Redesigning Research Guides

IF 1.5 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Technology and Libraries Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.5860/ital.v42i3.15535
Jessica McClure, Carl Hess, David Marsicano
{"title":"Redesigning Research Guides","authors":"Jessica McClure, Carl Hess, David Marsicano","doi":"10.5860/ital.v42i3.15535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the University of Memphis, a team of librarians and library staff formed the Research Guides Redesign Team (RGRT) to redesign, organize, and evaluate the University Libraries’ (UL) research guides. The purpose of the project was to ensure that the new design of the research guides homepage was intuitive to use. While it is impossible to ensure absolute usability for every user, this usability study attempts to eradicate the most common interface issues in community experiences at the University of Memphis. The RGRT conducted usability testing to evaluate the effectiveness of the new standardized format, grouped headings, and the appearance of the interface. The RGRT worked within the limitations of Springshare’s software to create the design and then chose five users to complete various task scenarios. Upon analysis of the users’ ability to complete the tasks, the RGRT discovered that overall, the design was effective, but they did make a few minor changes. This study describes the process and includes the original design, the new design, edits made after usability testing was conducted, and plans for future testing.","PeriodicalId":50361,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology and Libraries","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology and Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v42i3.15535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the University of Memphis, a team of librarians and library staff formed the Research Guides Redesign Team (RGRT) to redesign, organize, and evaluate the University Libraries’ (UL) research guides. The purpose of the project was to ensure that the new design of the research guides homepage was intuitive to use. While it is impossible to ensure absolute usability for every user, this usability study attempts to eradicate the most common interface issues in community experiences at the University of Memphis. The RGRT conducted usability testing to evaluate the effectiveness of the new standardized format, grouped headings, and the appearance of the interface. The RGRT worked within the limitations of Springshare’s software to create the design and then chose five users to complete various task scenarios. Upon analysis of the users’ ability to complete the tasks, the RGRT discovered that overall, the design was effective, but they did make a few minor changes. This study describes the process and includes the original design, the new design, edits made after usability testing was conducted, and plans for future testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新设计研究指南
在孟菲斯大学,一组图书馆员和图书馆工作人员组成了研究指南重新设计团队(RGRT),重新设计、组织和评估大学图书馆(UL)的研究指南。该项目的目的是确保研究指南主页的新设计直观易用。虽然不可能确保每个用户的绝对可用性,但这项可用性研究试图消除孟菲斯大学社区体验中最常见的界面问题。RGRT进行了可用性测试,以评估新的标准化格式、分组标题和界面外观的有效性。RGRT在Springshare软件的限制下创建了设计,然后选择了五个用户来完成各种任务场景。在分析了用户完成任务的能力后,RGRT发现,总体而言,设计是有效的,但他们确实做了一些小的改变。本研究描述了整个过程,包括原始设计、新设计、可用性测试后的编辑以及未来测试的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Technology and Libraries
Information Technology and Libraries 管理科学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information Technology and Libraries publishes original material related to all aspects of information technology in all types of libraries. Topic areas include, but are not limited to, library automation, digital libraries, metadata, identity management, distributed systems and networks, computer security, intellectual property rights, technical standards, geographic information systems, desktop applications, information discovery tools, web-scale library services, cloud computing, digital preservation, data curation, virtualization, search-engine optimization, emerging technologies, social networking, open data, the semantic web, mobile services and applications, usability, universal access to technology, library consortia, vendor relations, and digital humanities.
期刊最新文献
Response to "From ChatGPT to CatGPT" To Thine Own 3D Selfie Be True Towards an Open Source-first Praxis in Libraries Response to "From ChatGPT to CatGPT" Drained-pool Politics Versus Digital Libraries in U.S. Cyberspace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1