A Bother or a Benefit? How Contraceptive Users Balance the Trade-Offs Between Preferred Menstrual Bleeding Patterns and Preferred Contraceptive Methods in India, South Africa, and the United States

Amanda A. Shea, Meghana Kulkarni, Jonathan Thornburg, Cécile Ventola, Erin Walker, Virginia J. Vitzthum
{"title":"A Bother or a Benefit? How Contraceptive Users Balance the Trade-Offs Between Preferred Menstrual Bleeding Patterns and Preferred Contraceptive Methods in India, South Africa, and the United States","authors":"Amanda A. Shea, Meghana Kulkarni, Jonathan Thornburg, Cécile Ventola, Erin Walker, Virginia J. Vitzthum","doi":"10.1080/23293691.2023.2267533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contraceptive needs of women for whom the benefits of menstrual bleeding may outweigh its disadvantages have largely been overlooked, especially outside high-income countries. Some providers and researchers have assumed that users of nonhormonal birth control (non-HBC) are misinformed about the positive and negative effects of HBC and/or the need for menstrual bleeding. This study takes the position that many of those rejecting HBC in favor of methods that do not alter bleeding are, in fact, making informed decisions. Using questionnaire data from 4,255 contraceptive users in three countries, we compared current HBC users explicitly open to hormone use (“H-receptive”) and non-HBC users explicitly rejecting hormones (“H-averse”). To the extent that menstrual bleeding attitudes affect contraceptive choice, these two groups should have the greatest contrasts in those attitudes. This novel study design mitigates ambiguities arising from posing hypothetical scenarios to those ambivalent about using hormones or who are not currently using contraception. In all three countries, of those agreeing with the prompt, “I don’t want to change my natural menstrual cycle,” the fractions of H-averse and H-receptive users are disproportionally high and low, respectively (p ≤ .0026). Responses to other prompts varied across populations, revealing complex juxtapositions of multiple criteria, including bleeding preferences, that likely influence contraceptive choices. These patterns, reflecting personal and culturally salient values, highlight the necessity of not assuming that menstrual bleeding is undesirable or relying on a single criterion to ascertain clients’ contraceptive needs and preferences. Rather, acknowledging a client’s personal hierarchy of preferences regarding contraceptive attributes best serves their goals.","PeriodicalId":75331,"journal":{"name":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"134 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2023.2267533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The contraceptive needs of women for whom the benefits of menstrual bleeding may outweigh its disadvantages have largely been overlooked, especially outside high-income countries. Some providers and researchers have assumed that users of nonhormonal birth control (non-HBC) are misinformed about the positive and negative effects of HBC and/or the need for menstrual bleeding. This study takes the position that many of those rejecting HBC in favor of methods that do not alter bleeding are, in fact, making informed decisions. Using questionnaire data from 4,255 contraceptive users in three countries, we compared current HBC users explicitly open to hormone use (“H-receptive”) and non-HBC users explicitly rejecting hormones (“H-averse”). To the extent that menstrual bleeding attitudes affect contraceptive choice, these two groups should have the greatest contrasts in those attitudes. This novel study design mitigates ambiguities arising from posing hypothetical scenarios to those ambivalent about using hormones or who are not currently using contraception. In all three countries, of those agreeing with the prompt, “I don’t want to change my natural menstrual cycle,” the fractions of H-averse and H-receptive users are disproportionally high and low, respectively (p ≤ .0026). Responses to other prompts varied across populations, revealing complex juxtapositions of multiple criteria, including bleeding preferences, that likely influence contraceptive choices. These patterns, reflecting personal and culturally salient values, highlight the necessity of not assuming that menstrual bleeding is undesirable or relying on a single criterion to ascertain clients’ contraceptive needs and preferences. Rather, acknowledging a client’s personal hierarchy of preferences regarding contraceptive attributes best serves their goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻烦还是好处?在印度、南非和美国,避孕药使用者如何权衡首选月经出血模式和首选避孕方法
对于经期出血可能利大于弊的妇女来说,她们的避孕需求在很大程度上被忽视了,特别是在高收入国家之外。一些提供者和研究人员认为,非激素避孕(非HBC)的使用者被误导了关于HBC的积极和消极影响和/或月经出血的必要性。这项研究表明,许多拒绝使用不改变出血的方法的人实际上是在做出明智的决定。使用来自三个国家的4255名避孕药具使用者的问卷数据,我们比较了目前明确接受激素使用的HBC使用者(“h -受体”)和明确拒绝激素使用的非HBC使用者(“h -厌恶”)。就月经出血的态度影响避孕选择的程度而言,这两组在这些态度上应该有最大的差异。这种新颖的研究设计减轻了由于对使用激素或目前没有使用避孕措施的人提出假设情景而产生的歧义。在这三个国家,那些同意提示“我不想改变我的自然月经周期”的人,h -厌恶和h -接受用户的比例分别不成比例地高和低(p≤0.0026)。对其他提示的反应因人群而异,揭示了多种标准的复杂并置,包括出血偏好,可能影响避孕选择。这些模式反映了个人和文化上突出的价值观,强调了不假设月经出血是不可取的或依赖单一标准来确定客户避孕需求和偏好的必要性。相反,承认客户对避孕属性的个人偏好等级最有利于他们的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptation and Reflection in the Transition to Parenthood for Women With Risk Factors for Early Parenting Difficulties Who Participated in the STAR Mums Program A Bother or a Benefit? How Contraceptive Users Balance the Trade-Offs Between Preferred Menstrual Bleeding Patterns and Preferred Contraceptive Methods in India, South Africa, and the United States Healthy Body, Healthy Mind: Exploring the Mental Health Implications of Comprehensive Sex Education Pregnancy Preparation Among Women and Their Partners in the UK: How Common Is It and What Do People Do? Waging War on the Women: A Review of The Trials of Nina McCall: Sex, Surveillance, and the Decades-Long Government Plan to Imprison "Promiscuous" Women Stern, S. W. (2019). The Trials of Nina McCall: Sex, Surveillance, and the Decades-Long Government Plan to Imprison “Promiscuous” Women. Beacon Press. ISBN: 9780807021859, Paperback: $19.00
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1