Exploring consumers’ social media engagement in addressing plastic pollution

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT Social Responsibility Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1108/srj-12-2022-0530
Shavneet Sharma, Gurmeet Singh
{"title":"Exploring consumers’ social media engagement in addressing plastic pollution","authors":"Shavneet Sharma, Gurmeet Singh","doi":"10.1108/srj-12-2022-0530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Plastic pollution is a major issue that plagues modern society. Scholars are interested in comprehending consumers’ behavioural actions to address plastic pollution. This study aims to delve into the determinants of consumers’ engagement with social media as a medium to address plastic pollution. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model is developed that extends the behavioural reasoning theory (BRT). Using a quantitative approach, 476 responses underwent structural equation modelling analysis. Findings Results indicate that “reasons for” positively correlate with attitude and intention towards socially responsible engagement. Contrarily, “Reasons against” demonstrated a positive association with socially responsible engagement intention. Attitudes favouring socially responsible engagement correlate positively with the underlying intention. The moderation analysis underscores the positive relation of social return on social media with consumers’ attitude and their “reasons for” leaning towards socially responsible engagement intention. Notably, a positive connection was established between socially responsible engagement intention and the trifecta of consumption, contribution and content creation behaviours. Originality/value By enhancing the BRT, this research sheds light on novel perspectives regarding consumers’ engagement on social media platforms. Distinctively, it is among the handful of studies probing the influence of behavioural intention across diverse behavioural outcomes. The insights gained from this study, grounded in empirical evidence from an emerging market, are poised to guide policymakers, governmental agencies and industry practitioners in formulating effective strategies to combat plastic pollution. Additionally, the study can assist in achieving the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs), specifically SGD 12, SGD 13, SDG 14 and SGD 17.","PeriodicalId":47615,"journal":{"name":"Social Responsibility Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Responsibility Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-12-2022-0530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Plastic pollution is a major issue that plagues modern society. Scholars are interested in comprehending consumers’ behavioural actions to address plastic pollution. This study aims to delve into the determinants of consumers’ engagement with social media as a medium to address plastic pollution. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model is developed that extends the behavioural reasoning theory (BRT). Using a quantitative approach, 476 responses underwent structural equation modelling analysis. Findings Results indicate that “reasons for” positively correlate with attitude and intention towards socially responsible engagement. Contrarily, “Reasons against” demonstrated a positive association with socially responsible engagement intention. Attitudes favouring socially responsible engagement correlate positively with the underlying intention. The moderation analysis underscores the positive relation of social return on social media with consumers’ attitude and their “reasons for” leaning towards socially responsible engagement intention. Notably, a positive connection was established between socially responsible engagement intention and the trifecta of consumption, contribution and content creation behaviours. Originality/value By enhancing the BRT, this research sheds light on novel perspectives regarding consumers’ engagement on social media platforms. Distinctively, it is among the handful of studies probing the influence of behavioural intention across diverse behavioural outcomes. The insights gained from this study, grounded in empirical evidence from an emerging market, are poised to guide policymakers, governmental agencies and industry practitioners in formulating effective strategies to combat plastic pollution. Additionally, the study can assist in achieving the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs), specifically SGD 12, SGD 13, SDG 14 and SGD 17.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索消费者在社交媒体上参与解决塑料污染问题
塑料污染是困扰现代社会的一个主要问题。学者们感兴趣的是了解消费者应对塑料污染的行为行为。本研究旨在深入探讨消费者使用社交媒体作为解决塑料污染的媒介的决定因素。设计/方法/方法一个概念模型被开发,扩展行为推理理论(BRT)。采用定量方法,对476份回复进行结构方程建模分析。结果表明,“原因”与社会责任参与的态度和意向正相关。相反,“反对理由”与社会责任参与意愿呈正相关。支持社会责任参与的态度与潜在意图呈正相关。适度分析强调了社交媒体上的社会回报与消费者的态度以及他们倾向于社会责任参与意愿的“原因”之间的正相关关系。值得注意的是,社会责任参与意愿与消费、贡献和内容创造三要素之间建立了正相关关系。通过加强BRT,本研究揭示了有关消费者参与社交媒体平台的新视角。值得注意的是,它是少数几个探索行为意图对不同行为结果影响的研究之一。从这项研究中获得的见解基于新兴市场的经验证据,有望指导政策制定者、政府机构和行业从业者制定有效的战略来对抗塑料污染。此外,该研究可以帮助实现联合国可持续发展目标(SDG),特别是SGD 12, SGD 13, SDG 14和SGD 17。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Social Responsibility Journal, the official journal of the Social Responsibility Research Network, is interdisciplinary in its scope and encourages submissions from any discipline or any part of the world which addresses any element of the journal''s aims. The journal encompasses the full range of theoretical, methodological and substantive debates in the area of social responsibility. Contributions which address the link between different disciplines and / or implications for societal, organisational or individual behavior are especially encouraged. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical papers, speculative essays and review articles. The journal also publishes special themed issues under the guidance of a guest editor. Coverage: Accountability and accounting- Issues concerning sustainability- Economy and finance- Governance- Stakeholder interactions- Ecology and environment- Corporate activity and behaviour- Ethics and morality- Governmental and trans-governmental regulation- Globalisation and disintermediation- Individuals and corporate citizenship- Transparency and disclosure- Consumption and its consequences- Corporate and other forms of organization
期刊最新文献
Internal CSR and the decline of organised labour: a possible elective affinity? The effect of natural disasters on food security in Sub-Saharan Africa Fighting fire with apathy – understanding managers’ perception of the natural environment as a stakeholder in the aftermath of a natural disaster Sustainable consumption behavior among Bahraini young female consumers Killing two birds with one stone: gender diversity, information disclosures and financial distress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1