Analysis of Intervention Employability in Pharmacy-Related Medication Safety Reports at a Tertiary Medical Center

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1177/00185787231207995
Nick Crozier, Elisa Robinson, Nicole C. Murtagh, Briana D. Coyne
{"title":"Analysis of Intervention Employability in Pharmacy-Related Medication Safety Reports at a Tertiary Medical Center","authors":"Nick Crozier, Elisa Robinson, Nicole C. Murtagh, Briana D. Coyne","doi":"10.1177/00185787231207995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Institute for Safe Medication Practice (ISMP) suggests that patient safety reports be addressed with systematic, fail-safe, actions to prevent error recurrence. ISMP’s hierarchy of effectiveness of risk reduction strategies places education-related interventions as the least effective and fail-safes at the top. UNM Hospitals creates a positive environment for safety reporting, but often we are limited to education interventions due to resource and technology constraints. This study analyzes the intervention potential and quality of pharmacy-related medication safety reports. Methods: One thousand medication-related safety reports from selected time points between 2012 and 2022 were selected. Safety reports were included in our study if they were actionable by the pharmacy department. Each safety report was categorized by type of safety event and given an intervention potential score of 1 to 10 (1 indicating education-only, 10 being forcing function) by 2 student pharmacists and 1 pharmacy director based on their potential place on ISMP’s hierarchy. Safety report quality was graded based on professionalism, organization, clarity, and completeness. A standardized evaluation form was used for evaluation for all elements. Results: Six-hundred-sixty-five safety reports were pharmacy-related and evaluated by all 3 study team members for analysis. The 3 most common pharmacy-related safety reports were medication delivery, inappropriate order verification, and transcribing errors which accounted for over half of the reports (59.5%) and on average the intervention potential score of these types of safety reports was education only. Overall, safety reports were limited to a maximum actionability of education-only 75.4% of the time. Safety reports were found to be professionally written and well organized. Conclusion: The actionability of most pharmacy-related medication safety reports was limited to low leverage interventions likely because high leverage solutions were addressed with systematic change and did not recur. Errors limited to education interventions repeated and this increased relative counts of low leverage actionability of safety reports. The ISMP hierarchy of effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies is an important guide to intervening in medication-related safety events, but pharmacy staff should not be discouraged if most of the safety reports cannot be addressed through high-leverage interventions.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"34 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231207995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Institute for Safe Medication Practice (ISMP) suggests that patient safety reports be addressed with systematic, fail-safe, actions to prevent error recurrence. ISMP’s hierarchy of effectiveness of risk reduction strategies places education-related interventions as the least effective and fail-safes at the top. UNM Hospitals creates a positive environment for safety reporting, but often we are limited to education interventions due to resource and technology constraints. This study analyzes the intervention potential and quality of pharmacy-related medication safety reports. Methods: One thousand medication-related safety reports from selected time points between 2012 and 2022 were selected. Safety reports were included in our study if they were actionable by the pharmacy department. Each safety report was categorized by type of safety event and given an intervention potential score of 1 to 10 (1 indicating education-only, 10 being forcing function) by 2 student pharmacists and 1 pharmacy director based on their potential place on ISMP’s hierarchy. Safety report quality was graded based on professionalism, organization, clarity, and completeness. A standardized evaluation form was used for evaluation for all elements. Results: Six-hundred-sixty-five safety reports were pharmacy-related and evaluated by all 3 study team members for analysis. The 3 most common pharmacy-related safety reports were medication delivery, inappropriate order verification, and transcribing errors which accounted for over half of the reports (59.5%) and on average the intervention potential score of these types of safety reports was education only. Overall, safety reports were limited to a maximum actionability of education-only 75.4% of the time. Safety reports were found to be professionally written and well organized. Conclusion: The actionability of most pharmacy-related medication safety reports was limited to low leverage interventions likely because high leverage solutions were addressed with systematic change and did not recur. Errors limited to education interventions repeated and this increased relative counts of low leverage actionability of safety reports. The ISMP hierarchy of effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies is an important guide to intervening in medication-related safety events, but pharmacy staff should not be discouraged if most of the safety reports cannot be addressed through high-leverage interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某三级医疗中心药学相关用药安全报告干预就业能力分析
背景:安全用药实践研究所(ISMP)建议,患者安全报告应采用系统的、故障安全的措施来防止错误再次发生。ISMP降低风险战略的有效性等级将与教育有关的干预措施列为最不有效的措施,而将防故障措施列为最有效的措施。新墨西哥大学医院为安全报告创造了一个积极的环境,但由于资源和技术的限制,我们往往仅限于教育干预。本研究分析了药学相关用药安全报告的干预潜力和质量。方法:选取2012 - 2022年选定时间点的1000份药物相关安全报告。如果安全报告可由药学部门采取行动,则将其纳入我们的研究。每个安全报告按安全事件类型进行分类,并由2名学生药剂师和1名药房主任根据其在ISMP等级中的潜在位置给出1到10的干预潜力评分(1表示仅教育,10表示强制功能)。安全报告质量根据专业性、组织性、清晰度和完整性进行分级。采用标准化评价表对各要素进行评价。结果:665份安全报告与药物相关,并由所有3名研究小组成员评估进行分析。最常见的3种与药学相关的安全报告是给药、不适当的订单验证和抄写错误,占报告的一半以上(59.5%),这些类型的安全报告的平均干预潜力得分仅为教育。总的来说,安全报告仅限于教育的最大可操作性,只有75.4%的时间。安全报告写得很专业,组织也很好。结论:大多数与药学相关的用药安全报告的可操作性仅限于低杠杆干预措施,可能是因为高杠杆解决方案是通过系统改变来解决的,并且不会复发。错误仅限于重复的教育干预,这增加了安全报告的低杠杆可操作性的相对计数。ISMP降低风险策略的有效性等级是干预药物相关安全事件的重要指南,但如果大多数安全报告不能通过高杠杆干预措施得到解决,药房工作人员不应气馁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
期刊最新文献
Cefepime/Enmetazobactam. Impact of a Medication Reconciliation Improvement Package on Adherence to Medication Reconciliation Among Internal Medicine Physicians: A Quality Improvement Project in a Lower-Middle Income Country. Implementing Research Into Practice as a Clinical Based New Practitioner Pharmacist. Phytonadione Utilization and the Risk of Bleeding in Chronic Liver Disease. Safety and Efficacy of Switching Patients With Type 2 Diabetes From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists to Tirzepatide: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1