提高他们的交际能力,口语和写作技能变得越来越重要也就不足为奇了。不用说,口语和写作无疑与接受能力、阅读和听力密切相关,然而,英语学习者和教师却把注意力集中在提高口语和写作技能上。这就是为什么在英语教学环境中建立和提供清晰客观的标准是如此重要,因为这些标准不仅有利于学习者,也有利于教师。由于评估是教学和学习过程中不可分割的一部分,毫无疑问,学习者在获得这些技能的过程中,一定会发现自己得到某种反馈。然而,出现的问题是,这种评估往往被许多学习者视为主观的,而不是客观的,这与评估听力和阅读理解的情况不同,例如,在评估听力和阅读理解时,更容易找出错误。本文深入探讨了这包括什么,以及如何在不干扰教师或学习者自主权的情况下做到这一点,从而使整个过程更加顺畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
57.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
KAIZENA: A TOOL FOR INDIVIDUALIZED AUDIO FEEDBACK ON ACADEMIC WRITING TEACHING CULTURE IN THE MODERN ESP CLASSROOM TEACHING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THROUGH CASE STUDIES: DESIGN, TEACHING, AND EVALUATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE USE OF GOOGLE CLASSROOM IN LSP LEARNING AND ITS EFFECTS ON DEVELOPING LINGUISTIC COMPETENCES ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ON M-READER: THE CASE OF FOUNDATION PROGRAM STUDENTS AT SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1