Die Nederlandse Geloofsbelydenis en drie besondere ampte: Artikel 30 ’n verstarring?

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.4102/hts.v79i1.9214
Piet J. Strauss
{"title":"Die Nederlandse Geloofsbelydenis en drie besondere ampte: Artikel 30 ’n verstarring?","authors":"Piet J. Strauss","doi":"10.4102/hts.v79i1.9214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Confessio Belgica and the three offices: Article 30 inflexible? The Confessio Belgica or Dutch Confession of Faith from 1561, one of the Three Formulas of Unity in the Dutch Reformed tradition, confesses in article 30 that the government of the church, as an institution of the Christian faith, should be spiritual and conducted by chosen consistories. These consistories should consist of ministers, elders and deacons. The norm or constant of three offices was excepted by churches in this tradition, but more recently it’s necessity and efficiency became questioned in some of these circles. Historically the three offices served the Reformed churches well. The acceptance of the three offices is based on the Confessio Belgica as a confession, but also on the biblical principle that Christ is the head of the church and its highest Prophet, eternal King and only Priest. The church grows spiritually out of Christ and his Spirit as their head. In this process, the church also uses the offices of minister, elder and deacon as instruments. These offices correspond with the offices of Christ as their Prophet, King and Priest. A study of the Confessio Belgica article 30 leads to the belief that it does not exclude changes in the task of the three offices nor opposes the addition of extra offices or the help of additional functionaries. Contribution: This article contributes theologically to the debate in the Dutch [ Netherlands ] Reformed churches on the offices in church. It tries to clarify all the thinking regarding the impact of the reformed Three Formulas of Unity, and especially the Dutch Confession of Faith article 30 on the work or service of the church and norms or principles to achieve an acceptable functioning of the offices in church. The solution aims at stability and new initiatives on the offices in church.","PeriodicalId":46916,"journal":{"name":"HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.9214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Confessio Belgica and the three offices: Article 30 inflexible? The Confessio Belgica or Dutch Confession of Faith from 1561, one of the Three Formulas of Unity in the Dutch Reformed tradition, confesses in article 30 that the government of the church, as an institution of the Christian faith, should be spiritual and conducted by chosen consistories. These consistories should consist of ministers, elders and deacons. The norm or constant of three offices was excepted by churches in this tradition, but more recently it’s necessity and efficiency became questioned in some of these circles. Historically the three offices served the Reformed churches well. The acceptance of the three offices is based on the Confessio Belgica as a confession, but also on the biblical principle that Christ is the head of the church and its highest Prophet, eternal King and only Priest. The church grows spiritually out of Christ and his Spirit as their head. In this process, the church also uses the offices of minister, elder and deacon as instruments. These offices correspond with the offices of Christ as their Prophet, King and Priest. A study of the Confessio Belgica article 30 leads to the belief that it does not exclude changes in the task of the three offices nor opposes the addition of extra offices or the help of additional functionaries. Contribution: This article contributes theologically to the debate in the Dutch [ Netherlands ] Reformed churches on the offices in church. It tries to clarify all the thinking regarding the impact of the reformed Three Formulas of Unity, and especially the Dutch Confession of Faith article 30 on the work or service of the church and norms or principles to achieve an acceptable functioning of the offices in church. The solution aims at stability and new initiatives on the offices in church.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Die Nederlandse Geloofsbelydenis en drie besondere ampte: Article 30 'n verstarring?
《比利时忏悔录》和三个办事处:第30条不灵活?1561年的《比利时信仰告白》(Confessio Belgica)或荷兰信仰告白,是荷兰改革宗传统中“三个合一公式”之一,在第30条中承认,作为基督教信仰的一个机构,教会的治理应该是属灵的,并由选定的教会成员来管理。这些会议应该由牧师、长老和执事组成。在这个传统中,三个办公室的规范或恒定被教会所例外,但最近它的必要性和效率在一些圈子里受到质疑。从历史上看,这三个职分很好地服务于改革宗教会。接受这三个职位是基于比利时的忏悔,但也基于圣经的原则,即基督是教会的头和最高的先知,永恒的王和唯一的祭司。教会在属灵上成长,是出于基督和他的灵作他们的头。在这个过程中,教会也使用了牧师、长老和执事的职分作为工具。这些职分与基督作为他们的先知、君王和祭司的职分相一致。对《比利时忏悔书》第30条的研究表明,该条并不排除改变三个办事处的任务,也不反对增加额外的办事处或增加工作人员的帮助。贡献:本文对荷兰归正教会关于教会职分的辩论有神学上的贡献。它试图澄清关于改革后的“合一三公式”的影响的所有思考,特别是荷兰信仰告白第30条对教会的工作或服务以及规范或原则,以实现教会办公室的可接受的功能。解决方案旨在稳定和教堂办公室的新举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Expanding our horizons for new discourses about ʾIslām and Islamic living The reception of the alternative voice by Afrikaans readers (1994–2002) Radical inclusivity and the journey on the way to somewhere [irgendwohin unterwegs] The ecclesiastical crisis of human sexuality: ‘Critical solidarity’, ‘critical distance’ or ‘critical engagement’ Ecclesia reformata semper reformanda: W.A. (Wim) Dreyer and the reformation of the Netherdutch Reformed Church of Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1