A Russian protectorate for the Boer republics. A rejected idea for countering British imperialism

Q3 Arts and Humanities Vostok (Oriens) Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31857/s086919080024664-7
Boris M. Gorelik
{"title":"A Russian protectorate for the Boer republics. A rejected idea for countering British imperialism","authors":"Boris M. Gorelik","doi":"10.31857/s086919080024664-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African War, also known as the Anglo-Boer War of 1899-1902, was one of the most important armed conflicts of the age of imperialism. The war evoked an immense public response in Russia; not even the power circles remained unmoved. Russian public opinion supported the struggle for the independence of the Boer republics, the Transvaal and the Orange Free State. For their part, the governments of the two republics convinced their fellow citizens that the Russian Empire, as the initiator of the Hague Peace Conference and the only great power that never had colonies in Africa, would be able to unite other states of Europe and the United States to help the Boers in countering British imperialism. By June 1900, it had become clear that the Great Powers would not take military action in defence of the South African republics. Moreover, they were unable to overlook their geopolitical differences in order to offer collective mediation or good offices to the belligerents. On behalf of the official Boer delegation, who was visiting the United States, the Transvaal envoy conveyed to the foreign offices of Russia and its ally France a request for a joint protectorate over the Transvaal and the Orange Free State. Documentary evidence of this demarche, which has not yet received sufficient coverage in historiography, has been preserved in the archive of the Transvaal envoy Leyds, as well as in the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Appealing to Russia and France, the Boer delegates assumed that these powers, for humanitarian reasons, would provide friendly guardianship to the two republics in South Africa. However, the European governments of the period understood protectorate as a form of colonial dependence. Besides, Russia and France did not want a military confrontation with the mighty British Empire for the sake of the Boer states that were outside the sphere of their political and colonial interests. The attempt of the representatives of the Transvaal and the Orange Free State to secure a Russo-French protectorate for their republics was predestined to fail.","PeriodicalId":39193,"journal":{"name":"Vostok (Oriens)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vostok (Oriens)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s086919080024664-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South African War, also known as the Anglo-Boer War of 1899-1902, was one of the most important armed conflicts of the age of imperialism. The war evoked an immense public response in Russia; not even the power circles remained unmoved. Russian public opinion supported the struggle for the independence of the Boer republics, the Transvaal and the Orange Free State. For their part, the governments of the two republics convinced their fellow citizens that the Russian Empire, as the initiator of the Hague Peace Conference and the only great power that never had colonies in Africa, would be able to unite other states of Europe and the United States to help the Boers in countering British imperialism. By June 1900, it had become clear that the Great Powers would not take military action in defence of the South African republics. Moreover, they were unable to overlook their geopolitical differences in order to offer collective mediation or good offices to the belligerents. On behalf of the official Boer delegation, who was visiting the United States, the Transvaal envoy conveyed to the foreign offices of Russia and its ally France a request for a joint protectorate over the Transvaal and the Orange Free State. Documentary evidence of this demarche, which has not yet received sufficient coverage in historiography, has been preserved in the archive of the Transvaal envoy Leyds, as well as in the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Appealing to Russia and France, the Boer delegates assumed that these powers, for humanitarian reasons, would provide friendly guardianship to the two republics in South Africa. However, the European governments of the period understood protectorate as a form of colonial dependence. Besides, Russia and France did not want a military confrontation with the mighty British Empire for the sake of the Boer states that were outside the sphere of their political and colonial interests. The attempt of the representatives of the Transvaal and the Orange Free State to secure a Russo-French protectorate for their republics was predestined to fail.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布尔共和国的俄罗斯保护国。反对英帝国主义的被拒绝的想法
南非战争,也被称为1899-1902年的英布战争,是帝国主义时代最重要的武装冲突之一。这场战争在俄罗斯引起了巨大的公众反应;就连权力圈也不是无动于衷。俄国舆论支持布尔共和国、德兰士瓦和奥兰治自由邦的独立斗争。在这一方面,两个共和国的政府使他们的同胞相信,作为海牙和平会议的发起者和唯一一个从未在非洲拥有殖民地的大国,俄罗斯帝国将能够联合欧洲和美国的其他国家,帮助布尔人对抗英帝国主义。到1900年6月,情况已经很清楚,列强不会采取军事行动来保卫南非共和国。此外,他们不能忽视地缘政治上的差异,以便向交战各方提供集体调解或斡旋。德兰士瓦特使代表正在美国访问的布尔官方代表团,向俄罗斯及其盟友法国的外交部转达了对德兰士瓦和奥兰治自由邦的联合保护国的请求。这一方针的书面证据尚未在史学中得到充分的报道,但保存在德兰士瓦特使莱兹的档案中,以及俄罗斯帝国外交政策档案中。布尔代表向俄罗斯和法国提出呼吁,认为出于人道主义原因,这些国家将友好地监护南非的两个共和国。然而,这一时期的欧洲政府将保护国理解为殖民依赖的一种形式。此外,俄罗斯和法国不希望与强大的大英帝国发生军事对抗,因为布尔国家不在他们的政治和殖民利益范围之内。德兰士瓦省和奥兰治自由邦的代表为其共和国争取俄法保护国的企图注定要失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vostok (Oriens)
Vostok (Oriens) Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Democratic Republic of the Congo: the Rise of Islamic Radicalism At the Origins of European Oriental Studies: an Unknown Letter by Benjamin Schultze to Georg Jacob Kehr The Problem of the Eu's Defense Identity: the Peacekeeping Experience in Africa Overseas ports of China: evolution, geography, investment structure. Stylistics of Amaravati and Poetics of “Lalitavistara”: Comparative Analysis of Visual and Textual Narrative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1