PERBANDINGAN FLAT SLAB DENGAN PELAT KONVENSIONAL TERHADAP PENGARUH BEBAN LATERAL

Q1 Multidisciplinary Citizen Science Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.53866/jimi.v3i2.241
Aldy Kurnia Saputra, Endah Kanti Pangestuti
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN FLAT SLAB DENGAN PELAT KONVENSIONAL TERHADAP PENGARUH BEBAN LATERAL","authors":"Aldy Kurnia Saputra, Endah Kanti Pangestuti","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i2.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction development in Indonesia continues to experience massive growth, especially in technology and innovation. In high-rise buildings, many structural developments have various forms of structural design. A new type of slab used in Indonesia has emerged in recent years: the flat slab. A flat slab is a reinforced concrete construction supported directly by columns without beams. By not using beams, it has the advantage of reducing floor height, faster implementation time, and more economical implementation costs. This research will redesign the structure of a 9-storey hospital building in Kudus with a flat slab structural system and then compare it with a conventional slab structural system using the ETABS and Spcoloumn programs. The earthquake load used refers to the PUSKIM website. This study compares both structural systems' structural period, inter-story deviation, and fundamental earthquake force. From the comparison between the flat slab structural system and the conventional plate, it was obtained that the value of the vibrating period of the flat slab structural system was 11.82% greater in the X direction and 12.82% in the Y direction than the conventional plate structural system. The inter-story deviation of the flat slab is 26.86% greater for the X direction and 28.87% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. The mass (weight) of the flat slab structural system is 8.37% greater than that of the conventional slab structural system. The primary earthquake force of the flat slab is 8.36% greater for the X direction and 8.4% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. So, it can be concluded that a flat slab is less efficient in resisting lateral loads than conventional slabs.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i2.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction development in Indonesia continues to experience massive growth, especially in technology and innovation. In high-rise buildings, many structural developments have various forms of structural design. A new type of slab used in Indonesia has emerged in recent years: the flat slab. A flat slab is a reinforced concrete construction supported directly by columns without beams. By not using beams, it has the advantage of reducing floor height, faster implementation time, and more economical implementation costs. This research will redesign the structure of a 9-storey hospital building in Kudus with a flat slab structural system and then compare it with a conventional slab structural system using the ETABS and Spcoloumn programs. The earthquake load used refers to the PUSKIM website. This study compares both structural systems' structural period, inter-story deviation, and fundamental earthquake force. From the comparison between the flat slab structural system and the conventional plate, it was obtained that the value of the vibrating period of the flat slab structural system was 11.82% greater in the X direction and 12.82% in the Y direction than the conventional plate structural system. The inter-story deviation of the flat slab is 26.86% greater for the X direction and 28.87% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. The mass (weight) of the flat slab structural system is 8.37% greater than that of the conventional slab structural system. The primary earthquake force of the flat slab is 8.36% greater for the X direction and 8.4% for the Y direction than the conventional slab structural system. So, it can be concluded that a flat slab is less efficient in resisting lateral loads than conventional slabs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平板与传统板对横向负载影响的比较
印度尼西亚的建筑发展继续经历巨大的增长,特别是在技术和创新方面。在高层建筑中,许多结构开发都有各种形式的结构设计。近年来,印度尼西亚出现了一种新型的平板:平板。平板是一种钢筋混凝土结构,没有梁,直接由柱支撑。由于不使用梁,它具有降低楼层高度,更快的实施时间和更经济的实施成本的优点。本研究将使用平板结构系统重新设计Kudus一座9层医院建筑的结构,然后使用ETABS和spcolumns程序将其与传统的平板结构系统进行比较。使用的地震荷载参考PUSKIM网站。本研究比较了两种结构体系的结构周期、层间偏差和基本地震力。通过对平板结构体系与传统板结构体系的比较,得出平板结构体系在X方向上的振动周期值比传统板结构体系大11.82%,在Y方向上的振动周期值比传统板结构体系大12.82%。与常规板结构体系相比,X方向楼板层间偏差增大26.86%,Y方向楼板层间偏差增大28.87%。平板结构体系的质量(重量)比传统的平板结构体系大8.37%。与常规平板结构体系相比,该结构体系在X方向上的主地震力增大8.36%,在Y方向上的主地震力增大8.4%。因此,可以得出结论,平板在抵抗侧向荷载方面的效率低于常规板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Citizen Science Theory and Practice Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Snap Decisions: Assessing Participation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Program Using Repeat Photography Diversifying Large-Scale Participatory Science: The Efficacy of Engagement through Facilitator Organizations “Every Small Action Helps Towards the Greater Cause:” Online Communities Scaling Up Online Community-Led Citizen Science in Addressing Litter Challenges in Scotland Cross-Project Analysis of Volunteers’ Scientific Observation Skills Citizen Scientist Participation in Research on Private Lands Positively Impacts Multiple Conservation Behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1