Teacher appraisal system and professional learning. Insights from Italian school principals’ and teachers’ views on multiple sources of data and indicators

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Professional Development in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1080/19415257.2023.2266912
Loredana Perla, Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci, Patrizia Soleti
{"title":"Teacher appraisal system and professional learning. Insights from Italian school principals’ and teachers’ views on multiple sources of data and indicators","authors":"Loredana Perla, Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci, Patrizia Soleti","doi":"10.1080/19415257.2023.2266912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper explores school principals’ and teachers’ views of the Italian teachers’ appraisal system and related indicators. In particular, the research aimed at examining the opinions of school principals and teachers regarding the domains to be considered for teacher appraisal purposes. An investigation involving 37 school principals and 868 in service teachers, from three Italian regions, is presented. The data was collected through a questionnaire and statistically analysed. Findings suggest operationalising new data sources – specifically students and parent, - is beneficial to evaluate teacher quality as a construct in data-based professional learning communities. They show different positioning: teachers seem to be really inclined to be evaluated, especially by students and parents, while school principals still seem very cautious in entrusting the teachers’ appraisal to an external point of view. This paper adds to the existing research showing the perspective of a new teachers’ appraisal, inspired by multi-faceted models based on multiple points of view (students, parents, not only principals) and not reduced to simplistic solutions of an accounting type. Furthermore, the study answers the call for research into teachers’ appraisal as part of the professional learning actions and in view of more integrated professional leadership.KEYWORDS: Professional learningteacher’ appraisalindicators Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The number of textual occurrences is higher than the number of textual strings because some very long responses were coded with more than one label/category.","PeriodicalId":47497,"journal":{"name":"Professional Development in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Development in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2266912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper explores school principals’ and teachers’ views of the Italian teachers’ appraisal system and related indicators. In particular, the research aimed at examining the opinions of school principals and teachers regarding the domains to be considered for teacher appraisal purposes. An investigation involving 37 school principals and 868 in service teachers, from three Italian regions, is presented. The data was collected through a questionnaire and statistically analysed. Findings suggest operationalising new data sources – specifically students and parent, - is beneficial to evaluate teacher quality as a construct in data-based professional learning communities. They show different positioning: teachers seem to be really inclined to be evaluated, especially by students and parents, while school principals still seem very cautious in entrusting the teachers’ appraisal to an external point of view. This paper adds to the existing research showing the perspective of a new teachers’ appraisal, inspired by multi-faceted models based on multiple points of view (students, parents, not only principals) and not reduced to simplistic solutions of an accounting type. Furthermore, the study answers the call for research into teachers’ appraisal as part of the professional learning actions and in view of more integrated professional leadership.KEYWORDS: Professional learningteacher’ appraisalindicators Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The number of textual occurrences is higher than the number of textual strings because some very long responses were coded with more than one label/category.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师评价制度与专业学习。意大利学校校长和教师对多种数据和指标来源的见解
摘要本文探讨了校长和教师对意大利教师评价体系及相关指标的看法。特别是,该研究旨在调查学校校长和教师对教师评价应考虑的领域的意见。本文对意大利三个地区的37名校长和868名服务教师进行了调查。通过问卷调查收集数据并进行统计分析。研究结果表明,在以数据为基础的专业学习社区中,利用新的数据源(特别是学生和家长)有利于评估教师质量。他们表现出不同的定位:教师似乎真的倾向于被评价,尤其是学生和家长的评价,而学校校长似乎仍然非常谨慎地将教师的评价委托给外部观点。本文在现有研究的基础上增加了新的教师评价视角,该视角受到基于多角度(学生、家长,而不仅仅是校长)的多面模型的启发,而不是简化为会计类型的简单解决方案。此外,本研究回应了将教师评价作为专业学习行动的一部分进行研究的呼吁,并考虑到更综合的专业领导。关键词:专业学习教师评价指标披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。文本出现的次数高于文本字符串的数量,因为一些非常长的响应使用多个标签/类别进行编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Development in Education
Professional Development in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Reviewing the past and considering the present to inform the future of professional learning Beyond tick boxes: re-imagining education for sustainable development in higher education No time to ‘put that in’: can we silence the ticking clock that controls teachers’ professional learning? Priorities and possibilities for teacher professional learning in a (post)COVID-19 era Facilitating professional development in teacher learning groups: development and validation of the ‘value creation questionnaire’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1