Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttad077
David Morrison
{"title":"Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the <i>Income Tax Assessment Act (1936)</i> Cth","authors":"David Morrison","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The reason taxpayers make arrangements is because they are able to suit themselves, as well as their and business and investment purposes. Such arrangements are as many and varied as there are taxpayers. It is impossible for a legislator, especially in relation to taxation, which by its very nature is a by-product of being free to so arrange, to set out, or prescribe in detail what is and what is not acceptable, except in the clearest of cases. The use of trusts causes the Commissioner of Taxation some concern and the ATO arguably starts with the position that those using trusts are doing so to lessen their taxation burden. Trusts, however, are used for a variety of personal and commercial purposes. It is the case that taxation considerations are increasingly considered to be a part of the equation. The difficulties around the application of section 100A are causing no little consternation for taxpayers and their advisors, not in the least because the Australian Revenue authorities have taken considerable time to issue their view, while at the same time pursuing taxpayers for alleged breaches of the provision.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The reason taxpayers make arrangements is because they are able to suit themselves, as well as their and business and investment purposes. Such arrangements are as many and varied as there are taxpayers. It is impossible for a legislator, especially in relation to taxation, which by its very nature is a by-product of being free to so arrange, to set out, or prescribe in detail what is and what is not acceptable, except in the clearest of cases. The use of trusts causes the Commissioner of Taxation some concern and the ATO arguably starts with the position that those using trusts are doing so to lessen their taxation burden. Trusts, however, are used for a variety of personal and commercial purposes. It is the case that taxation considerations are increasingly considered to be a part of the equation. The difficulties around the application of section 100A are causing no little consternation for taxpayers and their advisors, not in the least because the Australian Revenue authorities have taken considerable time to issue their view, while at the same time pursuing taxpayers for alleged breaches of the provision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚对信托的税收安排:所得税评估法(1936)第100A条
纳税人进行纳税安排,一方面是为了符合自身的需要,另一方面是为了符合自身的经营和投资目的。有多少纳税人,这种安排就有多少,种类就有多少。一个立法者,特别是在税收方面,是不可能的,因为税收本质上是自由安排的副产品,规定或详细规定什么是可接受的,什么是不可接受的,除非是在最清楚的情况下。信托的使用引起了税务专员的一些关注,ATO可以说是从使用信托的人这样做是为了减轻他们的税收负担的立场开始的。然而,信托被用于各种个人和商业目的。事实上,税收方面的考虑越来越被认为是平衡的一部分。100A条款适用的困难给纳税人和他们的顾问造成了不小的恐慌,尤其是因为澳大利亚税务当局花了相当长的时间来发表他们的观点,同时追查纳税人涉嫌违反该条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1