Irrigation water quality from wastewater reuse or groundwater sources: bridging the water–nutrient–food nexus

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.390
B. Bharani Baanu, K. S. Jinesh Babu
{"title":"Irrigation water quality from wastewater reuse or groundwater sources: bridging the water–nutrient–food nexus","authors":"B. Bharani Baanu, K. S. Jinesh Babu","doi":"10.2166/aqua.2023.390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A field study is done to analyze the effects of water reuse for irrigation with a focus on seed germination, crop morphology, crop yield, nutritional values of edible parts, fertilizer reduction, and benefit–cost ratio. For the study, three different crops, Lablab bean, tomato, and chilli, are considered and every crop type is irrigated with groundwater (GW), diluted treated wastewater (DTWW), and treated wastewater (TWW). The study reveals that the DTWW is optimal for seed germination. Crops irrigated with the TWW have the highest morphological characteristics. Crop yield is highest for the TWW-irrigated Lablab bean and DTWW-irrigated tomato. Chilli remains unproductive until the end due to thermal stress. Nutritional values of the edible parts of the DTWW- and TWW-irrigated crops are lower than the GW-irrigated crops. Crops irrigated with the DTWW and TWW are applied with the reduced quantities of N, P and K fertilizers. Indeed, even when the dosages are low those crops are able to produce higher yields than the GW-irrigated crops which are applied with full fertilization. As the crop yield is high and fertilizer cost is less, the benefit–cost ratio is higher for water reuse irrigation than the GW irrigation.","PeriodicalId":34693,"journal":{"name":"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society","volume":"85 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A field study is done to analyze the effects of water reuse for irrigation with a focus on seed germination, crop morphology, crop yield, nutritional values of edible parts, fertilizer reduction, and benefit–cost ratio. For the study, three different crops, Lablab bean, tomato, and chilli, are considered and every crop type is irrigated with groundwater (GW), diluted treated wastewater (DTWW), and treated wastewater (TWW). The study reveals that the DTWW is optimal for seed germination. Crops irrigated with the TWW have the highest morphological characteristics. Crop yield is highest for the TWW-irrigated Lablab bean and DTWW-irrigated tomato. Chilli remains unproductive until the end due to thermal stress. Nutritional values of the edible parts of the DTWW- and TWW-irrigated crops are lower than the GW-irrigated crops. Crops irrigated with the DTWW and TWW are applied with the reduced quantities of N, P and K fertilizers. Indeed, even when the dosages are low those crops are able to produce higher yields than the GW-irrigated crops which are applied with full fertilization. As the crop yield is high and fertilizer cost is less, the benefit–cost ratio is higher for water reuse irrigation than the GW irrigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自废水再利用或地下水资源的灌溉水质:桥接水-营养-食物关系
摘要通过田间试验,从种子发芽、作物形态、作物产量、可食用部分营养价值、减肥量和效益成本比等方面分析了回用灌溉的效果。在这项研究中,考虑了三种不同的作物,豆角、番茄和辣椒,每种作物类型都用地下水(GW)、稀释处理废水(DTWW)和处理废水(TWW)灌溉。研究表明,DTWW对种子萌发最有利。灌水后的作物形态特征最高。tww灌溉的青豆和番茄产量最高。由于热应激,辣椒直到最后都没有产出。DTWW灌水和tww灌水作物可食用部分的营养价值低于gw灌水作物。用DTWW和TWW灌溉的作物施用少量的N、P、K肥料。事实上,即使用量很低,这些作物的产量也比施用充分施肥的gw灌溉作物高。由于作物产量高,化肥成本低,水回用灌溉的效益成本比GW灌溉高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biogas production from water lilies, food waste, and sludge: substrate characterization and process performance How suitable is the gold-labelling method for the quantification of nanoplastics in natural water? Corrigendum: AQUA – Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society 72 (7), 1115–1129: Application of system dynamics model for reservoir performance under future climatic scenarios in Gelevard Dam, Iran, Ali Babolhakami, Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi and Alireza Emadi, https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.193 Exploring the rise of AI-based smart water management systems Unraveling air–water two-phase flow patterns in water pipelines based on multiple signals and convolutional neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1