Nonprofit-business collaboration: An empirical-based framework for value creation

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Australian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1177/03128962231201525
Omar Al-Tabbaa
{"title":"Nonprofit-business collaboration: An empirical-based framework for value creation","authors":"Omar Al-Tabbaa","doi":"10.1177/03128962231201525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While interest in nonprofit-business collaboration (NBC) has grown rapidly in the past decades, literature has underexposed the peculiarities of nonprofit organizations (NPOs), compared to the ample attention on the perspective of the firm and the implications for society. In specific, we lack clarity on how NPOs can deliberately seek collaboration with the business sector to foster their organizational viability and economic interests, in addition to their traditional focus on delivering social value and meaningfulness. This active approach has become imperative given the growing uncertainty of government funding and budgetary constraints. However, the proactive involvement in NBC is complex and risky. In this study, we address this dilemma by investigating several NPOs that are active in NBC. Based on the analysis and findings, we developed an empirical-based framework that explains the essence of NPOs’ proactive engagement with the business sector. More specifically, we offer subtle theoretical and empirical investigations of various internal and external contingencies that explain the effectiveness of NPOs in establishing collaboration with firms for value creation. Moreover, we advance the current debate concerning the need to establish a clear distinction between value creation for society (conceived as the sum of benevolent benefits obtained from the collaboration) and for the partners. As such, we showed that the active-in-collaboration NPOs distinguish between different NBC values that include economic benefits (for survival), institutional development (for organizational effectiveness), and transformational for changing business practice (for the fulfillment of mission). Therefore, we shift the focus from the predominating perspectives of society and business to consider NPOs as an active component of this relationship. Together, these findings offer a robust nonprofit-centric foundation that is necessary for NBC practice and theory development. JEL Classification: M1 Business Administration","PeriodicalId":47209,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231201525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While interest in nonprofit-business collaboration (NBC) has grown rapidly in the past decades, literature has underexposed the peculiarities of nonprofit organizations (NPOs), compared to the ample attention on the perspective of the firm and the implications for society. In specific, we lack clarity on how NPOs can deliberately seek collaboration with the business sector to foster their organizational viability and economic interests, in addition to their traditional focus on delivering social value and meaningfulness. This active approach has become imperative given the growing uncertainty of government funding and budgetary constraints. However, the proactive involvement in NBC is complex and risky. In this study, we address this dilemma by investigating several NPOs that are active in NBC. Based on the analysis and findings, we developed an empirical-based framework that explains the essence of NPOs’ proactive engagement with the business sector. More specifically, we offer subtle theoretical and empirical investigations of various internal and external contingencies that explain the effectiveness of NPOs in establishing collaboration with firms for value creation. Moreover, we advance the current debate concerning the need to establish a clear distinction between value creation for society (conceived as the sum of benevolent benefits obtained from the collaboration) and for the partners. As such, we showed that the active-in-collaboration NPOs distinguish between different NBC values that include economic benefits (for survival), institutional development (for organizational effectiveness), and transformational for changing business practice (for the fulfillment of mission). Therefore, we shift the focus from the predominating perspectives of society and business to consider NPOs as an active component of this relationship. Together, these findings offer a robust nonprofit-centric foundation that is necessary for NBC practice and theory development. JEL Classification: M1 Business Administration
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非营利企业合作:基于经验的价值创造框架
虽然在过去的几十年里,人们对非营利组织合作(NBC)的兴趣迅速增长,但与对企业视角及其对社会的影响的充分关注相比,文献对非营利组织(NPOs)的特殊性的曝光不足。具体来说,我们不清楚非营利组织如何在传统上专注于提供社会价值和意义之外,有意识地寻求与商业部门的合作,以促进其组织的生存能力和经济利益。鉴于政府资金和预算限制的不确定性日益增加,这种积极的做法已变得势在必行。然而,积极参与全国广播公司是复杂和有风险的。在这项研究中,我们通过调查几个活跃在全国广播公司的非营利组织来解决这一困境。基于分析和发现,我们开发了一个基于经验的框架,解释了非营利组织积极参与商业部门的本质。更具体地说,我们对各种内部和外部突发事件进行了细致的理论和实证调查,这些事件解释了非营利组织在与企业建立价值创造合作方面的有效性。此外,我们推进了当前关于需要明确区分社会价值创造(被认为是从合作中获得的仁慈利益的总和)和合作伙伴价值创造的辩论。因此,我们表明积极合作的npo区分了不同的NBC价值观,包括经济利益(为了生存),制度发展(为了组织效率),以及改变商业实践的转型(为了完成使命)。因此,我们将焦点从社会和商业的主导角度转移到将非营利组织视为这种关系的积极组成部分。总之,这些发现为全国广播公司的实践和理论发展提供了一个强有力的以非营利为中心的基础。JEL分类:M1企业管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The objectives of the Australian Journal of Management are to encourage and publish research in the field of management. The terms management and research are both broadly defined. The former includes the management of firms, groups, industries, regulatory bodies, government, and other institutions. The latter encompasses both discipline- and problem-based research. Consistent with the policy, the Australian Journal of Management publishes research in accounting, applied economics, finance, industrial relations, political science, psychology, statistics, and other disciplines, provided the application is to management, as well as research in areas such as marketing, corporate strategy, operations management, organisation development, decision analysis, and other problem-focuses paradigms.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of brief workplace compassion-focussed training in improving wellbeing of stressed school employees Not just a ‘nice to have’: Team compassionate care behaviours and patient safety Entrepreneurial functions performed by women entrepreneurs: Do incubators make a difference? The impact of board composition and internationalisation on strategic change: Longitudinal empirical evidence The Economic and Labour Relations Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1