Общее благо в контексте солидаризации при военных процессах

{"title":"Общее благо в контексте солидаризации при военных процессах","authors":"","doi":"10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common good principle is shown as a component of solidarity in military processes context, which is confirmed by current situation in Russia over the past two years. Common good is a principle that prevail over principles of conflicting private selfish and group interests in practices and institutes. Private selfish and group good principle (nihilism towards common good) is opposed to common good. Not only trust, solidarity, law, institutes, politics, but society survival in the face of common disaster is impossible without common good principle. Weak sprouts of solidarization have emerged since autumn of 2022. Various authors’ researches and data allow us to state that solidarity (empirically manifested, among other things, even in increase in trust in the authorities) coexists with a social split. Many common good understandings and interpretations, and sides of the failed dialogue create their own common good discourses. A split occurs between them, understood as a socially (and politically) non-optimal discrepancy between interests of certain groups with impossibility of its civilized overcoming, often with impossibility or limited opportunity for dialogue between the sides. Solidarity and the common good are a priori impossible in a split. It is very likely that in the current extreme time for Russia, common good principle will be developed. Russian sociality can change significantly, passing these crosses, which obviously require in-depth and thorough research.","PeriodicalId":31282,"journal":{"name":"Vlast'' Moskva","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vlast'' Moskva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common good principle is shown as a component of solidarity in military processes context, which is confirmed by current situation in Russia over the past two years. Common good is a principle that prevail over principles of conflicting private selfish and group interests in practices and institutes. Private selfish and group good principle (nihilism towards common good) is opposed to common good. Not only trust, solidarity, law, institutes, politics, but society survival in the face of common disaster is impossible without common good principle. Weak sprouts of solidarization have emerged since autumn of 2022. Various authors’ researches and data allow us to state that solidarity (empirically manifested, among other things, even in increase in trust in the authorities) coexists with a social split. Many common good understandings and interpretations, and sides of the failed dialogue create their own common good discourses. A split occurs between them, understood as a socially (and politically) non-optimal discrepancy between interests of certain groups with impossibility of its civilized overcoming, often with impossibility or limited opportunity for dialogue between the sides. Solidarity and the common good are a priori impossible in a split. It is very likely that in the current extreme time for Russia, common good principle will be developed. Russian sociality can change significantly, passing these crosses, which obviously require in-depth and thorough research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在军事进程中团结一致的背景下共同利益
共同利益原则是军事进程背景下团结的组成部分,这一点在过去两年俄罗斯的现状中得到了证实。共同利益是一种原则,在实践和制度上优于个人自私和集团利益冲突的原则。个人自私和集团利益原则(对共同利益的虚无主义)与共同利益相对立。但是,如果没有共同的善的原则,社会在共同的灾难面前生存是不可能的。自2022年秋季以来,已经出现了微弱的团结萌芽。许多作者的研究和数据使我们能够断言,团结(从经验上看,在其他方面,甚至体现在对当局的信任增加上)与社会分裂并存。许多共同利益的理解和解释,以及失败对话的各方创造了他们自己的共同利益话语。他们之间发生了分裂,被理解为某些群体的利益之间的社会(和政治)非最佳差异,这种差异不可能被文明地克服,双方之间的对话机会往往是不可能或有限的。在分裂中,团结和共同利益是先天不可能的。很有可能在俄罗斯目前的极端时期,共同利益原则将得到发展。通过这些交叉,俄罗斯社会可以发生重大变化,这显然需要深入而彻底的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Демографическое развитие России: тупик или надежда? (демографические заметки пессимиста) Традиционные российские духовно-нравственные ценности: результаты анализа нормативно-правовых актов «Умное государство» между глобализацией и деглобализацией: особенности электронных резидентов и цифровых кочевников Интеграционные процессы в постконфликтных обществах Причины и механизмы внедрения «зеленой повестки» в систему госуправления
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1