Coffee is more than flavor, the creation of a coffee character wheel

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Sensory Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1111/joss.12886
Simon D. Williams, Danilo de Andrade, Lei Liu
{"title":"Coffee is more than flavor, the creation of a coffee character wheel","authors":"Simon D. Williams,&nbsp;Danilo de Andrade,&nbsp;Lei Liu","doi":"10.1111/joss.12886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Coffee is more than flavor. Though many articles focus on assessing coffee's flavor, the coffee characteristics for the acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste form part of the industry-standard assessment. The existing coffee flavor wheels provide commonly used terms for the assessment. However, there is limited discussion about the coffee acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste character. In this study, the terms used for describing coffee acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste were collated from published literature, coffee sensory panels, and internet material. A total of 679 unique sensory terms were identified for acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste and correlated into word maps. Based on word relationships and usage, the number of terms was reduced to a total of 95 for acidity, mouthfeel, aftertaste, and an overall grouping for shared terms. The reduced terms were arranged onto a coffee character wheel organized from broad to specific. The created character wheel provides a concise list of terms for coffee cuppers to assess acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>The coffee character wheel compliments the currently published coffee flavor wheels to provide explicit descriptors commonly used in the coffee industry. In addition to flavor, acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste are also used to assess coffee quality. Many sensory terms have been used to describe these attributes, but these used terms have not been summarized or discussed. Analysis of the used terms can assist in creating a common language surrounding the coffee character. The broad to specific terms on this coffee character wheel can help coffee cuppers to describe coffee acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.12886","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coffee is more than flavor. Though many articles focus on assessing coffee's flavor, the coffee characteristics for the acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste form part of the industry-standard assessment. The existing coffee flavor wheels provide commonly used terms for the assessment. However, there is limited discussion about the coffee acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste character. In this study, the terms used for describing coffee acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste were collated from published literature, coffee sensory panels, and internet material. A total of 679 unique sensory terms were identified for acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste and correlated into word maps. Based on word relationships and usage, the number of terms was reduced to a total of 95 for acidity, mouthfeel, aftertaste, and an overall grouping for shared terms. The reduced terms were arranged onto a coffee character wheel organized from broad to specific. The created character wheel provides a concise list of terms for coffee cuppers to assess acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste.

Practical Applications

The coffee character wheel compliments the currently published coffee flavor wheels to provide explicit descriptors commonly used in the coffee industry. In addition to flavor, acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste are also used to assess coffee quality. Many sensory terms have been used to describe these attributes, but these used terms have not been summarized or discussed. Analysis of the used terms can assist in creating a common language surrounding the coffee character. The broad to specific terms on this coffee character wheel can help coffee cuppers to describe coffee acidity, mouthfeel, and aftertaste.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡不仅仅是一种风味,更是一种咖啡特色的创造。
咖啡不仅仅是风味。尽管许多文章都侧重于评估咖啡的风味,但咖啡的酸度、口感和回味特征也是行业标准评估的一部分。现有的咖啡风味轮提供了常用的评估术语。然而,关于咖啡酸度、口感和回味特征的讨论却很有限。在这项研究中,我们从公开发表的文献、咖啡感官小组和互联网资料中整理了用于描述咖啡酸度、口感和回味的术语。共识别出 679 个关于酸度、口感和余味的独特感官术语,并将其关联到词图中。根据词语关系和使用情况,将酸度、口感和回味的词语数量减少到 95 个,并对共享词语进行了整体分组。缩减后的术语被编排到一个咖啡特征轮上,从宽泛到具体。创建的特征轮为咖啡师评估酸度、口感和回味提供了一个简明的术语列表。 实际应用 咖啡特征表是对目前出版的咖啡风味表的补充,提供了咖啡行业常用的明确描述。除风味外,酸度、口感和回味也用于评估咖啡质量。许多感官术语被用来描述这些属性,但这些术语尚未得到总结或讨论。对这些术语进行分析,有助于围绕咖啡特性创建一种共同语言。这个咖啡特征轮上从广泛到具体的术语可以帮助咖啡师描述咖啡的酸度、口感和回味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations” Rabitti, N. S., Appiani, M., Proserpio, C., Pagliarini, E., & Laureati, M. (2024). How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 39(3), e12915. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12915 Displaying ingredients on healthy snack packaging: A study on visual attention, choice, and purchase intention Normative cortical activation patterns in children distinguishing one or two tactile sensory inputs points: An functional MRI study Pleasantness of fat flavor is decreased in young adults with high perceived stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1