A teacher strategic mindset predicts efficacious and effective teaching

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1080/01443410.2023.2278399
Jessica C. Ng, Qiao Kang Teo, Patricia Chen
{"title":"A teacher strategic mindset predicts efficacious and effective teaching","authors":"Jessica C. Ng, Qiao Kang Teo, Patricia Chen","doi":"10.1080/01443410.2023.2278399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractEfficacious, effective teaching markedly impacts students’ learning and academic achievement. How can we motivate teachers to feel efficacious, and hence teach effectively, amidst challenges? Our research introduced and tested the role of a ‘teacher strategic mindset’—an orientation towards construing teaching challenges as opportunities to step back and consider new, potentially more effective strategies. Teachers who had this strategic mindset felt more efficacious, and in turn, were more likely to report engaging in self-regulated behaviours and metacognition (Study 1). Moreover, instilling this teacher strategic mindset through a brief, online intervention causally increased teachers’ reported efficacy, and their intentions to engage in self-regulated behaviours and metacognition—specifically among those who had a growth mindset (Study 2). Beyond subject matter knowledge and pedagogical skills, a teacher strategic mindset has practical value in motivating efficacious and thus effective teaching.Keywords: Mindsetteachingstrategic mindsetefficacyself-regulation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a Singapore MOE AcRF Tier 1 grant [R-581-000-232-592] and NUS-ALSET research seed grant [A-0001350-04-00] awarded to Patricia Chen. This work followed all ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association and was approved by the ethics committee of the researchers’ university. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":48053,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology","volume":"29 S105","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2278399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractEfficacious, effective teaching markedly impacts students’ learning and academic achievement. How can we motivate teachers to feel efficacious, and hence teach effectively, amidst challenges? Our research introduced and tested the role of a ‘teacher strategic mindset’—an orientation towards construing teaching challenges as opportunities to step back and consider new, potentially more effective strategies. Teachers who had this strategic mindset felt more efficacious, and in turn, were more likely to report engaging in self-regulated behaviours and metacognition (Study 1). Moreover, instilling this teacher strategic mindset through a brief, online intervention causally increased teachers’ reported efficacy, and their intentions to engage in self-regulated behaviours and metacognition—specifically among those who had a growth mindset (Study 2). Beyond subject matter knowledge and pedagogical skills, a teacher strategic mindset has practical value in motivating efficacious and thus effective teaching.Keywords: Mindsetteachingstrategic mindsetefficacyself-regulation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a Singapore MOE AcRF Tier 1 grant [R-581-000-232-592] and NUS-ALSET research seed grant [A-0001350-04-00] awarded to Patricia Chen. This work followed all ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association and was approved by the ethics committee of the researchers’ university. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师的策略思维预示着教学的有效性和有效性
有效的教学对学生的学习和学业成绩有着显著的影响。在挑战中,我们如何激励教师感到有效,从而有效地教学?我们的研究介绍并测试了“教师战略思维”的作用——一种将教学挑战视为退后一步思考新的、可能更有效的策略的机会的倾向。拥有这种战略心态的教师感觉更有效,反过来,更有可能报告参与自我调节行为和元认知(研究1)。此外,通过简短的在线干预灌输这种教师战略心态,会增加教师报告的效能。以及他们参与自我调节行为和元认知的意图——特别是那些拥有成长型思维的人(研究2)。除了学科知识和教学技能之外,教师战略思维在激励有效和有效的教学方面具有实用价值。关键词:心态教学战略心态效能自我规制披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。本研究由新加坡教育部AcRF一级资助[R-581-000-232-592]和NUS-ALSET研究种子资助[a -0001350-04-00]资助给Patricia Chen。这项工作遵循了美国心理协会的所有伦理准则,并得到了研究人员所在大学伦理委员会的批准。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the discussion and rapid dissemination of research findings in psychology relevant to education. The journal places particular emphasis on the publishing of papers reporting applied research based on experimental and behavioural studies. Reviews of relevant areas of literature also appear from time to time. The aim of the journal is to be a primary source for articles dealing with the psychological aspects of education ranging from pre-school to tertiary provision and the education of children with special needs. The prompt publication of high-quality articles is the journal"s first priority. All contributions are submitted "blind" to at least two independent referees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between trait mindfulness and academic performance: a meta-analysis “Wow, you’re really smart!” – How children’s self-esteem affects teachers’ praise Attributions for failure and success at primary school: a person-centered approach to causal dimensions Academic failure and psychological disengagement: can belief in school meritocracy make a difference? Exploring how demographic, adjustment, and online learning readiness related factors shape international students’ online learning anxiety: a hierarchical regression analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1