Are Betting Markets Inefficient? Evidence From Simulations and Real Data

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Sports Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1177/15270025231204997
David Winkelmann, Marius Ötting, Christian Deutscher, Tomasz Makarewicz
{"title":"Are Betting Markets Inefficient? Evidence From Simulations and Real Data","authors":"David Winkelmann, Marius Ötting, Christian Deutscher, Tomasz Makarewicz","doi":"10.1177/15270025231204997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous literature leaves the impression that betting market inefficiencies are widespread. However, most studies rely upon limited data and ignore biases’ persistence. Our simulation-based analyses show (1) the impact of low sample sizes on the chance to detect markets that only appear to be efficient and (2) the frequency of observing inefficient periods within fully efficient markets. Afterwards, we (3) empirically analyze real-world football betting markets for 14 consecutive seasons. While inefficiencies occur in singular seasons, they are not persistent or systematic across leagues. Moreover, our simulation-based analyses suggest that statistically significant effects in single seasons are likely to be observed even under full market efficiency.","PeriodicalId":51522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Economics","volume":"57 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025231204997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous literature leaves the impression that betting market inefficiencies are widespread. However, most studies rely upon limited data and ignore biases’ persistence. Our simulation-based analyses show (1) the impact of low sample sizes on the chance to detect markets that only appear to be efficient and (2) the frequency of observing inefficient periods within fully efficient markets. Afterwards, we (3) empirically analyze real-world football betting markets for 14 consecutive seasons. While inefficiencies occur in singular seasons, they are not persistent or systematic across leagues. Moreover, our simulation-based analyses suggest that statistically significant effects in single seasons are likely to be observed even under full market efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博彩市场效率低下吗?来自模拟和真实数据的证据
先前的文献给人的印象是,博彩市场的低效率是普遍存在的。然而,大多数研究依赖于有限的数据,忽视了偏见的持久性。我们基于模拟的分析表明:(1)低样本量对发现看似有效的市场的机会的影响;(2)在完全有效的市场中观察到无效率时期的频率。随后,我们(3)对连续14个赛季的现实足球博彩市场进行了实证分析。虽然效率低下发生在单个赛季,但它们不会持续或系统地贯穿整个联赛。此外,我们基于模拟的分析表明,即使在完全市场效率的情况下,单季节的统计显著效应也可能被观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Sports Economics publishes scholarly research in the field of sports economics. The aim of the journal is to further research in the area of sports economics by bringing together theoretical and empirical research in a single intellectual venue. Relevant topics include: labor market research; labor-management relations; collective bargaining; wage determination; local public finance; and other fields related to the economics of sports. Published quarterly, the Journal of Sports Economics is unique in that it is the only journal devoted specifically to this rapidly growing field.
期刊最新文献
Updating Beliefs Based on Observed Performance: Evidence From NFL Head Coaches Should I Stay or Should I Go Pro? Early NFL Draft Entry by NCAA FBS Underclassmen Umpire Home Bias in Major League Baseball International Competitions, Star Players, and NWSL Attendance James Patrick Quirk: An Academic Obituary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1