The reception of the alternative voice by Afrikaans readers (1994–2002)

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.4102/hts.v79i1.9053
Christina Landman
{"title":"The reception of the alternative voice by Afrikaans readers (1994–2002)","authors":"Christina Landman","doi":"10.4102/hts.v79i1.9053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 27 December 1994, woman theologian Christina Landman published her first contribution to the religious column Godsdiens Aktueel [Religion in Action] in the Afrikaans daily newspaper Beeld. The reaction of the Afrikaans readers of Beeld to what has been regarded by readers as ‘an alternative voice’ will be presented in this article. Although Landman is still writing for this column and has published 222 articles until 15 March 2023, in this article only the first 57 articles will be considered, published over 8 years between 1994 and 2002. The content and reference of the articles and the reaction of the readers to that have changed with the developments that occurred in Landman’s life story, as well as with the changes in politics and society since the democratic elections of 1994. From 1994 to 1999, Landman invited a reactionary response from readers by addressing them as gender and political activists. However, from the beginning of the first decade of the 21st century, from 2000, Landman addressed the readership from a perspective of the healing of society. The responses of readers in the letters to Beeld, both to the accusing and to the healing Landman, will not be analysed in terms of the presumed political and religious agendas of the readers, but will be presented under themes emanating from their letters in an unmediated fashion. The ‘audience reception’, as a methodology is applied contributing to advance readers’ responses to a modern religious text.Contribution: Contributing to an academic body of research, data gathered from 57 sources over 8 years, represent voices varying in race, gender and religious affiliation, providing for a minority of readers to be liberated through her voice. Audience reception’, as a methodology, enhances the academic debate on the development of thought in a specific culture-religious dialogue.","PeriodicalId":46916,"journal":{"name":"HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.9053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 27 December 1994, woman theologian Christina Landman published her first contribution to the religious column Godsdiens Aktueel [Religion in Action] in the Afrikaans daily newspaper Beeld. The reaction of the Afrikaans readers of Beeld to what has been regarded by readers as ‘an alternative voice’ will be presented in this article. Although Landman is still writing for this column and has published 222 articles until 15 March 2023, in this article only the first 57 articles will be considered, published over 8 years between 1994 and 2002. The content and reference of the articles and the reaction of the readers to that have changed with the developments that occurred in Landman’s life story, as well as with the changes in politics and society since the democratic elections of 1994. From 1994 to 1999, Landman invited a reactionary response from readers by addressing them as gender and political activists. However, from the beginning of the first decade of the 21st century, from 2000, Landman addressed the readership from a perspective of the healing of society. The responses of readers in the letters to Beeld, both to the accusing and to the healing Landman, will not be analysed in terms of the presumed political and religious agendas of the readers, but will be presented under themes emanating from their letters in an unmediated fashion. The ‘audience reception’, as a methodology is applied contributing to advance readers’ responses to a modern religious text.Contribution: Contributing to an academic body of research, data gathered from 57 sources over 8 years, represent voices varying in race, gender and religious affiliation, providing for a minority of readers to be liberated through her voice. Audience reception’, as a methodology, enhances the academic debate on the development of thought in a specific culture-religious dialogue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非荷兰语读者对另类声音的接受(1994-2002)
1994年12月27日,女神学家克里斯蒂娜·兰德曼在南非荷兰语日报《Beeld》上发表了她对宗教专栏goddsdiens Aktueel的第一篇文章。《Beeld》的南非荷兰语读者对被读者视为“另一种声音”的反应将在本文中呈现。虽然Landman仍在为本专栏写作,并在2023年3月15日之前发表了222篇文章,但在本文中只考虑前57篇文章,这些文章发表于1994年至2002年的8年间。文章的内容和参考以及读者对此的反应随着兰德曼生活故事的发展以及1994年民主选举以来政治和社会的变化而变化。从1994年到1999年,兰德曼将读者称为性别和政治活动家,引起了读者的反动反应。然而,从21世纪第一个十年开始,从2000年开始,兰德曼从社会愈合的角度向读者发表讲话。读者在给Beeld的信中的回应,无论是对指控还是对治愈的兰德曼的回应,都不会根据读者假定的政治和宗教议程进行分析,而是将以一种未经调解的方式呈现在他们的信中所产生的主题下。“受众接受”作为一种方法论,被应用于促进读者对现代宗教文本的反应。贡献:为学术研究机构做出贡献,8年来从57个来源收集数据,代表了不同种族、性别和宗教信仰的声音,为少数读者提供了通过她的声音获得解放的机会。“受众接受”作为一种方法论,加强了对特定文化-宗教对话中思想发展的学术辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Expanding our horizons for new discourses about ʾIslām and Islamic living The reception of the alternative voice by Afrikaans readers (1994–2002) Radical inclusivity and the journey on the way to somewhere [irgendwohin unterwegs] The ecclesiastical crisis of human sexuality: ‘Critical solidarity’, ‘critical distance’ or ‘critical engagement’ Ecclesia reformata semper reformanda: W.A. (Wim) Dreyer and the reformation of the Netherdutch Reformed Church of Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1