Prevalence of Pathological Lesion Due to Mild Head Trauma in Computed Tomography Scan of Patients’ Brains

Seyed Mehdi Pourafzali, Aida Amiripour, Mohammad Ali Dayani, Afsaneh Malekpour, Parna Alikhani, Abdolrahim Sanei
{"title":"Prevalence of Pathological Lesion Due to Mild Head Trauma in Computed Tomography Scan of Patients’ Brains","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Pourafzali, Aida Amiripour, Mohammad Ali Dayani, Afsaneh Malekpour, Parna Alikhani, Abdolrahim Sanei","doi":"10.34172/ehsj.2023.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: This study investigated the prevalence of pathological lesions on the computed tomography (CT) scans of the brains of patients with mild head trauma based on the New Orleans-Canadian criteria at Shahrekord Ayatollah Kashani Hospital, Iran. Methods: All patients referred to the Emergency Department of Shahrekord Ayatollah Kashani Hospital in 2019 with a history of head trauma were included in this cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study according to the criteria of mild head trauma. Then, the relevant checklist was used to record the patients’ level of consciousness, demographic information, and cause of trauma. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS 18, and the patient’s lesions were reported accordingly. Results: Out of 143 patients, 89 were males, and 54 were females in this study. Falling from a height was the cause of head trauma in most patients (43.3%). Among all patients, the CT scans of six patients were abnormal and had lesions. The vomiting had a significant relationship with the results of the CT scan, and for patients with mild head trauma, the Canadian and New Orleans indices had the same clinical importance. Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the New Orleans index could identify more patients as CT scan candidates than the Canadian index; however, there was no difference in the final result (the presence of a pathological lesion in the CT scan) between these two indices. The New Orleans index has more features than the Canadian index, but its results are not different from the Canadian index. Thus, we believe that using the Canadian index can reduce imaging rates, costs, and protection from the side effects of radiation.","PeriodicalId":470613,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health System Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health System Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ehsj.2023.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study investigated the prevalence of pathological lesions on the computed tomography (CT) scans of the brains of patients with mild head trauma based on the New Orleans-Canadian criteria at Shahrekord Ayatollah Kashani Hospital, Iran. Methods: All patients referred to the Emergency Department of Shahrekord Ayatollah Kashani Hospital in 2019 with a history of head trauma were included in this cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study according to the criteria of mild head trauma. Then, the relevant checklist was used to record the patients’ level of consciousness, demographic information, and cause of trauma. Finally, the data were analyzed using SPSS 18, and the patient’s lesions were reported accordingly. Results: Out of 143 patients, 89 were males, and 54 were females in this study. Falling from a height was the cause of head trauma in most patients (43.3%). Among all patients, the CT scans of six patients were abnormal and had lesions. The vomiting had a significant relationship with the results of the CT scan, and for patients with mild head trauma, the Canadian and New Orleans indices had the same clinical importance. Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the New Orleans index could identify more patients as CT scan candidates than the Canadian index; however, there was no difference in the final result (the presence of a pathological lesion in the CT scan) between these two indices. The New Orleans index has more features than the Canadian index, but its results are not different from the Canadian index. Thus, we believe that using the Canadian index can reduce imaging rates, costs, and protection from the side effects of radiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅脑ct扫描中轻度颅脑损伤病理损害的发生率
背景和目的:本研究调查了伊朗Shahrekord阿亚图拉卡沙尼医院(Shahrekord Ayatollah Kashani Hospital)轻度颅脑损伤患者的脑部CT扫描病理病变的患病率,CT扫描基于新奥尔良-加拿大标准。方法:根据轻度头部创伤的标准,将2019年所有转诊至Shahrekord阿亚图拉卡沙尼医院急诊科的有头部创伤史的患者纳入这项横断面描述性分析研究。然后,使用相关的检查表记录患者的意识水平、人口统计信息和创伤原因。最后,使用SPSS 18对数据进行分析,并对患者的病变进行相应的报告。结果:143例患者中,男性89例,女性54例。从高处坠落是大多数患者头部外伤的原因(43.3%)。在所有患者中,有6例患者CT扫描异常并有病变。呕吐与CT扫描结果有显著关系,对于轻度头部创伤患者,加拿大和新奥尔良指数具有相同的临床重要性。结论:根据本研究结果,新奥尔良指数比加拿大指数能识别出更多的CT候选患者;然而,这两个指标在最终结果(CT扫描中是否存在病理病变)上没有差异。新奥尔良指数比加拿大指数具有更多的特征,但其结果与加拿大指数并没有什么不同。因此,我们认为使用加拿大指数可以降低成像率、成本和对辐射副作用的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between COVID-19 Anxiety, Psychological Distress, and Decision-making Styles in Nurses of a Selected Hospital in Yazd Province, Iran Trend in SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Seroprevalence in Bukavu Between 2020 and 2023: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Study The Association Between the Perception of Aging and Hope in Older People of Gorgan, Iran Assessment of Conventional and Molecular Methods in the Routine Management of Tuberculosis in a High Tuberculosis Burden Setting COVID-19: Current Status and Necessary Measures for Prevention of Future Outbreaks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1