Information and propaganda strategies in German non-state media discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1 Q2 AREA STUDIES Baltic Region Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-2
Julia V. Balakina
{"title":"Information and propaganda strategies in German non-state media discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Julia V. Balakina","doi":"10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyse the strategies supporting the German Government’s biopolitical health and life protection practices and how they were promoted in the discourse of non-state media outlets during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is assumed that non-state media used various pandemic communication strategies to achieve common biopolitical goals, striking a balance between propaganda and outreach. A comparative analysis was conducted of German publications that focused on the pandemic and appeared during the four waves (January 2020 —March 2022). A total of 54,515 texts from the German media (Süddeutsche Zeitung, Die Zeit, Die Tageszeitung) were examined. Methodologically, the study draws on the Herman-Chomsky propaganda model and Jacques Ellul’s concept. The results show that non-state media employ different communication strategies in line with the filters of the Herman-Chomsky model. All the media outlets maintained a balance between propaganda and public outreach, supporting the Government’s biopolitical programme whilst prioritising their own interests. It can be concluded that the strategies chosen by the non-state media outlets instilled a sense of confidence, prompting the public to comply with the restrictions and measures consistent with the biopolitical agenda of the state.","PeriodicalId":43257,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Region","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the strategies supporting the German Government’s biopolitical health and life protection practices and how they were promoted in the discourse of non-state media outlets during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is assumed that non-state media used various pandemic communication strategies to achieve common biopolitical goals, striking a balance between propaganda and outreach. A comparative analysis was conducted of German publications that focused on the pandemic and appeared during the four waves (January 2020 —March 2022). A total of 54,515 texts from the German media (Süddeutsche Zeitung, Die Zeit, Die Tageszeitung) were examined. Methodologically, the study draws on the Herman-Chomsky propaganda model and Jacques Ellul’s concept. The results show that non-state media employ different communication strategies in line with the filters of the Herman-Chomsky model. All the media outlets maintained a balance between propaganda and public outreach, supporting the Government’s biopolitical programme whilst prioritising their own interests. It can be concluded that the strategies chosen by the non-state media outlets instilled a sense of confidence, prompting the public to comply with the restrictions and measures consistent with the biopolitical agenda of the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间德国非国有媒体话语中的信息和宣传策略
本研究旨在分析支持德国政府生物政治健康和生命保护实践的战略,以及在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,这些战略如何在非国有媒体的话语中得到推广。据推测,非国家媒体使用各种流行病传播策略来实现共同的生物政治目标,在宣传和外联之间取得平衡。对四波(2020年1月至2022年3月)期间出现的以大流行为重点的德国出版物进行了比较分析。共审查了来自德国媒体(《德意志日报》、《时代报》、《时代报》)的54,515篇文章。在方法上,本研究借鉴了赫尔曼-乔姆斯基的宣传模型和雅克·埃卢的概念。结果表明,非国有媒体采用了符合赫尔曼-乔姆斯基模型过滤器的不同传播策略。所有媒体都在宣传和公众接触之间保持平衡,支持政府的生物政治方案,同时优先考虑自己的利益。可以得出结论,非国有媒体选择的策略灌输了一种自信感,促使公众遵守符合国家生物政治议程的限制和措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Baltic Region
Baltic Region AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relating Sustainable Development Goals in a Conceptual Integrated Model of Growth and Welfare COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortality Factors Spatial Economics and Totalitarian Temptations Credit market development and agricultural production in selected African countries Financial Development and Human Development in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1