Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-04-27DOI: 10.1177/00185787241230079
Priscila Fiallo, Timothy Williams, Larry M Bush
Background: In 2002, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) project for the purposes of developing and standardizing quality improvement measures known to reduce the rates of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs). Four years later the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), an expansion of SIP, was published in governmental Specifications Manual for National Inpatient Quality Measures and provided several additional initiatives applicable to the perioperative period. Central to both projects are the assurance of the timeliness, selection, and duration of peri-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotics. In support of this objective, various medical associations, such as the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), have developed the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. To ensure compliance with quality measures, hospitals are required to report data to the Physicians Quality Reporting System, which is then reviewed by CMS for reimbursement purposes and to measure hospital performance. To maintain optimal standards of care and satisfy all core measures, it is expected that patients undergoing most categories of surgical procedures receive prophylactic antibiotics. We recognized that patients already being administered antimicrobial therapy as treatment for the condition requiring the surgery not uncommonly also were prescribed unwarranted and redundant pre-operative antibiotics. Our study was meant to quantify such antibiotic redundancy, which only risks the development of antimicrobial resistance and adverse events, to bolster our and other hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of computerized hospital records over a one-month period of time (November 2022) was conducted focusing on hospital admissions that involved surgical operative procedures. Only those patients who had received a pre-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotic were included in the analysis. Results: Of the 92 surgeries that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 38 (41.3%) were performed on patients who were already receiving therapeutic antibiotics for more than 24 hours targeted to treat the infection for which they were undergoing surgery. These included laparoscopic cholecystectomy (24), appendectomy (12), wound debridement (12), and soft tissue incision and drainage procedures (9), comprising nearly 50% of each type of these operations performed during the study time period. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a clear opportunity to strengthen both our, and presumably other, hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Together with physician education, granting the pharmacy the ability to cancel unnecessary and re
{"title":"When Antimicrobial Treatment and Surgical Prophylaxis Collide: A Stewardship Opportunity.","authors":"Priscila Fiallo, Timothy Williams, Larry M Bush","doi":"10.1177/00185787241230079","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00185787241230079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In 2002, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the <i>Surgical Infection Prevention</i> (SIP) project for the purposes of developing and standardizing quality improvement measures known to reduce the rates of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs). Four years later the <i>Surgical Care Improvement Project</i> (SCIP), an expansion of SIP, was published in governmental <i>Specifications Manual for National Inpatient Quality Measures and</i> provided several additional initiatives applicable to the perioperative period. Central to both projects are the assurance of the timeliness, selection, and duration of peri-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotics. In support of this objective, various medical associations, such as the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), have developed the <i>Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery</i>. To ensure compliance with quality measures, hospitals are required to report data to the <i>Physicians Quality Reporting System</i>, which is then reviewed by CMS for reimbursement purposes and to measure hospital performance. To maintain optimal standards of care and satisfy all core measures, it is expected that patients undergoing most categories of surgical procedures receive prophylactic antibiotics. We recognized that patients already being administered antimicrobial therapy as treatment for the condition requiring the surgery not uncommonly also were prescribed unwarranted and redundant pre-operative antibiotics. Our study was meant to quantify such antibiotic redundancy, which only risks the development of antimicrobial resistance and adverse events, to bolster our and other hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of computerized hospital records over a one-month period of time (November 2022) was conducted focusing on hospital admissions that involved surgical operative procedures. Only those patients who had received a pre-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotic were included in the analysis. <b>Results:</b> Of the 92 surgeries that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 38 (41.3%) were performed on patients who were already receiving therapeutic antibiotics for more than 24 hours targeted to treat the infection for which they were undergoing surgery. These included laparoscopic cholecystectomy (24), appendectomy (12), wound debridement (12), and soft tissue incision and drainage procedures (9), comprising nearly 50% of each type of these operations performed during the study time period. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings demonstrate a clear opportunity to strengthen both our, and presumably other, hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Together with physician education, granting the pharmacy the ability to cancel unnecessary and re","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195835/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141450380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-03-07DOI: 10.1177/00185787241237142
Kendall Stratton, Kelly W Davis
Purpose: Cefepime is an antibiotic associated with cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN), particularly in those with reduced renal function, or in cases of inappropriate medication dosing. This report describes a case of CIN associated with a change in infusion duration from 180 to30 minutes, which to the best of our knowledge has not been previously reported in the literature. Summary: A 73-year old male was treated with extended infusion cefepime over 180 minutes while hospitalized with recurrent pneumonia. On discharge, cefepime was continued as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) administered over 30 minutes. The patient began to experience symptoms of neurotoxicity after 1 day of receiving OPAT, which subsequently led to a readmission as neurological symptoms worsened. Cefepime was discontinued and symptoms resolved within 48 hours. Renal function was stable throughout treatment and no other causes for neurotoxicity were noted. Conclusion: This is a unique case of CIN secondary to shortened infusion time, which is clinically relevant, particularly during transitions of care. Further investigation, including more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring will be beneficial to further elucidate the relationship between infusion time and CIN development.
{"title":"Case Report: Cefepime Induced Neurotoxicity Following a Change in Infusion Time.","authors":"Kendall Stratton, Kelly W Davis","doi":"10.1177/00185787241237142","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00185787241237142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Cefepime is an antibiotic associated with cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN), particularly in those with reduced renal function, or in cases of inappropriate medication dosing. This report describes a case of CIN associated with a change in infusion duration from 180 to30 minutes, which to the best of our knowledge has not been previously reported in the literature. <b>Summary:</b> A 73-year old male was treated with extended infusion cefepime over 180 minutes while hospitalized with recurrent pneumonia. On discharge, cefepime was continued as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) administered over 30 minutes. The patient began to experience symptoms of neurotoxicity after 1 day of receiving OPAT, which subsequently led to a readmission as neurological symptoms worsened. Cefepime was discontinued and symptoms resolved within 48 hours. Renal function was stable throughout treatment and no other causes for neurotoxicity were noted. <b>Conclusion:</b> This is a unique case of CIN secondary to shortened infusion time, which is clinically relevant, particularly during transitions of care. Further investigation, including more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring will be beneficial to further elucidate the relationship between infusion time and CIN development.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141450379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-12-21DOI: 10.1177/00185787231218922
Sarah Arnold, Dustin Orvin, Malay Patel, Katie Schoen, Jamie Wagner, Bruce M Jones
Purpose: Vancomycin is recommended as first-line treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, dosed by area-under-the-curve (AUC) with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mcg/mL via broth microdilution. The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness of AUC-based and trough-based dosing in MRSA bacteremia with an MIC > 1 mcg/mL via Etest. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort that compared vancomycin dosed by AUC or trough between January 1, 2017 and September 1, 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of treatment failure defined as peristent bacteremia ≥ 7 days, inpatient mortality within 90 days, or microbiologic relapse or readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcomes compared nephrotoxicity, hospital and ICU length of stay, MIC differences, and difference in exposure measured by AUC. Results: Twenty-four patients in each group met inclusion criteria. For the primary outcome, there was no statistical difference in treatment failure between trough and AUC groups, respectively [10 (41.7%) vs 10 (41.7%), P = 1.000]. There was no statistical difference in secondary outcomes, with incidence of nephrotoxicity [3 (12.5%) trough vs 2 (8.33%) AUC, P = 1.000] and median AUC exposure over treatment course [502.9 mcg.h/mL (454.1-599.9) vs 474 mcg.h/mL (435.3-533), P = .312] similar between groups. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in treatment failure for vancomycin by AUC or trough with an Etest MIC > 1 mcg/mL. Overall exposure to vancomycin and incidence of nephrotoxicty were numerically higher in the trough group, suggesting that dosing by AUC may limit exposure without impact on treatment failure.
{"title":"Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia Treated With Vancomycin Calculated by Area-Under-the-Curve in Patients With Elevated Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations.","authors":"Sarah Arnold, Dustin Orvin, Malay Patel, Katie Schoen, Jamie Wagner, Bruce M Jones","doi":"10.1177/00185787231218922","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00185787231218922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Vancomycin is recommended as first-line treatment of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) bacteremia, dosed by area-under-the-curve (AUC) with an assumed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1 mcg/mL via broth microdilution. The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness of AUC-based and trough-based dosing in MRSA bacteremia with an MIC > 1 mcg/mL via Etest. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, observational cohort that compared vancomycin dosed by AUC or trough between January 1, 2017 and September 1, 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of treatment failure defined as peristent bacteremia ≥ 7 days, inpatient mortality within 90 days, or microbiologic relapse or readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcomes compared nephrotoxicity, hospital and ICU length of stay, MIC differences, and difference in exposure measured by AUC. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-four patients in each group met inclusion criteria. For the primary outcome, there was no statistical difference in treatment failure between trough and AUC groups, respectively [10 (41.7%) vs 10 (41.7%), <i>P</i> = 1.000]. There was no statistical difference in secondary outcomes, with incidence of nephrotoxicity [3 (12.5%) trough vs 2 (8.33%) AUC, <i>P</i> = 1.000] and median AUC exposure over treatment course [502.9 mcg.h/mL (454.1-599.9) vs 474 mcg.h/mL (435.3-533), <i>P</i> = .312] similar between groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> There was no statistically significant difference in treatment failure for vancomycin by AUC or trough with an Etest MIC > 1 mcg/mL. Overall exposure to vancomycin and incidence of nephrotoxicty were numerically higher in the trough group, suggesting that dosing by AUC may limit exposure without impact on treatment failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097929/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141064817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-23DOI: 10.1177/00185787241254994
Mei Tsai, Jason Suggett, Anthony Co, Tammy Ginder
The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented shortages of albuterol sulfate metered dose inhalers (MDIs) utilized in the supportive management of respiratory symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections. The risk of generating infective aerosols in nebulized treatments increased the demand for metered dose delivery, leading to a worldwide shortage of albuterol sulfate MDIs. Previous common canister protocols involve the recycling and cleaning of canisters for multiple patient use, however have not undergone quality control studies on viral cross-contamination. Torrance Memorial Medical Center utilized an off-label method of common canister administration through spacer devices, forgoing the need for sterilization while conserving albuterol sulfate during a public health emergency. A retrospective review of this emergency department protocol was conducted on 329 patients receiving this novel albuterol sulfate common canister method over a 10-month period between 3/23/2020 to 1/23/2021. Results showed 265 patients (80.5%) had improved aeration determined by breath sounds evaluation by the respiratory therapist and patient interview. Purchasing records reviewed since 3/1/2020 show purchases were sufficient to sustain albuterol sulfate MDI supply so that no treatments were delayed omitted during the 10-month evaluation period. This novel approach to common canister delivery offers a promising measure to conserve a vital inhaled medication during a public health emergency and could serve as a basis for future development of conservation and quality control studies.
{"title":"A Novel Common Canister Protocol for Albuterol Sulfate Metered Dose Inhalers: Conservation Strategy and Clinical Outcomes Amid COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Mei Tsai, Jason Suggett, Anthony Co, Tammy Ginder","doi":"10.1177/00185787241254994","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241254994","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented shortages of albuterol sulfate metered dose inhalers (MDIs) utilized in the supportive management of respiratory symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections. The risk of generating infective aerosols in nebulized treatments increased the demand for metered dose delivery, leading to a worldwide shortage of albuterol sulfate MDIs. Previous common canister protocols involve the recycling and cleaning of canisters for multiple patient use, however have not undergone quality control studies on viral cross-contamination. Torrance Memorial Medical Center utilized an off-label method of common canister administration through spacer devices, forgoing the need for sterilization while conserving albuterol sulfate during a public health emergency. A retrospective review of this emergency department protocol was conducted on 329 patients receiving this novel albuterol sulfate common canister method over a 10-month period between 3/23/2020 to 1/23/2021. Results showed 265 patients (80.5%) had improved aeration determined by breath sounds evaluation by the respiratory therapist and patient interview. Purchasing records reviewed since 3/1/2020 show purchases were sufficient to sustain albuterol sulfate MDI supply so that no treatments were delayed omitted during the 10-month evaluation period. This novel approach to common canister delivery offers a promising measure to conserve a vital inhaled medication during a public health emergency and could serve as a basis for future development of conservation and quality control studies.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141102917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-11DOI: 10.1177/00185787241252568
Emily M. Hitt, Danial E. Baker
Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.
{"title":"Capivasertib","authors":"Emily M. Hitt, Danial E. Baker","doi":"10.1177/00185787241252568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241252568","url":null,"abstract":"Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are available online to subscribers. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service, contact Wolters Kluwer customer service at 866-397-3433.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140988696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-23DOI: 10.1177/00185787231224065
Thungathurthi Smitha, Pantham Sunitha, O. Prabhakar, Sindgi Vasudeva Murthy
Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis is a burgeoning threat to public health requiring novel strategies to combat the infection. Although national tuberculosis elimination programs focus on improving health services, challenges in eradicating tuberculosis still exist. Factors attributing to unfavorable outcomes are unknown in Warangal district of Telangana state. Methods: This study included 296 patients diagnosed with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. The study participants followed up for a maximum of 20 months to determine treatment outcomes. Statistical applications of Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test used to find the survival probabilities in subgroups. Results: The survival of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients was ascertained, in male and female patients, aged between 31 and 50 years. Resistance to rifampicin was prominent. The study found a survival rate of 76.68% and a mortality rate of 23.31%. The log-rank test revealed a significant difference in survival in subcategories with and without comorbidities ( P = .03), non-adherence to treatment ( P = .0001), treatment duration ( P = .02), regimens ( P = .01), and grading of radiograph ( P = .0001). Conclusion: This study identified factors that influenced the survival probability of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients, including comorbidities, weight band, non-adherence to treatment, treatment duration, regimens, and grading of radiograph. These findings emphasize the need for enhanced management strategies to improve treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Survival Probability in Multidrug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in a South Indian Region","authors":"Thungathurthi Smitha, Pantham Sunitha, O. Prabhakar, Sindgi Vasudeva Murthy","doi":"10.1177/00185787231224065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231224065","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis is a burgeoning threat to public health requiring novel strategies to combat the infection. Although national tuberculosis elimination programs focus on improving health services, challenges in eradicating tuberculosis still exist. Factors attributing to unfavorable outcomes are unknown in Warangal district of Telangana state. Methods: This study included 296 patients diagnosed with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. The study participants followed up for a maximum of 20 months to determine treatment outcomes. Statistical applications of Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test used to find the survival probabilities in subgroups. Results: The survival of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients was ascertained, in male and female patients, aged between 31 and 50 years. Resistance to rifampicin was prominent. The study found a survival rate of 76.68% and a mortality rate of 23.31%. The log-rank test revealed a significant difference in survival in subcategories with and without comorbidities ( P = .03), non-adherence to treatment ( P = .0001), treatment duration ( P = .02), regimens ( P = .01), and grading of radiograph ( P = .0001). Conclusion: This study identified factors that influenced the survival probability of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients, including comorbidities, weight band, non-adherence to treatment, treatment duration, regimens, and grading of radiograph. These findings emphasize the need for enhanced management strategies to improve treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140671216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15DOI: 10.1177/00185787241247133
Susana Clemente Bautista, I. Jiménez Lozano, Laura Castellote Belles, C. Parramón-Teixidó, Carme Garcia Esquerda, A. Puertas Sanjuan, Carla Daina Noves, Vanessa Segura Encinas, Maria Josep Cabañas Poy
Objective:To evaluate the physical compatibility between intravenous magnesium sulfate and potassium and sodium phosphate, a common electrolyte intravenous supplementation in pediatric intensive care units. Study design: Magnesium sulfate was mixed separately with potassium phosphate and sodium phosphate at ratios of 1:1, 1:4, and 4:1. Binary mixtures were prepared, in triplicate and under sterile conditions, by permuting the order of addition. The undiluted pure drugs were used as controls for possible sequence effects. Visual changes, turbidity, and pH were assessed immediately after mixing (baseline) and at 4 and 24 hours. Two observers performed visual changes by naked-eye visual inspection in order to search visible haze, particulate matter, gas formation, or color change. Turbidity was measured by nephelometry and incompatibility was defined as an increase of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) from baseline. pH was measured using a portable pH meter and incompatibility was defined as a variation of >1 pH unit during the observation period. Results: None of the admixtures exhibited visual changes or significant variations in turbidity (increases of ≥0.5 in nephelometric turbidity units) or pH (changes of >1 unit) during the observation period and neither compared with baseline. Conclusion: In this study, no visual changes were observed, and turbidity and pH evaluated by instrumental methods remained within acceptable limits and showed no significant variations from baseline, therefore no physical incompatibility between magnesium sulfate and potassium or sodium phosphate was found.
{"title":"Physical Compatibility Between Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate and Potassium or Sodium Phosphate in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit","authors":"Susana Clemente Bautista, I. Jiménez Lozano, Laura Castellote Belles, C. Parramón-Teixidó, Carme Garcia Esquerda, A. Puertas Sanjuan, Carla Daina Noves, Vanessa Segura Encinas, Maria Josep Cabañas Poy","doi":"10.1177/00185787241247133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241247133","url":null,"abstract":"Objective:To evaluate the physical compatibility between intravenous magnesium sulfate and potassium and sodium phosphate, a common electrolyte intravenous supplementation in pediatric intensive care units. Study design: Magnesium sulfate was mixed separately with potassium phosphate and sodium phosphate at ratios of 1:1, 1:4, and 4:1. Binary mixtures were prepared, in triplicate and under sterile conditions, by permuting the order of addition. The undiluted pure drugs were used as controls for possible sequence effects. Visual changes, turbidity, and pH were assessed immediately after mixing (baseline) and at 4 and 24 hours. Two observers performed visual changes by naked-eye visual inspection in order to search visible haze, particulate matter, gas formation, or color change. Turbidity was measured by nephelometry and incompatibility was defined as an increase of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) from baseline. pH was measured using a portable pH meter and incompatibility was defined as a variation of >1 pH unit during the observation period. Results: None of the admixtures exhibited visual changes or significant variations in turbidity (increases of ≥0.5 in nephelometric turbidity units) or pH (changes of >1 unit) during the observation period and neither compared with baseline. Conclusion: In this study, no visual changes were observed, and turbidity and pH evaluated by instrumental methods remained within acceptable limits and showed no significant variations from baseline, therefore no physical incompatibility between magnesium sulfate and potassium or sodium phosphate was found.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140699566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15DOI: 10.1177/00185787241247135
Hope Rockett, S. Wilkinson, Sarah Daniel
Background: Access to essential medications remains a challenge, especially among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. In 2021, 18 million U.S. adults struggled to afford prescribed medications, a problem exacerbated by the prevalence of chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and mental health disorders. The 340B Drug Pricing Program has enabled eligible healthcare organizations to purchase drugs at reduced prices, thus enhancing medication accessibility for financially constrained patients. This study explores the impact of the Retail Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program within a 340B-eligible health system in addressing this issue. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a Retail Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program in increasing access to essential medications and reducing financial burden for eligible outpatients within a 340B-eligible health system. Methods: This exploratory study was conducted at a 340B-eligible academic medical center and focused on the implementation of the Retail Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program (RPPA Program). Eligible patients, already enrolled in the health system’s financial assistance program, were identified, and assessed for additional eligibility for the RPPA Program, ensuring prescriptions were written by internal providers and that patients did not have access to other financial assistance resources. Data collected included patient demographics, medication history, dispensed prescriptions, out-of-pocket patient savings, and pharmacist interventions. Results: During the study, 156 patients were enrolled. About half (51%; n = 79) did not utilize its services due to reasons such as the absence of active prescriptions, prescriptions from external providers, or existing coverage by the patients’ insurance. Of the 563 prescriptions clinically evaluated, 72% (n = 407) were dispensed free of charge to 77 patients, resulting in $13,945 in out-of-pocket patient savings. Of the total prescriptions assessed, 28% (n = 156) were not included on the RPPA Program formulary and were not changed to a RPPA formulary alternative for various reasons, such as a formulary alternative was not available, or the patient opted not to switch to formulary alternatives. Conclusions: The RPPA Program proved effective in reducing financial barriers to accessing essential outpatient medications. While it yielded positive outcomes, the program’s benefit was constrained to a limited patient demographic, underscoring the imperative to expand identification and engagement strategies to include a broader patient population.
{"title":"Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program: Evaluation of a Health System Retail Model for Outpatients","authors":"Hope Rockett, S. Wilkinson, Sarah Daniel","doi":"10.1177/00185787241247135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241247135","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Access to essential medications remains a challenge, especially among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. In 2021, 18 million U.S. adults struggled to afford prescribed medications, a problem exacerbated by the prevalence of chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and mental health disorders. The 340B Drug Pricing Program has enabled eligible healthcare organizations to purchase drugs at reduced prices, thus enhancing medication accessibility for financially constrained patients. This study explores the impact of the Retail Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program within a 340B-eligible health system in addressing this issue. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a Retail Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program in increasing access to essential medications and reducing financial burden for eligible outpatients within a 340B-eligible health system. Methods: This exploratory study was conducted at a 340B-eligible academic medical center and focused on the implementation of the Retail Pharmacy Prescription Assistance Program (RPPA Program). Eligible patients, already enrolled in the health system’s financial assistance program, were identified, and assessed for additional eligibility for the RPPA Program, ensuring prescriptions were written by internal providers and that patients did not have access to other financial assistance resources. Data collected included patient demographics, medication history, dispensed prescriptions, out-of-pocket patient savings, and pharmacist interventions. Results: During the study, 156 patients were enrolled. About half (51%; n = 79) did not utilize its services due to reasons such as the absence of active prescriptions, prescriptions from external providers, or existing coverage by the patients’ insurance. Of the 563 prescriptions clinically evaluated, 72% (n = 407) were dispensed free of charge to 77 patients, resulting in $13,945 in out-of-pocket patient savings. Of the total prescriptions assessed, 28% (n = 156) were not included on the RPPA Program formulary and were not changed to a RPPA formulary alternative for various reasons, such as a formulary alternative was not available, or the patient opted not to switch to formulary alternatives. Conclusions: The RPPA Program proved effective in reducing financial barriers to accessing essential outpatient medications. While it yielded positive outcomes, the program’s benefit was constrained to a limited patient demographic, underscoring the imperative to expand identification and engagement strategies to include a broader patient population.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140698980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15DOI: 10.1177/00185787241247716
Nicolette Centanni, Taylor Mezoian, John Gilboy, Jessica Evans, Nicole Hudak, Wendy Craig, Lesley Gordon
Introduction: Alcohol is the most common substance use disorder in the United States. Despite this prevalence, there remains significant heterogeneity in medical management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). While the 2020 American Society of Addition Medicine continues to recommend the use of benzodiazepines as first-line therapy for AWS, there is increasing use of phenobarbital in patients at high risk of severe AWS. Despite phenobarbital’s favorable pharmacologic profile, historically, clinical utilization on general medicine services has been low and often restricted. In this project, we have examined practice patterns and associated clinical outcomes in adult patients experiencing AWS on the general medicine service pre and post implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol for the treatment of severe AWS at our institution. Methods: This quality improvement study evaluated changes in management of AWS on general medicine units associated with implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol and order set in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our primary outcome measures were receipt of a phenobarbital loading dose, concomitant benzodiazepine administration, and total benzodiazepine dose. Safety outcomes were also explored to assess clinical impacts of this protocol implementation. The project was determined “not research” by our Institutional Review Board. Results: Phenobarbital-protocol implementation was associated with increased frequency of receiving a phenobarbital loading dose (49.5% vs 9.4%; P < .001), decreased use of concomitant benzodiazepine/phenobarbital (4.3% vs 28.9%; P < .001), and decreased total benzodiazepine dose (7.8 vs 15.5 mg; P < .001). Regarding safety, there was no significant pre/post difference in the rate of ICU transfer, but among those transferred there was a trend toward decreased mechanical ventilation rate (100% vs 28.6%; P = .051), and a significantly reduced ICU length of stay (median 11 vs 3 days; P = .04). There were no pre/post differences in seizures, delirium or use of adjunct medications. Conclusions: This quality improvement study demonstrates a marked change in provider prescribing practices for treating AWS after implementation of an institutional phenobarbital-based protocol. We observed no difference in overall clinical outcomes after protocol implementation, although a larger follow-up study is needed to confirm this and to further explore the shorter ICU length of stay for patients with AWS postimplementation.
导言:酒精是美国最常见的药物使用障碍。尽管如此,酒精戒断综合症(AWS)的医疗管理仍然存在很大的差异。虽然 2020 年美国成瘾医学会继续推荐使用苯二氮卓类药物作为戒酒综合症的一线治疗,但苯巴比妥在严重戒酒综合症高危患者中的使用也在不断增加。尽管苯巴比妥具有良好的药理作用,但从历史上看,其在全科医学服务中的临床使用率一直很低,而且经常受到限制。在本项目中,我们研究了在本机构实施基于苯巴比妥的重症 AWS 治疗方案前后,普通内科成人 AWS 患者的诊疗模式和相关临床结果。方法:这项质量改进研究评估了实施基于苯巴比妥的方案和电子病历(EMR)中的医嘱集后,普通内科病房对 AWS 的管理发生的变化。我们的主要结果指标是接受苯巴比妥负荷剂量、同时服用苯并二氮杂卓以及苯并二氮杂卓的总剂量。我们还探讨了安全性结果,以评估该方案实施的临床影响。该项目被我们的机构审查委员会认定为 "非研究 "项目。结果苯巴比妥方案的实施增加了接受苯巴比妥负荷剂量的频率(49.5% vs 9.4%; P < .001),减少了苯二氮杂卓/苯巴比妥的同时使用(4.3% vs 28.9%; P < .001),减少了苯二氮杂卓的总剂量(7.8 vs 15.5 mg; P < .001)。在安全性方面,ICU转院率前后无显著差异,但在转院患者中,机械通气率呈下降趋势(100% vs 28.6%;P = .051),ICU住院时间显著缩短(中位数11天 vs 3天;P = .04)。在癫痫发作、谵妄或辅助药物使用方面,前后没有差异。结论:这项质量改进研究表明,在实施基于苯巴比妥的机构方案后,医疗服务提供者治疗 AWS 的处方做法发生了显著变化。我们观察到协议实施后总体临床结果没有差异,但需要更大规模的随访研究来证实这一点,并进一步探讨协议实施后缩短 AWS 患者重症监护室住院时间的问题。
{"title":"Effect of Phenobarbital-Based Alcohol Withdrawal Protocol on Provider Practice and Patient Outcomes—A Quality Improvement Study","authors":"Nicolette Centanni, Taylor Mezoian, John Gilboy, Jessica Evans, Nicole Hudak, Wendy Craig, Lesley Gordon","doi":"10.1177/00185787241247716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241247716","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Alcohol is the most common substance use disorder in the United States. Despite this prevalence, there remains significant heterogeneity in medical management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). While the 2020 American Society of Addition Medicine continues to recommend the use of benzodiazepines as first-line therapy for AWS, there is increasing use of phenobarbital in patients at high risk of severe AWS. Despite phenobarbital’s favorable pharmacologic profile, historically, clinical utilization on general medicine services has been low and often restricted. In this project, we have examined practice patterns and associated clinical outcomes in adult patients experiencing AWS on the general medicine service pre and post implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol for the treatment of severe AWS at our institution. Methods: This quality improvement study evaluated changes in management of AWS on general medicine units associated with implementation of a phenobarbital-based protocol and order set in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our primary outcome measures were receipt of a phenobarbital loading dose, concomitant benzodiazepine administration, and total benzodiazepine dose. Safety outcomes were also explored to assess clinical impacts of this protocol implementation. The project was determined “not research” by our Institutional Review Board. Results: Phenobarbital-protocol implementation was associated with increased frequency of receiving a phenobarbital loading dose (49.5% vs 9.4%; P < .001), decreased use of concomitant benzodiazepine/phenobarbital (4.3% vs 28.9%; P < .001), and decreased total benzodiazepine dose (7.8 vs 15.5 mg; P < .001). Regarding safety, there was no significant pre/post difference in the rate of ICU transfer, but among those transferred there was a trend toward decreased mechanical ventilation rate (100% vs 28.6%; P = .051), and a significantly reduced ICU length of stay (median 11 vs 3 days; P = .04). There were no pre/post differences in seizures, delirium or use of adjunct medications. Conclusions: This quality improvement study demonstrates a marked change in provider prescribing practices for treating AWS after implementation of an institutional phenobarbital-based protocol. We observed no difference in overall clinical outcomes after protocol implementation, although a larger follow-up study is needed to confirm this and to further explore the shorter ICU length of stay for patients with AWS postimplementation.","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140701416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-08-30DOI: 10.1177/00185787231196772
Jimmy Gonzalez, Deepika Nayyar
Background: Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is a nonselective sodium-potassium exchange resin commonly used along with intravenous (IV) insulin, albuterol, furosemide, and/or calcium for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a newer non-absorbed exchange resin that preferentially increases fecal potassium excretion from the gastrointestinal tract. Limited data exists on the efficacy of SZC for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Objectives: To assess the achievement of normokalemia (serum potassium level [K+] 3.5-5.2 mmol/L) within 24 hours after administration of SZC or SPS in combination with insulin regular IV push. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective chart review (2020-2021) using electronic medical records at an academic health system. The study population included adult patients receiving one or more doses of SZC or SPS in combination with IV insulin for acute hyperkalemia (K+ >5.2 mmol/L). Patients receiving dialysis were excluded. Serum chemistries were assessed at baseline and an additional 2 values within 24 hours to determine normokalemia and hypokalemia at each follow-up. Results: Of 141 patients included, 51 received SZC and 90 received SPS. Normokalemia at the first follow-up was achieved in 51.0% of patients receiving SZC and 46.7% of patients receiving SPS (P = .622) and was sustained in 35.3%versus 44.4% (P = .289) of patients within 24 hours. Mean serum potassium differences from baseline to first follow-up were similar between SZC and SPS groups (0.9 mmol/L vs 1.0 mmol/L). Hypokalemia within 24 hours of administration occurred in 4 patients-1 in SZC, 3 in SPS. Conclusion: Both SZC and SPS yielded similar rates of normokalemia achievement with IV insulin for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate and Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate for Acute Hyperkalemia: A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Jimmy Gonzalez, Deepika Nayyar","doi":"10.1177/00185787231196772","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00185787231196772","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is a nonselective sodium-potassium exchange resin commonly used along with intravenous (IV) insulin, albuterol, furosemide, and/or calcium for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a newer non-absorbed exchange resin that preferentially increases fecal potassium excretion from the gastrointestinal tract. Limited data exists on the efficacy of SZC for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. <b>Objectives:</b> To assess the achievement of normokalemia (serum potassium level [K+] 3.5-5.2 mmol/L) within 24 hours after administration of SZC or SPS in combination with insulin regular IV push. <b>Methods:</b> A multicenter, retrospective chart review (2020-2021) using electronic medical records at an academic health system. The study population included adult patients receiving one or more doses of SZC or SPS in combination with IV insulin for acute hyperkalemia (K+ >5.2 mmol/L). Patients receiving dialysis were excluded. Serum chemistries were assessed at baseline and an additional 2 values within 24 hours to determine normokalemia and hypokalemia at each follow-up. <b>Results</b>: Of 141 patients included, 51 received SZC and 90 received SPS. Normokalemia at the first follow-up was achieved in 51.0% of patients receiving SZC and 46.7% of patients receiving SPS (<i>P</i> = .622) and was sustained in 35.3%versus 44.4% (<i>P</i> = .289) of patients within 24 hours. Mean serum potassium differences from baseline to first follow-up were similar between SZC and SPS groups (0.9 mmol/L vs 1.0 mmol/L). Hypokalemia within 24 hours of administration occurred in 4 patients-1 in SZC, 3 in SPS. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both SZC and SPS yielded similar rates of normokalemia achievement with IV insulin for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45618527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}