Analgesic and safety analysis of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.21
Jiayu Lu, Taihao Cui, Zhaoxiang Yu, Wei Zheng, Wei He
{"title":"Analgesic and safety analysis of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block","authors":"Jiayu Lu, Taihao Cui, Zhaoxiang Yu, Wei Zheng, Wei He","doi":"10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in intercostal space.Methods: A total of 90 patients were scheduled to undergo upper limb surgery and divided into control and study groups, respectively. Patients in control group were given ropivacaine nerve block, while those in study group were given ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine mixture nerve block. The efficiency of sensory and motor block, secondary evaluation of block effect, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at different postoperative moments, remedial analgesia and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups after 30 min of drug injection.Results: The success rate of sensory block was not significantly different between control group (91.11 %) and study group (93.33 %; χ2 = 0.155, p > 0.05) but success rate of the motor block was significantly higher in study group (93.33 %) than in control group (71.11 %; χ2 = 7.601, p < 0.05). Compared with control group, onset of sensory block and motor block were significantly shorter in study group, while the duration of sensory block and motor block was significantly longer (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in study group than control group (p < 0.05). The number of self-administered analgesia, number of patients, dose used, and overall incidence of adverse reactions in study group were significantly lower than in control group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine, when administered together, have a significant anesthetic effect during nerve block, which is safe and enhances their analgesic effect. However, the mechanism of improving analgesic effect of the combined plan, using a larger number of samples should be further investigated.","PeriodicalId":23347,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v22i9.21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate analgesic effect and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in intercostal space.Methods: A total of 90 patients were scheduled to undergo upper limb surgery and divided into control and study groups, respectively. Patients in control group were given ropivacaine nerve block, while those in study group were given ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine mixture nerve block. The efficiency of sensory and motor block, secondary evaluation of block effect, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at different postoperative moments, remedial analgesia and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups after 30 min of drug injection.Results: The success rate of sensory block was not significantly different between control group (91.11 %) and study group (93.33 %; χ2 = 0.155, p > 0.05) but success rate of the motor block was significantly higher in study group (93.33 %) than in control group (71.11 %; χ2 = 7.601, p < 0.05). Compared with control group, onset of sensory block and motor block were significantly shorter in study group, while the duration of sensory block and motor block was significantly longer (p < 0.05). The VAS scores at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in study group than control group (p < 0.05). The number of self-administered analgesia, number of patients, dose used, and overall incidence of adverse reactions in study group were significantly lower than in control group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine, when administered together, have a significant anesthetic effect during nerve block, which is safe and enhances their analgesic effect. However, the mechanism of improving analgesic effect of the combined plan, using a larger number of samples should be further investigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因用于超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞的镇痛及安全性分析
目的:探讨右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因在超声引导下肋间隙臂丛阻滞中的镇痛效果及安全性。方法:90例患者计划行上肢手术,分为对照组和研究组。对照组患者给予罗哌卡因神经阻滞,研究组患者给予罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定混合物神经阻滞。比较两组患者术后不同时刻的感觉和运动阻滞效率、阻滞效果二次评价、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、药物注射30 min后的补救镇痛及不良反应。结果:对照组(91.11%)与研究组(93.33%)感觉阻滞成功率无显著差异;χ2 = 0.155, p >0.05),但运动阻滞成功率(93.33%)明显高于对照组(71.11%);χ2 = 7.601, p <0.05)。与对照组比较,研究组感觉阻滞和运动阻滞的发作时间显著缩短,而感觉阻滞和运动阻滞的持续时间显著延长(p <0.05)。研究组术后12、24、48 h VAS评分均显著低于对照组(p <0.05)。研究组自我镇痛次数、患者数量、使用剂量、不良反应总发生率均显著低于对照组(p <0.05)。结论:右美托咪定与罗哌卡因联用在神经阻滞过程中具有明显的麻醉作用,安全且能增强镇痛效果。然而,联合方案提高镇痛效果的机制,使用更大的样本量还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
490
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: We seek to encourage pharmaceutical and allied research of tropical and international relevance and to foster multidisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare professionals. We publish articles in pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines (including biotechnology, cell and molecular biology, drug utilization including adverse drug events, medical and other life sciences, and related engineering fields). Although primarily devoted to original research papers, we welcome reviews on current topics of special interest and relevance.
期刊最新文献
Toxicological evaluation of Sargassum plagiophyllum extract in male mice Safety and efficacy of salvianolate injection in preventing deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement Synergistic effect of continuous care and cephalosporin antimicrobials in managing pulmonary infections in acute stroke patients: A comprehensive study Effect of paclitaxel octreotide conjugate on human ovarian paclitaxel-resistant cell xenograft tumor model and the mechanism underlying reversal of paclitaxel resistance Nectin-3 and Nectin-4: potential prognostic biomarkers for therapeutic targeting of cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1