Investigating Heterogeneity in Response Strategies: A Mixture Multidimensional IRTree Approach

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Educational and Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1177/00131644231206765
Ö. Emre C. Alagöz, Thorsten Meiser
{"title":"Investigating Heterogeneity in Response Strategies: A Mixture Multidimensional IRTree Approach","authors":"Ö. Emre C. Alagöz, Thorsten Meiser","doi":"10.1177/00131644231206765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve the validity of self-report measures, researchers should control for response style (RS) effects, which can be achieved with IRTree models. A traditional IRTree model considers a response as a combination of distinct decision-making processes, where the substantive trait affects the decision on response direction, while decisions about choosing the middle category or extreme categories are largely determined by midpoint RS (MRS) and extreme RS (ERS). One limitation of traditional IRTree models is the assumption that all respondents utilize the same set of RS in their response strategies, whereas it can be assumed that the nature and the strength of RS effects can differ between individuals. To address this limitation, we propose a mixture multidimensional IRTree (MM-IRTree) model that detects heterogeneity in response strategies. The MM-IRTree model comprises four latent classes of respondents, each associated with a different set of RS traits in addition to the substantive trait. More specifically, the class-specific response strategies involve (1) only ERS in the “ERS only” class, (2) only MRS in the “MRS only” class, (3) both ERS and MRS in the “2RS” class, and (4) neither ERS nor MRS in the “0RS” class. In a simulation study, we showed that the MM-IRTree model performed well in recovering model parameters and class memberships, whereas the traditional IRTree approach showed poor performance if the population includes a mixture of response strategies. In an application to empirical data, the MM-IRTree model revealed distinct classes with noticeable class sizes, suggesting that respondents indeed utilize different response strategies.","PeriodicalId":11502,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","volume":" 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644231206765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve the validity of self-report measures, researchers should control for response style (RS) effects, which can be achieved with IRTree models. A traditional IRTree model considers a response as a combination of distinct decision-making processes, where the substantive trait affects the decision on response direction, while decisions about choosing the middle category or extreme categories are largely determined by midpoint RS (MRS) and extreme RS (ERS). One limitation of traditional IRTree models is the assumption that all respondents utilize the same set of RS in their response strategies, whereas it can be assumed that the nature and the strength of RS effects can differ between individuals. To address this limitation, we propose a mixture multidimensional IRTree (MM-IRTree) model that detects heterogeneity in response strategies. The MM-IRTree model comprises four latent classes of respondents, each associated with a different set of RS traits in addition to the substantive trait. More specifically, the class-specific response strategies involve (1) only ERS in the “ERS only” class, (2) only MRS in the “MRS only” class, (3) both ERS and MRS in the “2RS” class, and (4) neither ERS nor MRS in the “0RS” class. In a simulation study, we showed that the MM-IRTree model performed well in recovering model parameters and class memberships, whereas the traditional IRTree approach showed poor performance if the population includes a mixture of response strategies. In an application to empirical data, the MM-IRTree model revealed distinct classes with noticeable class sizes, suggesting that respondents indeed utilize different response strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究响应策略的异质性:一种混合多维IRTree方法
为了提高自我报告量表的效度,研究人员应该控制反应风格(RS)效应,这可以通过IRTree模型来实现。传统的IRTree模型将响应视为不同决策过程的组合,其中实质性特征影响响应方向的决策,而选择中间类别或极端类别的决策主要由中点RS (MRS)和极端RS (ERS)决定。传统IRTree模型的一个局限性是假设所有受访者在其响应策略中使用相同的RS集,而可以假设RS效应的性质和强度在个体之间是不同的。为了解决这一限制,我们提出了一个混合多维IRTree (MM-IRTree)模型来检测响应策略的异质性。MM-IRTree模型包括四类潜在的被调查者,每一类都与一组不同的RS特征相关联。更具体地说,针对特定类别的响应策略包括(1)“仅限ERS”类别中的ERS,(2)“仅限MRS”类别中的MRS,(3)“2RS”类别中的ERS和MRS,以及(4)“0RS”类别中的ERS和MRS都不是。在模拟研究中,我们发现MM-IRTree模型在恢复模型参数和类隶属度方面表现良好,而传统的IRTree方法在总体包含混合响应策略时表现不佳。在对实证数据的应用中,MM-IRTree模型揭示了不同的类别和显著的班级规模,表明受访者确实使用不同的响应策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Educational and Psychological Measurement 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM) publishes referred scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in the study of measurement theory, problems, and issues. Theoretical articles address new developments and techniques, and applied articles deal with innovation applications.
期刊最新文献
Discriminant Validity of Interval Response Formats: Investigating the Dimensional Structure of Interval Widths. Novick Meets Bayes: Improving the Assessment of Individual Students in Educational Practice and Research by Capitalizing on Assessors' Prior Beliefs. Differential Item Functioning Effect Size Use for Validity Information. Optimal Number of Replications for Obtaining Stable Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs. Invariance: What Does Measurement Invariance Allow Us to Claim?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1