Classification of chronic pain using fMRI data: Unveiling brain activity patterns for diagnosis

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-07 DOI:10.55730/1300-0632.4034
REJULA V, ANITHA J, BELFIN ROBINSON
{"title":"Classification of chronic pain using fMRI data: Unveiling brain activity patterns for diagnosis","authors":"REJULA V, ANITHA J, BELFIN ROBINSON","doi":"10.55730/1300-0632.4034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Millions of people throughout the world suffer from the complicated and crippling condition of chronic pain. It can be brought on by several underlying disorders or injuries and is defined by chronic pain that lasts for a period exceeding three months. To better understand the brain processes behind pain and create prediction models for pain-related outcomes, machine learning is a potent technology that may be applied in Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) chronic pain research. Data (fMRI and T1-weighted images) from 76 participants has been included (30 chronic pain and 46 healthy controls). The raw data were preprocessed using fMRIprep and then parcellated using five various atlases such as MSDL, Yeo?17, Harvard, Schaefer, and Pauli. Then the functional connectivity between the parcellated Region of Interests (ROIs) has been taken as features for the machine learning classifier models using the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signals. To distinguish between those with chronic pain and healthy controls, this study used Support Vector Machines (SVM), Boosting, Bagging, convolutional neural network (CNN), XGboost, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SDG) classifiers. The classification models use stratified shuffle split sampling to fragment the training and testing dataset during various iterations. Hyperparameter tuning was used to get the best classifier model across several combinations of parameters. The best parameters for the classifier were measured by the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model. Finally, to identify the top ROIs involved in chronic pain was unveiled by the probability-based feature importance method. The result shows that Pauli (subcortical atlas) and MSDL (cortical atlas) worked well for this chronic pain fMRI data. Boosting algorithm classified chronic pain and healthy controls with 94.35% accuracy on the data parcellated with the Pauli atlas. The top four regions contributing to this classifier model were the extended Amygdala, the Subthalamic nucleus, the Hypothalamus, and the Caudate Nucleus. Also, the fMRI data parcellated using a cortical MSDL atlas was classified using the XGboost model with an accuracy of 87.5%. Left Frontal Pole, Medial Default mode Network, right pars opercularis, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), and Front Default mode network are the top five regions that contributed to classify the participants. These findings demonstrate that patterns of brain activity in areas associated with pain processing can be used to categorize individuals as chronic pain patients or healthy controls reliably. These discoveries may help with the identification and management of chronic pain and may pave the way for the creation of more potent tailored medicines for those who suffer from it.","PeriodicalId":49410,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0632.4034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Millions of people throughout the world suffer from the complicated and crippling condition of chronic pain. It can be brought on by several underlying disorders or injuries and is defined by chronic pain that lasts for a period exceeding three months. To better understand the brain processes behind pain and create prediction models for pain-related outcomes, machine learning is a potent technology that may be applied in Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) chronic pain research. Data (fMRI and T1-weighted images) from 76 participants has been included (30 chronic pain and 46 healthy controls). The raw data were preprocessed using fMRIprep and then parcellated using five various atlases such as MSDL, Yeo?17, Harvard, Schaefer, and Pauli. Then the functional connectivity between the parcellated Region of Interests (ROIs) has been taken as features for the machine learning classifier models using the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signals. To distinguish between those with chronic pain and healthy controls, this study used Support Vector Machines (SVM), Boosting, Bagging, convolutional neural network (CNN), XGboost, and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SDG) classifiers. The classification models use stratified shuffle split sampling to fragment the training and testing dataset during various iterations. Hyperparameter tuning was used to get the best classifier model across several combinations of parameters. The best parameters for the classifier were measured by the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model. Finally, to identify the top ROIs involved in chronic pain was unveiled by the probability-based feature importance method. The result shows that Pauli (subcortical atlas) and MSDL (cortical atlas) worked well for this chronic pain fMRI data. Boosting algorithm classified chronic pain and healthy controls with 94.35% accuracy on the data parcellated with the Pauli atlas. The top four regions contributing to this classifier model were the extended Amygdala, the Subthalamic nucleus, the Hypothalamus, and the Caudate Nucleus. Also, the fMRI data parcellated using a cortical MSDL atlas was classified using the XGboost model with an accuracy of 87.5%. Left Frontal Pole, Medial Default mode Network, right pars opercularis, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), and Front Default mode network are the top five regions that contributed to classify the participants. These findings demonstrate that patterns of brain activity in areas associated with pain processing can be used to categorize individuals as chronic pain patients or healthy controls reliably. These discoveries may help with the identification and management of chronic pain and may pave the way for the creation of more potent tailored medicines for those who suffer from it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用功能磁共振成像数据分类慢性疼痛:揭示脑活动模式诊断
全世界有数百万人患有慢性疼痛这种复杂的致残病症。它可以由几种潜在的疾病或损伤引起,并被定义为持续超过三个月的慢性疼痛。为了更好地理解疼痛背后的大脑过程,并为疼痛相关结果创建预测模型,机器学习是一项强有力的技术,可以应用于功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)慢性疼痛研究。数据(功能磁共振成像和t1加权图像)来自76名参与者(30名慢性疼痛和46名健康对照)。原始数据使用fmri预处理,然后使用五种不同的地图集(如MSDL, Yeo?哈佛,谢弗和泡利。然后,使用血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号将分割的兴趣区域(roi)之间的功能连通性作为机器学习分类器模型的特征。为了区分慢性疼痛患者和健康对照组,本研究使用了支持向量机(SVM)、Boosting、Bagging、卷积神经网络(CNN)、XGboost和随机梯度下降(SDG)分类器。该分类模型在不同的迭代过程中使用分层洗牌分割采样来分割训练和测试数据集。采用超参数调优方法在多个参数组合中获得最佳分类器模型。通过模型的准确性、灵敏度和特异性来衡量分类器的最佳参数。最后,采用基于概率的特征重要度方法对慢性疼痛的roi进行识别。结果表明Pauli(皮质下图谱)和MSDL(皮质图谱)对慢性疼痛的fMRI数据有很好的效果。boost算法在Pauli图谱分割的数据上对慢性疼痛和健康对照进行分类,准确率为94.35%。这一分类器模型中最重要的四个区域是扩展的杏仁核、丘脑下核、下丘脑和尾状核。此外,使用皮质MSDL图谱进行分割的fMRI数据使用XGboost模型进行分类,准确率为87.5%。左侧额极、内侧默认网络、右侧包膜部、前扣带背皮层和前默认网络是对被试分类贡献最大的5个区域。这些发现表明,与疼痛处理相关区域的大脑活动模式可以可靠地用于将个体分类为慢性疼痛患者或健康对照者。这些发现可能有助于识别和管理慢性疼痛,并可能为那些患有慢性疼痛的人创造更有效的量身定制药物铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6.9 months
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences is published electronically 6 times a year by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) Accepts English-language manuscripts in the areas of power and energy, environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, electronics, industry applications, control systems, information and systems, applied electromagnetics, communications, signal and image processing, tomographic image reconstruction, face recognition, biometrics, speech processing, video processing and analysis, object recognition, classification, feature extraction, parallel and distributed computing, cognitive systems, interaction, robotics, digital libraries and content, personalized healthcare, ICT for mobility, sensors, and artificial intelligence. Contribution is open to researchers of all nationalities.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of YOLO models and a transformer-based YOLOv5 model for mass detection in mammograms Feature selection optimization with filtering and wrapper methods: two disease classification cases New modified carrier-based level-shifted PWM control for NPC rectifiers considered for implementation in EV fast chargers FuzzyCSampling: A Hybrid fuzzy c-means clustering sampling strategy for imbalanced datasets A practical low-dimensional feature vector generation method based on wavelet transform for psychophysiological signals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1