Paul Meyvaеrt and Paul Devos: Duo Candelabra Cyrillomethodiana

Stilyana Batalova
{"title":"Paul Meyvaеrt and Paul Devos: Duo Candelabra Cyrillomethodiana","authors":"Stilyana Batalova","doi":"10.33077/uw.25448730.zbkh.2023.764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper outlines in historiographical perspective Paul Meyvaert (1921–2015) and Paul Devos’ (1913–1995) contributions to the classification of the Latin hagiographical legends about Sts Cyril and Methodius. The author analyzes their three joint studies from 1955–1956. These studies first introduced into academic use the most comprehensive medieval copy of the so-called Italian legend discovered to date. They also explored its links to the literary activity of Leo of Ostia (1046–1115). Through P.Meyvaert’s fortuitous discovery, the two scholars proved that only the second redaction of the Italian Legend has survived. As a result of their research, they narrowed down the chronological limits of the appearance of its first redaction, compiled by Johannes Hymmonides and Gauderic of Velletri. They studied the manuscript tradition (of the Italian Legend) and proved that the reference to the episcopal rank of St Cyril and St Methodius is a late interpolation in the text. They established what influence Leo of Ostia ‘s redaction of the Italian Legend exerted on the literary production in the Benedictine monastery of San Clemente a Casauria in the last quarter of the 12th century and on some legendaries containing abridged legendae novae of the 13th and 14th centuries. P. Meyvaert and P. Devos also attempted to clarify the place of the so-called Moravian legend in the nexus of Latin Cyrillo-Methodian legends of the Bohemian lands. The paper discusses the contributions of Meyvaert and Devos from the perspective of the development of Cyrillo-Methodian studies. It analyses the main approaches used for the successful solutions to age-old issues and the hypotheses that provoked debate with Jaroslav Ludvikovský.","PeriodicalId":33789,"journal":{"name":"Z Badan nad Ksiazka i Ksiegozbiorami Historycznymi","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Z Badan nad Ksiazka i Ksiegozbiorami Historycznymi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33077/uw.25448730.zbkh.2023.764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper outlines in historiographical perspective Paul Meyvaert (1921–2015) and Paul Devos’ (1913–1995) contributions to the classification of the Latin hagiographical legends about Sts Cyril and Methodius. The author analyzes their three joint studies from 1955–1956. These studies first introduced into academic use the most comprehensive medieval copy of the so-called Italian legend discovered to date. They also explored its links to the literary activity of Leo of Ostia (1046–1115). Through P.Meyvaert’s fortuitous discovery, the two scholars proved that only the second redaction of the Italian Legend has survived. As a result of their research, they narrowed down the chronological limits of the appearance of its first redaction, compiled by Johannes Hymmonides and Gauderic of Velletri. They studied the manuscript tradition (of the Italian Legend) and proved that the reference to the episcopal rank of St Cyril and St Methodius is a late interpolation in the text. They established what influence Leo of Ostia ‘s redaction of the Italian Legend exerted on the literary production in the Benedictine monastery of San Clemente a Casauria in the last quarter of the 12th century and on some legendaries containing abridged legendae novae of the 13th and 14th centuries. P. Meyvaert and P. Devos also attempted to clarify the place of the so-called Moravian legend in the nexus of Latin Cyrillo-Methodian legends of the Bohemian lands. The paper discusses the contributions of Meyvaert and Devos from the perspective of the development of Cyrillo-Methodian studies. It analyses the main approaches used for the successful solutions to age-old issues and the hypotheses that provoked debate with Jaroslav Ludvikovský.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paul meyvavirrt和Paul Devos:双人烛台Cyrillomethodiana
本文从历史学的角度概述了Paul Meyvaert(1921-2015)和Paul Devos(1913-1995)对关于st Cyril和Methodius的拉丁圣徒传说分类的贡献。作者分析了他们在1955-1956年间的三次共同研究。这些研究首次将迄今为止发现的最全面的中世纪意大利传说副本引入学术应用。他们还探讨了它与奥斯提亚的利奥(1046-1115)的文学活动的联系。通过P.Meyvaert的偶然发现,两位学者证明,《意大利传说》只有第二版被保存了下来。根据他们的研究,他们缩小了由约翰内斯·海蒙尼德斯和韦莱特里的高德利克编纂的第一版《圣经》出现的时间范围。他们研究了(意大利传说的)手稿传统,并证明了圣西里尔和圣梅多迪乌斯的主教等级是在文本中后期插入的。他们确定了奥斯提亚的利奥对意大利传说的修订对12世纪最后25年圣克莱门特卡萨里亚本笃会修道院的文学创作以及对13世纪和14世纪的一些包含删节的新传说的传说的影响。P. Meyvaert和P. Devos还试图澄清所谓的摩拉维亚传说在波希米亚土地上的拉丁西里尔-美索蒂亚传说的联系中的地位。本文从西里尔-卫理研究发展的角度探讨了梅瓦维特和德沃斯的贡献。它分析了成功解决老问题所使用的主要方法和引起与Jaroslav辩论的假设Ludvikovský。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Z Badan nad Ksiazka i Ksiegozbiorami Historycznymi
Z Badan nad Ksiazka i Ksiegozbiorami Historycznymi Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Some Remarks about the Cyrillo-Methodian Bibliography in Bulgaria and its Electronic Version Еditions of the Cyrillo-Methodian Research Centre at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences for the period 2021–2022 The Slavonic Manuscript Heritage of the Zograf Monastery on Mount Athos ‒ Past and Present Cyril and Methodius. Images. Memory. Identity Photocopies of Lost Manuscript Copies of the Prologue Vita of Methodius, Bishop of Great Moravia, in the Scientific Archive of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1