Drug Utilization Evaluation of Systemic Antifungals in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sherin Mathew, Cristy Anne Kuriakose, Sandra Shaji, Binu Upendran, Lakshmi R
{"title":"Drug Utilization Evaluation of Systemic Antifungals in a Tertiary Care Hospital","authors":"Sherin Mathew, Cristy Anne Kuriakose, Sandra Shaji, Binu Upendran, Lakshmi R","doi":"10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The incidence of Invasive Fungal Infection has increased, and it constitutes a serious threat to human health and life, especially in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of antifungal agents along with their risk factors and sensitivity pattern. Methods: It is a retrospective, cross-sectional study, which includes details of patients prescribed with systemic antifungal agents during a period of five years (01-06-2016 to 31-05-2021). Collected details were compared with Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines and mycological results to determine the overall appropriateness. Results: A total of 102 patients prescribed with systemic antifungals were selected for the study. The majority of the drugs were prescribed as Definitive (59.19%) and T Fluconazole (39.4%) was the most common drug given. The most common indication for antifungal prescriptions was found to be Respiratory tract infection. Appropriateness of antifungal use was assessed on indication, dosage, contraindication, and drug-drug interaction. Overall assessment of antifungal agents and treatment strategy demonstrated that antifungal treatment was appropriate in 41.6% cases, debatable in 36% cases and inappropriate in 22.4% of cases. The most common culture specimen collected was urine and Candida tropicalis (42.86%) was the frequently separated organism from it. Sepsis (21.4%) was the most common risk factor associated with invasive fungal infection. Conclusion: By implementing an effective antifungal stewardship program, we could improve the rational use of systemic antifungals and thereby prevent the future resistance and improve clinical outcome.","PeriodicalId":21367,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i09.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of Invasive Fungal Infection has increased, and it constitutes a serious threat to human health and life, especially in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of antifungal agents along with their risk factors and sensitivity pattern. Methods: It is a retrospective, cross-sectional study, which includes details of patients prescribed with systemic antifungal agents during a period of five years (01-06-2016 to 31-05-2021). Collected details were compared with Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines and mycological results to determine the overall appropriateness. Results: A total of 102 patients prescribed with systemic antifungals were selected for the study. The majority of the drugs were prescribed as Definitive (59.19%) and T Fluconazole (39.4%) was the most common drug given. The most common indication for antifungal prescriptions was found to be Respiratory tract infection. Appropriateness of antifungal use was assessed on indication, dosage, contraindication, and drug-drug interaction. Overall assessment of antifungal agents and treatment strategy demonstrated that antifungal treatment was appropriate in 41.6% cases, debatable in 36% cases and inappropriate in 22.4% of cases. The most common culture specimen collected was urine and Candida tropicalis (42.86%) was the frequently separated organism from it. Sepsis (21.4%) was the most common risk factor associated with invasive fungal infection. Conclusion: By implementing an effective antifungal stewardship program, we could improve the rational use of systemic antifungals and thereby prevent the future resistance and improve clinical outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某三级医院全身性抗真菌药物利用评价
摘要侵袭性真菌感染的发病率不断上升,严重威胁着人类的健康和生命,特别是在免疫功能低下和危重患者中。我们的目的是评估抗真菌药物的适宜性及其危险因素和敏感性模式。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,包括5年(01-06-2016至31-05-2021)期间使用全身抗真菌药物的患者的详细信息。收集的细节与美国传染病学会(IDSA)指南和真菌学结果进行比较,以确定总体适宜性。结果:共有102例患者接受了全身性抗真菌药物治疗。最常用的药物是氟康唑(39.4%),最常用的药物是决定性药物(59.19%)。抗真菌处方最常见的适应症是呼吸道感染。评估抗真菌药物使用的适应症、剂量、禁忌症和药物-药物相互作用。对抗真菌药物和治疗策略的总体评估表明,41.6%的病例抗真菌治疗合适,36%的病例不合适,22.4%的病例不合适。尿液中最常见的培养标本为热带念珠菌(42.86%)。脓毒症(21.4%)是侵袭性真菌感染最常见的危险因素。结论:通过实施有效的抗真菌药物管理方案,可以提高全身性抗真菌药物的合理使用,从而预防未来的耐药,改善临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examination of Risk Factors and Postpartum Cardiomyopathy in Hospital Outcomes in a Tertiary Level Hospital in Bangladesh An Analysis of Hospitalized Burn Injuries in a Burn Care Unit of Northern Bangladesh Transmission of Hepatitis B in Newborn Mothers with Positive Hbs in the Csref of Commune V of the District of Bamako Phytochemical Profiling and Investigating of Anti-Diabetic Properties of Asparagopsis taxiformis Collected from the Bay of Bengal Bangladesh Gallbladder Diverticula in Chronic Calculous Cholecystitis 15-Year-Old Boy: Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1