A Randomized Trial of Total Drain Volume in Post-Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) Breast Cancer Patient Using Songket Incision Compare to Stewart Incision plus Axillary Anchor at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang

Meigi Medika, Nur Qodir
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Total Drain Volume in Post-Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) Breast Cancer Patient Using Songket Incision Compare to Stewart Incision plus Axillary Anchor at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang","authors":"Meigi Medika, Nur Qodir","doi":"10.33371/ijoc.v17i3.981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women globally. In Indonesia, a total of 65,858 new cases with a 22,530 mortality rate were reported in 2020. To overcome this health condition, surgery serves as the primary treatment, with post-mastectomy complications frequently involving seroma formation, exacerbating post-operative problems. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the total drain volume in post-MRM breast cancer patients using Songket incision compared to Stewart incision plus axillary anchor. This experiment was conducted to determine the optimal surgical option for breast cancer patients.Methods: A two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in female patients with breast cancer treated at the Surgical Oncology Division of Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang between April to May 2022. Patients were blindly assigned to one of the two arms, namely the Songket incision and Stewart incision plus an axillary anchor. The eligible sample consisted of patients diagnosed with breast cancer who were slated for Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) surgery, willing to participate, and signed informed consent. The primary outcome of this study was total drain volume, while the secondary objective encompassed the length of treatment selected.Results: A total of 26 patients participated in this study (n=13 in each arm). The total drain volume using the Stewart incision was 378.07 ± 219.57, compared to 174.23 ± 97.44 ml for the Songket design (p< 0.001). The mean length of treatment was 4.46 ± 0.77 days in the Stewart incision plus axillary anchor group and 3.23 ± 0.43 days in the Songket incision design (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Songket incision was the best surgical option for breast cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":13489,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Cancer","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33371/ijoc.v17i3.981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women globally. In Indonesia, a total of 65,858 new cases with a 22,530 mortality rate were reported in 2020. To overcome this health condition, surgery serves as the primary treatment, with post-mastectomy complications frequently involving seroma formation, exacerbating post-operative problems. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the total drain volume in post-MRM breast cancer patients using Songket incision compared to Stewart incision plus axillary anchor. This experiment was conducted to determine the optimal surgical option for breast cancer patients.Methods: A two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in female patients with breast cancer treated at the Surgical Oncology Division of Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang between April to May 2022. Patients were blindly assigned to one of the two arms, namely the Songket incision and Stewart incision plus an axillary anchor. The eligible sample consisted of patients diagnosed with breast cancer who were slated for Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) surgery, willing to participate, and signed informed consent. The primary outcome of this study was total drain volume, while the secondary objective encompassed the length of treatment selected.Results: A total of 26 patients participated in this study (n=13 in each arm). The total drain volume using the Stewart incision was 378.07 ± 219.57, compared to 174.23 ± 97.44 ml for the Songket design (p< 0.001). The mean length of treatment was 4.46 ± 0.77 days in the Stewart incision plus axillary anchor group and 3.23 ± 0.43 days in the Songket incision design (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Songket incision was the best surgical option for breast cancer patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨港Dr. Mohammad Hoesin医院改良乳房根治术(MRM)后采用Songket切口与Stewart切口加腋窝锚的总引流量的随机试验
背景:乳腺癌是全球女性中最常见的恶性肿瘤。在印度尼西亚,2020年共报告了65,858例新病例,其中22,530例死亡。为了克服这种健康状况,手术是主要的治疗方法,乳房切除术后的并发症经常包括血清肿形成,加剧了术后问题。因此,本研究旨在评估mrm后乳腺癌患者采用Songket切口与Stewart切口加腋窝锚的总引流量。本实验旨在确定乳腺癌患者的最佳手术选择。方法:在2022年4月至5月期间,在Mohammad Hoesin医院巨港外科肿瘤科接受治疗的女性乳腺癌患者中进行了一项两组随机对照试验。患者被盲目分配到两个臂中的一个,即Songket切口和Stewart切口加腋窝锚。符合条件的样本包括诊断为乳腺癌的患者,他们计划进行改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)手术,愿意参加,并签署知情同意书。本研究的主要结果是总引流量,而次要目标包括所选择的治疗时间。结果:共有26例患者参与了本研究(每组n=13)。Stewart切口的总引流量为378.07±219.57 ml,而Songket设计的总引流量为174.23±97.44 ml (p<0.001)。Stewart切口加腋锚组的平均治疗时间为4.46±0.77天,Songket切口组的平均治疗时间为3.23±0.43天(p <0.001)。结论:松ket切口是乳腺癌患者的最佳手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase as a Serum Biomarker in Detecting Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Literature Review Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Mammography Interpretation by Breast Radiologists, Non-Breast Radiologists, and Senior Residents Factors Influencing Distress and Coping Strategies Among Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumor at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Major Microbiota Profile of Breast Cancer From Faecal Specimen and Cancerous Breast Tissue: A Comprehensive Systematic Review Recent Technological Advancements in Respiratory Gating Devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1