ON THE FORTHCOMING OBONEZHIE VOLUMES OF THE SVOD RUSSKOGO FOLKLORA SERIES: MATERIALS FROM THE 1931–1932 EXPEDITIONS OF THE FOLKLORE SECTION OF THE INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF PEOPLES IN THE COLLECTION OF THE INSTITUTE OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE (PUSHKINSKII DOM) IN ST. PETERSBURG
{"title":"ON THE FORTHCOMING OBONEZHIE VOLUMES OF THE SVOD RUSSKOGO FOLKLORA SERIES: MATERIALS FROM THE 1931–1932 EXPEDITIONS OF THE FOLKLORE SECTION OF THE INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF PEOPLES IN THE COLLECTION OF THE INSTITUTE OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE (PUSHKINSKII DOM) IN ST. PETERSBURG","authors":"Svetlana V. Podrezova","doi":"10.31860/2712-7591-2023-3-130-148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers for the first time the history, methods, and results of two folklore expeditions to the Zaonezhie region, which took place in the summer of 1931 and in the winter of 1931/1932. The expeditions were led by members of the Folklore Section of the Institute for the Study of Peoples of the USSR and the Karelian Research Institute. Two students of the Leningrad State Historical and Linguistic Institute, M. B. Kaminskaia and N. N. Tiaponkina, took part in the expeditions. Among other things, the expeditions were especially charged with collecting materials on the current state of the epic tradition and the “social function of the epic.” The expedition of 1931 was intended to provide field practice experience to students. For that matter it involved many participants and solved a wide range of problems. Members of the expedition took records only in notebooks. The 1931–1932 winter expedition was professional, so it took records even on wax cylinders. The article summarizes data concerning both expeditions and pays special attention to the materials on the Russian epic tradition. It reconstructs the route of the winter expedition, provides an inventory of the phonographic collection, and reviews the handwritten records. The analysis of the materials showed that the young specialists adopted the work methods used by Leningrad folklorists: searching for masters of epics performance, working with both the best and ordinary performers, practicing separate handwriting of the text (“in 2 pencils”) and sound recording, collecting biographies of performers, taking detailed interviews about the experience of mastering of the epic tradition and the experience of performing. These methods made it possible to accumulate important material about the folklore and ethnography of the Zaonezhie region.","PeriodicalId":499688,"journal":{"name":"Slovesnostʹ i istoriâ","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovesnostʹ i istoriâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31860/2712-7591-2023-3-130-148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article considers for the first time the history, methods, and results of two folklore expeditions to the Zaonezhie region, which took place in the summer of 1931 and in the winter of 1931/1932. The expeditions were led by members of the Folklore Section of the Institute for the Study of Peoples of the USSR and the Karelian Research Institute. Two students of the Leningrad State Historical and Linguistic Institute, M. B. Kaminskaia and N. N. Tiaponkina, took part in the expeditions. Among other things, the expeditions were especially charged with collecting materials on the current state of the epic tradition and the “social function of the epic.” The expedition of 1931 was intended to provide field practice experience to students. For that matter it involved many participants and solved a wide range of problems. Members of the expedition took records only in notebooks. The 1931–1932 winter expedition was professional, so it took records even on wax cylinders. The article summarizes data concerning both expeditions and pays special attention to the materials on the Russian epic tradition. It reconstructs the route of the winter expedition, provides an inventory of the phonographic collection, and reviews the handwritten records. The analysis of the materials showed that the young specialists adopted the work methods used by Leningrad folklorists: searching for masters of epics performance, working with both the best and ordinary performers, practicing separate handwriting of the text (“in 2 pencils”) and sound recording, collecting biographies of performers, taking detailed interviews about the experience of mastering of the epic tradition and the experience of performing. These methods made it possible to accumulate important material about the folklore and ethnography of the Zaonezhie region.
本文首次考察了1931年夏季和1931/1932年冬季在枣内则地区进行的两次民俗考察的历史、方法和结果。这次考察是由苏联民族研究所民俗学科和卡累利阿研究所的成员领导的。列宁格勒国家历史和语言研究所的两名学生M. B. Kaminskaia和N. N. Tiaponkina参加了这次考察。在其他任务中,探险队特别负责收集关于史诗传统现状和“史诗的社会功能”的材料。1931年的考察旨在为学生提供实地实践经验。就此而言,它涉及许多参与者,解决了广泛的问题。探险队成员只在笔记本上做记录。1931-1932年的冬季探险是专业的,所以他们甚至用蜡筒记录。本文对两次远征的资料进行了总结,并特别关注了有关俄罗斯史诗传统的资料。它重建了冬季探险的路线,提供了留声机收藏的清单,并审查了手写记录。对材料的分析表明,青年专家们采用了列宁格勒民俗学家的工作方法:寻找史诗表演大师,与最优秀的和普通的表演者一起工作,分别练习文本的书写(“用两支铅笔”)和录音,收集表演者的传记,详细采访掌握史诗传统的经验和表演经验。这些方法为积累枣内芝地区民俗和民族志的重要资料提供了可能。