Cognitive load detection using Ci-SSA for EEG signal decomposition and nature-inspired feature selection

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.55730/1300-0632.4017
JAMMISETTY YEDUKONDALU, LAKHAN DEV SHARMA
{"title":"Cognitive load detection using Ci-SSA for EEG signal decomposition and nature-inspired feature selection","authors":"JAMMISETTY YEDUKONDALU, LAKHAN DEV SHARMA","doi":"10.55730/1300-0632.4017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive load detection is eminent during the mental assignment of neural activity because it indicates how the brain reacts to stimuli. The level of cognitive load experienced during mental arithmetic tasks can be determined using an electroencephalogram (EEG). The EEG data were collected from publicly available datasets, namely, mental arithmetic task (MAT) and simultaneous task workload (STEW). The first phase comprises decomposing the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) using circulant singular spectrum analysis (Ci-SSA). In the second phase, entropy-based features were evaluated using IMFs. After that, the extracted features were fed to nature-inspired feature selection algorithms: genetic algorithm (GA), binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), binary bat algorithm (BBA), and binary dragonfly algorithm (BDA) for optimal selection of features by using machine learning (ML) techniques: K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM) to analyse the classification accuracy (Ac), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), precision (Pr), and F-score with 10-fold cross-validation in the third phase. The highest classification Ac, Se, Sp, Pr, and F-score of the MAT dataset were 97.30%, 0.98, 0.97, and 97.40% from multileads, and 96.20%, 0.96, 0.94, and 96.70% from a single lead (F4) of EEG, respectively. However, we achieved 97.98%, 0.98, 0.98, 0.97, and 98.1% values from multi-leads and 96.67%, 0.96, 0.97, 0.95, and 96.90% from a single-lead STEW dataset. When compared to previous state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method (Ci-SSA+BDA+KNN) has proven to be more successful.","PeriodicalId":49410,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0632.4017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cognitive load detection is eminent during the mental assignment of neural activity because it indicates how the brain reacts to stimuli. The level of cognitive load experienced during mental arithmetic tasks can be determined using an electroencephalogram (EEG). The EEG data were collected from publicly available datasets, namely, mental arithmetic task (MAT) and simultaneous task workload (STEW). The first phase comprises decomposing the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) using circulant singular spectrum analysis (Ci-SSA). In the second phase, entropy-based features were evaluated using IMFs. After that, the extracted features were fed to nature-inspired feature selection algorithms: genetic algorithm (GA), binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), binary bat algorithm (BBA), and binary dragonfly algorithm (BDA) for optimal selection of features by using machine learning (ML) techniques: K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM) to analyse the classification accuracy (Ac), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), precision (Pr), and F-score with 10-fold cross-validation in the third phase. The highest classification Ac, Se, Sp, Pr, and F-score of the MAT dataset were 97.30%, 0.98, 0.97, and 97.40% from multileads, and 96.20%, 0.96, 0.94, and 96.70% from a single lead (F4) of EEG, respectively. However, we achieved 97.98%, 0.98, 0.98, 0.97, and 98.1% values from multi-leads and 96.67%, 0.96, 0.97, 0.95, and 96.90% from a single-lead STEW dataset. When compared to previous state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method (Ci-SSA+BDA+KNN) has proven to be more successful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Ci-SSA的脑电信号分解和自然特征选择认知负荷检测
认知负荷检测在神经活动的心理分配中是非常重要的,因为它表明了大脑对刺激的反应。在心算任务中所经历的认知负荷水平可以通过脑电图来确定。脑电数据收集自公开数据集,即心算任务(MAT)和同步任务工作量(STEW)。第一阶段是利用循环奇异谱分析(Ci-SSA)将脑电图(EEG)信号分解为内禀模式函数(IMFs)。在第二阶段,使用IMFs评估基于熵的特征。然后,将提取的特征输入到基于自然的特征选择算法中:遗传算法(GA)、二进制粒子群优化(BPSO)、粒子群优化(PSO)、二进制蝙蝠算法(BBA)、二进制蜻蜓算法(BDA),利用机器学习(ML)技术进行特征的最优选择:第三阶段采用k -最近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)对分类精度(Ac)、灵敏度(Se)、特异性(Sp)、精密度(Pr)和f评分进行10倍交叉验证。MAT数据集的最高分类Ac、Se、Sp、Pr和f得分,多导联的分别为97.30%、0.98、0.97和97.40%,单导联(F4)的EEG分类Ac、Se、Sp、Pr和f得分分别为96.20%、0.96、0.94和96.70%。然而,我们从多导联中获得了97.98%、0.98、0.98、0.97和98.1%的值,从单导联的STEW数据集中获得了96.67%、0.96、0.97、0.95和96.90%的值。与之前的最先进的方法相比,所提出的方法(Ci-SSA+BDA+KNN)已被证明是更成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6.9 months
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences is published electronically 6 times a year by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) Accepts English-language manuscripts in the areas of power and energy, environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, electronics, industry applications, control systems, information and systems, applied electromagnetics, communications, signal and image processing, tomographic image reconstruction, face recognition, biometrics, speech processing, video processing and analysis, object recognition, classification, feature extraction, parallel and distributed computing, cognitive systems, interaction, robotics, digital libraries and content, personalized healthcare, ICT for mobility, sensors, and artificial intelligence. Contribution is open to researchers of all nationalities.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of YOLO models and a transformer-based YOLOv5 model for mass detection in mammograms Feature selection optimization with filtering and wrapper methods: two disease classification cases New modified carrier-based level-shifted PWM control for NPC rectifiers considered for implementation in EV fast chargers FuzzyCSampling: A Hybrid fuzzy c-means clustering sampling strategy for imbalanced datasets A practical low-dimensional feature vector generation method based on wavelet transform for psychophysiological signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1