A Completion Rate Conundrum: Reducing bias in the Single Usability Metric

Carl J. Pearson
{"title":"A Completion Rate Conundrum: Reducing bias in the Single Usability Metric","authors":"Carl J. Pearson","doi":"10.1177/21695067231194328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Single Usability Metric benchmarking method, the calculation of completion rates creates a bias for completion rates by ignoring the z-score transform that is conducted for satisfaction and time-on-task measures. This artificially inflates all ‘good’ scores and marks some ‘poor’ scores as ‘good’. This paper discusses two methods to augment the SUM so that it will accurately calculate completion rates into the final SUM score.","PeriodicalId":74544,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting","volume":"26 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231194328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Single Usability Metric benchmarking method, the calculation of completion rates creates a bias for completion rates by ignoring the z-score transform that is conducted for satisfaction and time-on-task measures. This artificially inflates all ‘good’ scores and marks some ‘poor’ scores as ‘good’. This paper discusses two methods to augment the SUM so that it will accurately calculate completion rates into the final SUM score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完成率难题:减少单一可用性度量的偏差
在单一可用性度量基准方法中,完成率的计算通过忽略满意度和任务完成时间度量的z-score转换而产生完成率偏差。这人为地夸大了所有的“好”分数,并将一些“差”分数标记为“好”分数。本文讨论了两种增加SUM的方法,使其能够准确地将完成率计算到最终的SUM分数中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Performance Feedback on Trust and Self-Confidence in Dynamically Reliable Automation. Polyp Detection in Colonoscopy Training: A Qualitative Analysis of Resident Challenges and Expert Strategies. Less can be More: Effects of a Forgetting Function on an AI-based Policy Capturing Tool Performance. Chatbot Memory: Uncovering How Mental Effort and Chabot Interactions Affect Short-Term Learning. Time-to-Collision Estimation With Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Visual and Auditory Cues: Which Cues are Most Important?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1