Atorvastatin

IF 0.5 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Practical Diabetes Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1002/pdi.2450
Calum Richardson, Gerry McKay, Andrea Llano
{"title":"Atorvastatin","authors":"Calum Richardson, Gerry McKay, Andrea Llano","doi":"10.1002/pdi.2450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High cholesterol, in particular increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL), is a significant, modifiable risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In people with diabetes, the risk of CVD is greatly increased and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. People with diabetes typically have a triad of elevated fasting and postprandial triglycerides, elevated LDL cholesterol and a relative reduction in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. While exercise, diet and tighter glycaemic control can contribute to improvements in the lipid profile, statins offer the biggest risk reduction with respect to CVD; every 1mmol/L reduction in LDL-C with statin therapy is associated with a 22% reduction in cardiovascular events.1 Statins may also have additional cardiovascular protective effects via their action on platelets, endothelium and atherosclerotic plaques. Statins therefore have an important role in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD. The pharmacology of atorvastatin is shown in Figure 1. HMG-CoA reductase catalyses the reduction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A to mevalonate, the rate limiting step of the hepatic pathway of cholesterol synthesis. Shorter-acting statins such as simvastatin should be taken at night as most cholesterol synthesis takes place when dietary intake is lowest. Atorvastatin has a longer half-life and can be taken at any time. Atorvastatin has oral bioavailability of 14% after first pass metabolism and is highly plasma protein bound. It is metabolised by the CYP450 system (CYP3A4) and eliminated in bile. CYP3A4 inhibitors such as clarithromycin, ciclosporin and ketoconazole can significantly increase plasma concentrations of atorvastatin and co-administration should be avoided or the dose of atorvastatin reduced. Atorvastatin has been studied in people with and without diabetes. It is well tolerated, efficacious and has minimal adverse events. A Cochrane review of 296 trials in 38,817 participants found that treatment with 10–80mg of atorvastatin was associated with a reduction in LDL-C of 37.1–51.7%.2 The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial – Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) examined the effect on atorvastatin on the primary prevention of CVD. In all, 10,305 patients with hypertension and at least three cardiovascular risk factors were randomised to 10mg atorvastatin or placebo. The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD). The trial was terminated early because of the reduction in coronary events and stroke. Treatment with atorvastatin was associated with a relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint of 36% compared with placebo (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.5–0.83, p=000.5) and a 27% risk reduction in stroke (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–00.96, p=0.0236).3 The efficacy of atorvastatin in the secondary prevention of CVD was demonstrated in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. In this large-scale randomised trial, over 1000 patients with established CHD were randomised to 10mg or 80mg atorvastatin for a median of 4.9 years. Treatment with high dose atorvastatin was associated with a 22% relative reduction in risk of major cardiovascular events. This trial was also significant because it was the first to demonstrate the beneficial effects of achieving a target LDL-C of 2.0mmol/L and below in patients with CHD.4 Atorvastatin is largely well tolerated. The most common reason for discontinuation is due to statin-associated muscle symptoms such as myalgia, reported to occur in 10–15% of trial participants. Despite this, less than 0.1% of patients treated with atorvastatin experience true myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Asymptomatic mild rises in liver transaminases occur in up to 2% of patients. Statins are associated with increased insulin resistance and new onset diabetes. In patients treated with atorvastatin, this risk appears dose related and is increased in the presence of risk factors such as obesity, hypertension and impaired fasting glucose. In patients with diabetes, statin use has also been associated with diabetes progression, increased risk of hyperglycaemia and initiation of insulin.5 Atorvastatin has proven efficacy in the primary and secondary prevention in patients with diabetes. Participants in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) had type 2 diabetes and at least one cardiovascular risk factor but no history of CVD. Treatment with 10mg atorvastatin was associated with a 37% reduction in cardiovascular events compared to placebo regardless of baseline LDL-C level.6 The study was terminated early as a consequence of the benefits seen. In contrast, the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN) failed to show any effect on the primary endpoint (composite of time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardiac arrest and hospitalisation for unstable angina) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with atorvastatin despite significant reductions in LDL-C.7 It is likely that issues with the study design, change in protocol, different endpoints and use of lipid-lowering therapy in both groups influenced the results. The ASCOT-LLA trial included 2532 patients with type 2 diabetes randomised to treatment with 10mg atorvastatin or placebo. The subgroup analysis did not show a statistically significant reduction in the primary endpoint of fatal CHD and non-fatal MI in patients with diabetes treated with atorvastatin which may have related to the limited power to detect a significant difference.3 A subsequent analysis of this group demonstrated that atorvastatin significantly reduced the risk of all cardiovascular events and procedures by 23% (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.01–0.98, p=0.036).8 The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) study investigated the use of 80mg atorvastatin in patients with recent stroke or TIA but no CHD. A subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes in this trial found a reduction in major cardiovascular events, coronary events and revascularisation procedures.9 Atorvastatin is an effective and safe treatment for lipid-lowering therapy and prevention of cardiovascular adverse events in patients with and without diabetes. Current guidelines recommend use of 20mg or 80mg atorvastatin for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD respectively. While the increased incidence of new onset diabetes or worsening glycaemic control is an important consideration, the risk of not using lipid-lowering therapy in people who are at significant cardiovascular risk is arguably more important. There are no conflicts of interest declared.","PeriodicalId":20309,"journal":{"name":"Practical Diabetes","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High cholesterol, in particular increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL), is a significant, modifiable risk factor in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In people with diabetes, the risk of CVD is greatly increased and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. People with diabetes typically have a triad of elevated fasting and postprandial triglycerides, elevated LDL cholesterol and a relative reduction in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. While exercise, diet and tighter glycaemic control can contribute to improvements in the lipid profile, statins offer the biggest risk reduction with respect to CVD; every 1mmol/L reduction in LDL-C with statin therapy is associated with a 22% reduction in cardiovascular events.1 Statins may also have additional cardiovascular protective effects via their action on platelets, endothelium and atherosclerotic plaques. Statins therefore have an important role in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD. The pharmacology of atorvastatin is shown in Figure 1. HMG-CoA reductase catalyses the reduction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A to mevalonate, the rate limiting step of the hepatic pathway of cholesterol synthesis. Shorter-acting statins such as simvastatin should be taken at night as most cholesterol synthesis takes place when dietary intake is lowest. Atorvastatin has a longer half-life and can be taken at any time. Atorvastatin has oral bioavailability of 14% after first pass metabolism and is highly plasma protein bound. It is metabolised by the CYP450 system (CYP3A4) and eliminated in bile. CYP3A4 inhibitors such as clarithromycin, ciclosporin and ketoconazole can significantly increase plasma concentrations of atorvastatin and co-administration should be avoided or the dose of atorvastatin reduced. Atorvastatin has been studied in people with and without diabetes. It is well tolerated, efficacious and has minimal adverse events. A Cochrane review of 296 trials in 38,817 participants found that treatment with 10–80mg of atorvastatin was associated with a reduction in LDL-C of 37.1–51.7%.2 The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial – Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) examined the effect on atorvastatin on the primary prevention of CVD. In all, 10,305 patients with hypertension and at least three cardiovascular risk factors were randomised to 10mg atorvastatin or placebo. The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD). The trial was terminated early because of the reduction in coronary events and stroke. Treatment with atorvastatin was associated with a relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint of 36% compared with placebo (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.5–0.83, p=000.5) and a 27% risk reduction in stroke (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–00.96, p=0.0236).3 The efficacy of atorvastatin in the secondary prevention of CVD was demonstrated in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. In this large-scale randomised trial, over 1000 patients with established CHD were randomised to 10mg or 80mg atorvastatin for a median of 4.9 years. Treatment with high dose atorvastatin was associated with a 22% relative reduction in risk of major cardiovascular events. This trial was also significant because it was the first to demonstrate the beneficial effects of achieving a target LDL-C of 2.0mmol/L and below in patients with CHD.4 Atorvastatin is largely well tolerated. The most common reason for discontinuation is due to statin-associated muscle symptoms such as myalgia, reported to occur in 10–15% of trial participants. Despite this, less than 0.1% of patients treated with atorvastatin experience true myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Asymptomatic mild rises in liver transaminases occur in up to 2% of patients. Statins are associated with increased insulin resistance and new onset diabetes. In patients treated with atorvastatin, this risk appears dose related and is increased in the presence of risk factors such as obesity, hypertension and impaired fasting glucose. In patients with diabetes, statin use has also been associated with diabetes progression, increased risk of hyperglycaemia and initiation of insulin.5 Atorvastatin has proven efficacy in the primary and secondary prevention in patients with diabetes. Participants in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) had type 2 diabetes and at least one cardiovascular risk factor but no history of CVD. Treatment with 10mg atorvastatin was associated with a 37% reduction in cardiovascular events compared to placebo regardless of baseline LDL-C level.6 The study was terminated early as a consequence of the benefits seen. In contrast, the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ASPEN) failed to show any effect on the primary endpoint (composite of time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardiac arrest and hospitalisation for unstable angina) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with atorvastatin despite significant reductions in LDL-C.7 It is likely that issues with the study design, change in protocol, different endpoints and use of lipid-lowering therapy in both groups influenced the results. The ASCOT-LLA trial included 2532 patients with type 2 diabetes randomised to treatment with 10mg atorvastatin or placebo. The subgroup analysis did not show a statistically significant reduction in the primary endpoint of fatal CHD and non-fatal MI in patients with diabetes treated with atorvastatin which may have related to the limited power to detect a significant difference.3 A subsequent analysis of this group demonstrated that atorvastatin significantly reduced the risk of all cardiovascular events and procedures by 23% (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.01–0.98, p=0.036).8 The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) study investigated the use of 80mg atorvastatin in patients with recent stroke or TIA but no CHD. A subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes in this trial found a reduction in major cardiovascular events, coronary events and revascularisation procedures.9 Atorvastatin is an effective and safe treatment for lipid-lowering therapy and prevention of cardiovascular adverse events in patients with and without diabetes. Current guidelines recommend use of 20mg or 80mg atorvastatin for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD respectively. While the increased incidence of new onset diabetes or worsening glycaemic control is an important consideration, the risk of not using lipid-lowering therapy in people who are at significant cardiovascular risk is arguably more important. There are no conflicts of interest declared.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿托伐他汀
相比之下,阿托伐他汀预防非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病冠心病终点研究(ASPEN)未能显示阿托伐他汀治疗2型糖尿病患者的主要终点(心血管死亡时间、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中、冠状动脉搭桥手术、心脏骤停和不稳定心绞痛住院)有任何影响,尽管ldl - c显著降低7可能是研究设计、方案改变、不同的终点和两组使用降脂治疗的问题影响了结果。ASCOT-LLA试验包括2532例2型糖尿病患者,随机接受10mg阿托伐他汀或安慰剂治疗。亚组分析未显示阿托伐他汀治疗的糖尿病患者致死性冠心病和非致死性心肌梗死的主要终点在统计学上有显著降低,这可能与检测显着差异的有限能力有关对该组的后续分析表明,阿托伐他汀显著降低了23%的所有心血管事件和手术的风险(HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.01-0.98, p=0.036)通过积极降低胆固醇水平预防卒中(SPARCL)研究调查了近期卒中或TIA但无冠心病患者使用80mg阿托伐他汀的情况。该试验对2型糖尿病患者进行亚组分析,发现主要心血管事件、冠状动脉事件和血运重建手术减少阿托伐他汀是一种有效和安全的治疗降脂治疗和预防心血管不良事件的患者有和没有糖尿病。目前的指南建议使用20mg或80mg阿托伐他汀分别用于心血管疾病的一级和二级预防。虽然新发糖尿病发病率的增加或血糖控制的恶化是一个重要的考虑因素,但对于有显著心血管风险的患者,不使用降脂治疗的风险可以说是更重要的。没有宣布任何利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Diabetes
Practical Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Practical Diabetes concerns itself with all aspects of the worldwide clinical science and practice of diabetes medicine. The journal recognises the importance of each member of the healthcare team in the delivery of diabetes care, and reflects this diversity of professional interest in its editorial contents. The Editors welcome original papers, case reports, practice points, audit articles and letters on any aspect of clinical diabetes care from any part of the world. The journal also publishes commissioned leaders, review articles and educational and training series, for which an honorarium normally is paid. All articles submitted to Practical Diabetes are independently peer reviewed. They must not have been published or be under submission currently elsewhere. Enquiries from prospective authors are welcomed and the Editors will be pleased, if asked, to advise on preparation and submission of articles. All articles and enquiries should be directed to the Editors at the publishing address below. The journal is published nine times a year, and currently the average waiting time for acceptance of articles is eight weeks, and for subsequent publication sixteen weeks. Practical Diabetes is independent of any commercial or vested interest.
期刊最新文献
Variation in the reporting of glucose values during simultaneous glucose sensor wear Using stories to explore the lived experience of alcohol consumption in people with diabetes mellitus Improving safety at scale via concise, impactful diabetes training for all health and social care staff Reflections on the Diabetes Self‐Management Alliance Workshop: providing better emotional support in diabetes routine care Extreme hypernatraemia and rhabdomyolysis in a child with hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state mixed with diabetic ketoacidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1