The response of wildfire regimes to Last Glacial Maximum carbon dioxide and climate

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 ECOLOGY Biogeosciences Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.5194/bg-20-3981-2023
Olivia Haas, Iain Colin Prentice, Sandy P. Harrison
{"title":"The response of wildfire regimes to Last Glacial Maximum carbon dioxide and climate","authors":"Olivia Haas, Iain Colin Prentice, Sandy P. Harrison","doi":"10.5194/bg-20-3981-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Climate and fuel availability jointly control the incidence of wildfires. The effects of atmospheric CO2 on plant growth influence fuel availability independently of climate, but the relative importance of each in driving large-scale changes in wildfire regimes cannot easily be quantified from observations alone. Here, we use previously developed empirical models to simulate the global spatial pattern of burnt area, fire size, and fire intensity for modern and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; ∼ 21 000 ka) conditions using both realistic changes in climate and CO2 and sensitivity experiments to separate their effects. Three different LGM scenarios are used to represent the range of modelled LGM climates. We show large, modelled reductions in burnt area at the LGM compared to the recent period, consistent with the sedimentary charcoal record. This reduction was predominantly driven by the effect of low CO2 on vegetation productivity. The amplitude of the reduction under low-CO2 conditions was similar regardless of the LGM climate scenario and was not observed in any LGM scenario when only climate effects were considered, with one LGM climate scenario showing increased burning under these conditions. Fire intensity showed a similar sensitivity to CO2 across different climates but was also sensitive to changes in vapour pressure deficit (VPD). Modelled fire size was reduced under LGM CO2 in many regions but increased under LGM climates because of changes in wind strength, dry days (DDs), and diurnal temperature range (DTR). This increase was offset under the coldest LGM climate in the northern latitudes because of a large reduction in VPD. These results emphasize the fact that the relative magnitudes of changes in different climate variables influence the wildfire regime and that different aspects of climate change can have opposing effects. The importance of CO2 effects imply that future projections of wildfire must take rising CO2 into account.","PeriodicalId":8899,"journal":{"name":"Biogeosciences","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3981-2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Climate and fuel availability jointly control the incidence of wildfires. The effects of atmospheric CO2 on plant growth influence fuel availability independently of climate, but the relative importance of each in driving large-scale changes in wildfire regimes cannot easily be quantified from observations alone. Here, we use previously developed empirical models to simulate the global spatial pattern of burnt area, fire size, and fire intensity for modern and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; ∼ 21 000 ka) conditions using both realistic changes in climate and CO2 and sensitivity experiments to separate their effects. Three different LGM scenarios are used to represent the range of modelled LGM climates. We show large, modelled reductions in burnt area at the LGM compared to the recent period, consistent with the sedimentary charcoal record. This reduction was predominantly driven by the effect of low CO2 on vegetation productivity. The amplitude of the reduction under low-CO2 conditions was similar regardless of the LGM climate scenario and was not observed in any LGM scenario when only climate effects were considered, with one LGM climate scenario showing increased burning under these conditions. Fire intensity showed a similar sensitivity to CO2 across different climates but was also sensitive to changes in vapour pressure deficit (VPD). Modelled fire size was reduced under LGM CO2 in many regions but increased under LGM climates because of changes in wind strength, dry days (DDs), and diurnal temperature range (DTR). This increase was offset under the coldest LGM climate in the northern latitudes because of a large reduction in VPD. These results emphasize the fact that the relative magnitudes of changes in different climate variables influence the wildfire regime and that different aspects of climate change can have opposing effects. The importance of CO2 effects imply that future projections of wildfire must take rising CO2 into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
末次冰期极大期二氧化碳和气候对野火制度的响应
摘要气候和燃料供应共同控制着野火的发生。大气CO2对植物生长的影响独立于气候影响燃料的可获得性,但两者在推动野火制度大规模变化方面的相对重要性无法仅凭观测轻易量化。在此,我们使用先前开发的经验模型来模拟现代和末次冰期极大期(LGM)的全球燃烧面积、火灾规模和火灾强度的空间格局;利用气候和二氧化碳的实际变化和敏感性实验分离其影响。三种不同的LGM情景用于表示模拟LGM气候的范围。我们显示,与最近时期相比,LGM的燃烧面积大幅减少,与沉积木炭记录一致。这种减少主要是由于低二氧化碳对植被生产力的影响。无论LGM气候情景如何,低co2条件下的减少幅度都是相似的,当只考虑气候影响时,在任何LGM气候情景中都没有观察到减少幅度,其中一个LGM气候情景显示在这些条件下燃烧增加。在不同的气候条件下,火灾强度对二氧化碳表现出相似的敏感性,但对蒸汽压差(VPD)的变化也很敏感。许多地区在低密度CO2气候下模拟火灾规模减小,而在低密度CO2气候下模拟火灾规模增大,这主要是由于风力、干燥日数(dd)和日温差(DTR)的变化。这种增加在北纬最冷的LGM气候下被抵消,因为VPD大幅减少。这些结果强调了这样一个事实,即不同气候变量的相对变化幅度会影响野火状态,而气候变化的不同方面可能产生相反的影响。二氧化碳效应的重要性意味着未来对野火的预测必须考虑到二氧化碳的上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biogeosciences
Biogeosciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeosciences (BG) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications and review papers on all aspects of the interactions between the biological, chemical and physical processes in terrestrial or extraterrestrial life with the geosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere. The objective of the journal is to cut across the boundaries of established sciences and achieve an interdisciplinary view of these interactions. Experimental, conceptual and modelling approaches are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Spatial and seasonal variability in volatile organic sulfur compounds in seawater and the overlying atmosphere of the Bohai and Yellow seas Root distributions predict shrub–steppe responses to precipitation intensity Geographically divergent trends in snow disappearance timing and fire ignitions across boreal North America Driving and limiting factors of CH4 and CO2 emissions from coastal brackish-water wetlands in temperate regions Temporary stratification promotes large greenhouse gas emissions in a shallow eutrophic lake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1