Consumers' sensory perception and technological properties of whole foods utilization in bakery products: a case of study of banana peel

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY British Food Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1108/bfj-04-2023-0341
Gabriel Maschio, Liana Stoll, Rosiele Lappe Padilha, Kelly de Moraes, Fernanda Leal Leães, Roberta Cruz Silveira Thys, Voltaire Sant'Anna
{"title":"Consumers' sensory perception and technological properties of whole foods utilization in bakery products: a case of study of banana peel","authors":"Gabriel Maschio, Liana Stoll, Rosiele Lappe Padilha, Kelly de Moraes, Fernanda Leal Leães, Roberta Cruz Silveira Thys, Voltaire Sant'Anna","doi":"10.1108/bfj-04-2023-0341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The objective was to evaluate the effect of banana peel into cake (a bakery product that may add bananas) and panettone (a product that never is added to bananas) formulations on consumers' acceptance and perceived attributes and the effect on the technological properties of the product. Design/methodology/approach Bakery products were produced with banana peel in the formulation and control samples without residue. Volunteers scored their acceptance and checked all attributes applied to the four samples in the blind and informed tests. The texture, color, proximate composition and bake properties were measured. Findings The acceptance of both cakes, with and without banana peel, was not affected when consumers were informed that there was a residue in both cakes. Relative risk indicated that information had no influence on acceptance. Panettone with banana pulp showed a reduction in acceptance when volunteers were informed of the presence of banana peel. Risk analysis showed a significant relative risk of product rejection when consumers were aware of information. The addition of banana peel enhanced panettone chewiness and crumb hardness, reduced bake loss of cakes, reduced the volume of both products and changed some color parameters of both products. Originality/value Banana peel is a source of functional compounds, but it is not clear how consumers react when informed that the food presents it.","PeriodicalId":9231,"journal":{"name":"British Food Journal","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Food Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-04-2023-0341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The objective was to evaluate the effect of banana peel into cake (a bakery product that may add bananas) and panettone (a product that never is added to bananas) formulations on consumers' acceptance and perceived attributes and the effect on the technological properties of the product. Design/methodology/approach Bakery products were produced with banana peel in the formulation and control samples without residue. Volunteers scored their acceptance and checked all attributes applied to the four samples in the blind and informed tests. The texture, color, proximate composition and bake properties were measured. Findings The acceptance of both cakes, with and without banana peel, was not affected when consumers were informed that there was a residue in both cakes. Relative risk indicated that information had no influence on acceptance. Panettone with banana pulp showed a reduction in acceptance when volunteers were informed of the presence of banana peel. Risk analysis showed a significant relative risk of product rejection when consumers were aware of information. The addition of banana peel enhanced panettone chewiness and crumb hardness, reduced bake loss of cakes, reduced the volume of both products and changed some color parameters of both products. Originality/value Banana peel is a source of functional compounds, but it is not clear how consumers react when informed that the food presents it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对烘焙食品中天然食品利用的感官知觉及工艺特性——以香蕉皮为例
目的:评估香蕉皮在蛋糕(一种可能添加香蕉的烘焙产品)和panettone(一种从未添加到香蕉中的产品)配方中对消费者接受度和感知属性的影响以及对产品技术特性的影响。设计/方法/方法烘焙产品在配方中加入香蕉皮,对照样品无残留。志愿者对他们的接受度进行评分,并检查在盲测和知情测试中应用于四个样本的所有属性。测定了其质地、颜色、近似成分和烘烤性能。当消费者被告知两种蛋糕中都有香蕉皮残留时,他们对这两种蛋糕的接受度,不管有没有香蕉皮,都没有受到影响。相对风险表明信息对接受没有影响。当志愿者被告知香蕉皮的存在时,含有香蕉果肉的Panettone的接受度降低。风险分析表明,当消费者了解信息时,产品被拒绝的相对风险显著。香蕉皮的加入增强了panettone的嚼劲和面包屑硬度,降低了蛋糕的烘烤损失,减小了两种产品的体积,并改变了两种产品的一些颜色参数。香蕉皮是一种功能性化合物的来源,但当消费者得知食物中含有这种化合物时,他们的反应尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Food Journal
British Food Journal 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
15.20%
发文量
219
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: After 115 years, the British Food Journal (BFJ) continues to be highly respected worldwide for its broad and unique interdisciplinary coverage of the latest food-related double blind peer-reviewed research. It links all sectors of this dynamic industry, keeping abreast of emerging trends, topical and controversial issues and informing and stimulating debate. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=bfj#sthash.O3wH4pEh.dpuf
期刊最新文献
Product-based marketing strategies: pork consumption in Taiwan and Japan A multi-level tool to support the circular economy decision-making process in agri-food entrepreneurship The perceived authenticity in food among sociological generations: the case of cheeses in Mexico Ambidextrous cultural values in the management of organisational ambidexterity Exploring the determinants of purchase intention of organic consumers for organic food items: an exploratory study in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1