Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making

Jakub HANDRLICA, Vladimír SHARP, Jan NEŠPOR
{"title":"Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making","authors":"Jakub HANDRLICA, Vladimír SHARP, Jan NEŠPOR","doi":"10.24818//tbj/2023/13/3.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gradual emergence of regulatory sandboxes in various jurisdictions has already triggered considerable attention of legal academia. Thus, academicians have addressed various legal frameworks, providing for regulatory sandboxes in the field of financial and energy technologies, artificial intelligence, medical products etc. In all these fields, regulatory sandboxes do currently serve as a tool for facilitating these new technologies, which could hardly emerge successfully under the rules of conventional legal frameworks. Beside identifying the advantages of regulatory sandboxes, various risks were also identified with respect to the prospective introduction of regulatory sandboxes in various fields of governance. This article aims to address the feature of ‘forum shopping’, that the spontaneous emergence of regulatory sandboxes might imply. The authors argue, that while such forum shopping will represent an inevitable implication of legal pluralism, one may also expect various attempts for the “passportisation” of regulatory sandboxes. At the same time, the authors aim to address a more theoretical question, to which extent are classical tenets of legal jurisprudence applicable to the experimental legislation?","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818//tbj/2023/13/3.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gradual emergence of regulatory sandboxes in various jurisdictions has already triggered considerable attention of legal academia. Thus, academicians have addressed various legal frameworks, providing for regulatory sandboxes in the field of financial and energy technologies, artificial intelligence, medical products etc. In all these fields, regulatory sandboxes do currently serve as a tool for facilitating these new technologies, which could hardly emerge successfully under the rules of conventional legal frameworks. Beside identifying the advantages of regulatory sandboxes, various risks were also identified with respect to the prospective introduction of regulatory sandboxes in various fields of governance. This article aims to address the feature of ‘forum shopping’, that the spontaneous emergence of regulatory sandboxes might imply. The authors argue, that while such forum shopping will represent an inevitable implication of legal pluralism, one may also expect various attempts for the “passportisation” of regulatory sandboxes. At the same time, the authors aim to address a more theoretical question, to which extent are classical tenets of legal jurisprudence applicable to the experimental legislation?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管沙箱中的论坛购物和实验性立法的危险
监管沙盒在各个司法管辖区的逐渐出现,已经引起了法学界的广泛关注。因此,院士们讨论了各种法律框架,规定了金融和能源技术、人工智能、医疗产品等领域的监管沙箱。在所有这些领域,监管沙箱目前确实是促进这些新技术的工具,这些新技术在传统法律框架的规则下很难成功出现。除了确定监管沙箱的优势外,还确定了在各个治理领域引入监管沙箱的各种风险。本文旨在解决“论坛购物”的特征,即监管沙盒的自发出现可能暗示的特征。作者认为,虽然这种论坛购物将不可避免地代表法律多元化的含义,但人们也可以预期,监管沙箱的“护照化”将会有各种尝试。同时,作者试图解决一个更具理论性的问题,即法理学的经典原则在多大程度上适用于实验立法?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1