{"title":"Educational technology for teaching economics–where to start and how to grow?","authors":"William L. Goffe","doi":"10.1080/00220485.2023.2274026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractNew economics instructors face numerous challenges when selecting technology for their courses. Because economists teach at a variety of institutions with diverse student bodies and since technology continues to evolve, this article focuses on general principles that novice instructors should consider when selecting technology for their courses. One principle is that technology should support “deliberate practice,” which encompasses many types of active learning. Instructors should be aware of the various constraints they face, including the numerous cognitive challenges to effective teaching, limitations to their own “working memory,” and potentially limited resources of their students and institutions. The “Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition” (SAMR) framework is introduced to explain how technology might influence instruction. Finally, instructors should learn how to optimally use the technology they select.Keywords: deliberate practicenovice instructortechnologyJEL codes: A2A22 AcknowledgmentsThe author thanks the symposium and the Journal editors for many helpful comments that greatly improved this article.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 The seminal paper is Ericsson, Krampe, and Tesch-Römer (Citation1993). Deliberate practice has been the foundation of several important papers in physics education research, including Deslauriers, Schelew, and Wieman (Citation2011), Jones, Madison, and Wieman (Citation2015), and McCarty and Deslauriers (Citation2020), while in economics there is Boyle and Goffe (Citation2018).2 Those wishing to improve their slides for maximum student understanding should follow Davis (Citation2021).3 Two descriptions of large language models are Newport (Citation2023) and Wolfram (Citation2023).","PeriodicalId":51564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Education","volume":"110 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2023.2274026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractNew economics instructors face numerous challenges when selecting technology for their courses. Because economists teach at a variety of institutions with diverse student bodies and since technology continues to evolve, this article focuses on general principles that novice instructors should consider when selecting technology for their courses. One principle is that technology should support “deliberate practice,” which encompasses many types of active learning. Instructors should be aware of the various constraints they face, including the numerous cognitive challenges to effective teaching, limitations to their own “working memory,” and potentially limited resources of their students and institutions. The “Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition” (SAMR) framework is introduced to explain how technology might influence instruction. Finally, instructors should learn how to optimally use the technology they select.Keywords: deliberate practicenovice instructortechnologyJEL codes: A2A22 AcknowledgmentsThe author thanks the symposium and the Journal editors for many helpful comments that greatly improved this article.Disclosure statementThe author reports there are no competing interests to declare.Notes1 The seminal paper is Ericsson, Krampe, and Tesch-Römer (Citation1993). Deliberate practice has been the foundation of several important papers in physics education research, including Deslauriers, Schelew, and Wieman (Citation2011), Jones, Madison, and Wieman (Citation2015), and McCarty and Deslauriers (Citation2020), while in economics there is Boyle and Goffe (Citation2018).2 Those wishing to improve their slides for maximum student understanding should follow Davis (Citation2021).3 Two descriptions of large language models are Newport (Citation2023) and Wolfram (Citation2023).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Education offers original articles on teaching economics. In its pages, leading scholars evaluate innovations in teaching techniques, materials, and programs. Instructors of introductory through graduate level economics will find the journal an indispensable resource for content and pedagogy in a variety of media. The Journal of Economic Education is published quarterly in cooperation with the National Council on Economic Education and the Advisory Committee on Economic Education of the American Economic Association.