Architectural features of the Ancient Egyptian rock-cut tomb of Kaemnefret (LG 63) on the Eastern Field of the Giza Necropolis

Q3 Arts and Humanities Vostok (Oriens) Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31857/s086919080024167-0
Sergey V. Vetokhov
{"title":"Architectural features of the Ancient Egyptian rock-cut tomb of Kaemnefret (LG 63) on the Eastern Field of the Giza Necropolis","authors":"Sergey V. Vetokhov","doi":"10.31857/s086919080024167-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the structural and planning aspects of the ancient Egyptian rock-cut tomb of royal official Kaemnefret (LG 63) in the Eastern Field of the Giza Necropolis, including two hypotheses of plan development, characteristics of the burial shafts, possible reasons for the absence of “false doors”, purpose of the two passages from room 63A to room 63B and identity of the four statues. The distinctive feature of the tomb is the location of the mouth of a burial shaft outside the chapel, which is not typical for rock-cut tombs and may be an imitation of a mastaba, as proved by the design of some burial shafts. The main question addressed in the article concerns the order in which the two groups of shafts located in rooms 63A and 63B were constructed. Thus, two hypotheses on the development of the tomb were suggested. The main hypothesis supports the idea of the primary construction of the shafts in room 63B and only the subsequent emergence of additional burial shafts in room 63A. The alternative hypothesis is based on the idea of a reverse sequence. The absence of a false door in the tomb is most possibly related to its destruction during the reconstruction process; previously, it had probably existed in place of one of the two passages to room 63B. As a result, most of the architectural criteria allow to date the tomb fairly broadly to the V–VIth Dynasties and only a few details allow to narrow the dating to the late Vth – VIth Dynasties.","PeriodicalId":39193,"journal":{"name":"Vostok (Oriens)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vostok (Oriens)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s086919080024167-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyses the structural and planning aspects of the ancient Egyptian rock-cut tomb of royal official Kaemnefret (LG 63) in the Eastern Field of the Giza Necropolis, including two hypotheses of plan development, characteristics of the burial shafts, possible reasons for the absence of “false doors”, purpose of the two passages from room 63A to room 63B and identity of the four statues. The distinctive feature of the tomb is the location of the mouth of a burial shaft outside the chapel, which is not typical for rock-cut tombs and may be an imitation of a mastaba, as proved by the design of some burial shafts. The main question addressed in the article concerns the order in which the two groups of shafts located in rooms 63A and 63B were constructed. Thus, two hypotheses on the development of the tomb were suggested. The main hypothesis supports the idea of the primary construction of the shafts in room 63B and only the subsequent emergence of additional burial shafts in room 63A. The alternative hypothesis is based on the idea of a reverse sequence. The absence of a false door in the tomb is most possibly related to its destruction during the reconstruction process; previously, it had probably existed in place of one of the two passages to room 63B. As a result, most of the architectural criteria allow to date the tomb fairly broadly to the V–VIth Dynasties and only a few details allow to narrow the dating to the late Vth – VIth Dynasties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古埃及石刻的Kaemnefret墓(lg63)的建筑特征,位于吉萨墓地的东侧
本文分析了吉萨墓地东部地区古埃及皇家官员Kaemnefret (LG 63)的岩石切割坟墓的结构和规划方面,包括两个规划发展的假设,墓葬轴的特征,没有“假门”的可能原因,从63A房间到63B房间的两条通道的目的以及四个雕像的身份。该墓的独特之处在于墓口位于教堂外,这在岩石切割的坟墓中并不常见,可能是对马斯塔巴的模仿,一些墓口的设计证明了这一点。文章所讨论的主要问题涉及位于63A和63B房间的两组竖井的建造顺序。因此,对陵墓的发展提出了两种假设。主要的假设支持63B室的竖井的初步建造,只是63A室随后出现了额外的埋葬竖井的想法。另一种假设是基于反向序列的思想。墓中没有假门很可能与重建过程中被破坏有关;以前,它可能存在于通往63B房间的两条通道中的一条。因此,大多数建筑标准允许将坟墓的年代相当广泛地追溯到五至六朝,只有少数细节允许将日期缩小到五至六朝晚期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vostok (Oriens)
Vostok (Oriens) Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Democratic Republic of the Congo: the Rise of Islamic Radicalism At the Origins of European Oriental Studies: an Unknown Letter by Benjamin Schultze to Georg Jacob Kehr The Problem of the Eu's Defense Identity: the Peacekeeping Experience in Africa Overseas ports of China: evolution, geography, investment structure. Stylistics of Amaravati and Poetics of “Lalitavistara”: Comparative Analysis of Visual and Textual Narrative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1