Responsibility for the Effects of our Actions in a Global Society: A Thomistic Approach

Q3 Arts and Humanities Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0549
Jordan McFadden
{"title":"Responsibility for the Effects of our Actions in a Global Society: A Thomistic Approach","authors":"Jordan McFadden","doi":"10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As contemporary ethical discourse has highlighted, due to the world’s increasing connectedness, everyday actions can contribute to harmful consequences far removed from everyday experience. I argue that Aquinas’s treatment of consequences can give us insight into our responsibility for such effects of our actions on a global scale. In particular, Aquinas recognises that we are responsible for per accidens effects of good actions performed negligently. Even an unintended per accidens effect may follow with a degree of likelihood that makes it foreseeable, even if not actually foreseen; thus the agent is responsible if he fails to take steps to prevent the negative per accidens effect from occurring. I argue that certain global effects of our actions fit this pattern, namely, they are per accidens effects that nonetheless follow from our actions with a high degree of likelihood. Thus, we have a responsibility to take steps to prevent them.","PeriodicalId":36725,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2023_79_1_0549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As contemporary ethical discourse has highlighted, due to the world’s increasing connectedness, everyday actions can contribute to harmful consequences far removed from everyday experience. I argue that Aquinas’s treatment of consequences can give us insight into our responsibility for such effects of our actions on a global scale. In particular, Aquinas recognises that we are responsible for per accidens effects of good actions performed negligently. Even an unintended per accidens effect may follow with a degree of likelihood that makes it foreseeable, even if not actually foreseen; thus the agent is responsible if he fails to take steps to prevent the negative per accidens effect from occurring. I argue that certain global effects of our actions fit this pattern, namely, they are per accidens effects that nonetheless follow from our actions with a high degree of likelihood. Thus, we have a responsibility to take steps to prevent them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全球社会中对我们行为的影响负责:托马斯主义的方法
正如当代伦理话语所强调的那样,由于世界的联系日益紧密,日常行为可能导致与日常经验相距甚远的有害后果。我认为,阿奎那对后果的处理可以让我们洞察到我们对全球范围内我们行为的影响所承担的责任。特别是,阿奎那认识到我们要对过失行为所造成的意外后果负责。即使是意外事故的影响,也可能以某种程度的可能性随之而来,使其成为可预见的,即使实际上无法预见;因此,如果行为人未能采取措施防止负面事故效应的发生,他就要承担责任。我认为,我们行为的某些全球性影响符合这种模式,也就是说,它们是偶然的影响,尽管如此,我们的行为很可能会产生这种影响。因此,我们有责任采取措施加以防止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Time for Truth: Tarski Between Heidegger and Rorty The Crowning of Anarchy, Remarks on the Age of Pure Difference Hospitalidade e conflito: o problema do “reconhecimento” no acolhimento de refugiados A “Modest” Primitivist Theory of Truth: The Ineffability of Truth, Effability of the Correspondence Relation A Holistic Double-Reference Explanatory Basis for a Unifying Pluralist Account of Truth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1