Values-Based Practice: A Theory-Practice Dynamic for Navigating Values and Difference in Health Care

Ashok Handa, Bill (K.W.M.) Fulford
{"title":"Values-Based Practice: A Theory-Practice Dynamic for Navigating Values and Difference in Health Care","authors":"Ashok Handa, Bill (K.W.M.) Fulford","doi":"10.1017/s1358246123000279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This chapter introduces values-based practice as a resource for working with individually diverse values in health and social care, and describes its origins in an on-going development through the resources of philosophy. The chapter is in two main sections. Section I, Values-Based Practice, builds on two brief interactive exercises to introduce and explain the key features of values-based practice. As a relatively recent addition to the range of resources for working with values in health and social care, values-based practice is distinctive in focussing on the diversity of values comprising individual lived experience. Like evidence-based practice, values-based practice is a process-driven rather than an outcome-driven methodology. That is to say, rather than offering prescribed answers, both approaches offer processes that support decision-makers in coming to answers for themselves based on the particular circumstances presented by the situation in question. Although entirely complementary, the processes involved are of course different. Where evidence-based practice relies on meta-analyses of the results of high-quality clinical trials to inform a consensual model of decision-making, values-based practice builds on learnable clinical skills and other process elements to inform a dissensual model of decision-making rather than seeking to overcome value-conflicts in reaching consensus. Working within a premise of mutual respect for differences of values, and guided by three key principles linking values and evidence, values-based practice, as described in the chapter, supports dissensual decision-making, balanced according to the circumstances presented by the decision in question, within frameworks of locally-set frameworks of shared values. Section II, The Theory-Practice Dynamic, then outlines the theory-practice dynamic on which values-based practice is based. The origins of values-based practice in mid-twentieth century ordinary language philosophy of the Oxford School are outlined. As the chapter illustrates, although a limited area of analytic philosophy, many aspects of values-based practice are informed by ordinary language philosophy, ranging from its premise, through the training exercises and other process elements described in Section I, to its role in hybrid empirical studies supporting its model of service delivery. The development of values-based practice, furthermore, as section II goes on to describe, is ongoing, with key initiatives drawing not only on both analytic and Continental traditions of European philosophy, but also on non-European philosophies such as those of Africa and the Caribbean.","PeriodicalId":269662,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246123000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This chapter introduces values-based practice as a resource for working with individually diverse values in health and social care, and describes its origins in an on-going development through the resources of philosophy. The chapter is in two main sections. Section I, Values-Based Practice, builds on two brief interactive exercises to introduce and explain the key features of values-based practice. As a relatively recent addition to the range of resources for working with values in health and social care, values-based practice is distinctive in focussing on the diversity of values comprising individual lived experience. Like evidence-based practice, values-based practice is a process-driven rather than an outcome-driven methodology. That is to say, rather than offering prescribed answers, both approaches offer processes that support decision-makers in coming to answers for themselves based on the particular circumstances presented by the situation in question. Although entirely complementary, the processes involved are of course different. Where evidence-based practice relies on meta-analyses of the results of high-quality clinical trials to inform a consensual model of decision-making, values-based practice builds on learnable clinical skills and other process elements to inform a dissensual model of decision-making rather than seeking to overcome value-conflicts in reaching consensus. Working within a premise of mutual respect for differences of values, and guided by three key principles linking values and evidence, values-based practice, as described in the chapter, supports dissensual decision-making, balanced according to the circumstances presented by the decision in question, within frameworks of locally-set frameworks of shared values. Section II, The Theory-Practice Dynamic, then outlines the theory-practice dynamic on which values-based practice is based. The origins of values-based practice in mid-twentieth century ordinary language philosophy of the Oxford School are outlined. As the chapter illustrates, although a limited area of analytic philosophy, many aspects of values-based practice are informed by ordinary language philosophy, ranging from its premise, through the training exercises and other process elements described in Section I, to its role in hybrid empirical studies supporting its model of service delivery. The development of values-based practice, furthermore, as section II goes on to describe, is ongoing, with key initiatives drawing not only on both analytic and Continental traditions of European philosophy, but also on non-European philosophies such as those of Africa and the Caribbean.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于价值观的实践:一个理论-实践动态导航价值观和医疗保健的差异
本章介绍了以价值观为基础的实践,作为在健康和社会关怀中与个体不同价值观合作的资源,并通过哲学资源描述了其在持续发展中的起源。本章分为两个主要部分。第一部分,基于价值观的实践,以两个简短的互动练习为基础,介绍和解释基于价值观的实践的主要特征。作为在保健和社会护理方面开展价值观工作的资源范围中相对较新的一种资源,基于价值观的做法的独特之处在于侧重于构成个人生活经验的价值观的多样性。与循证实践一样,基于价值观的实践是一种过程驱动的方法,而不是结果驱动的方法。也就是说,这两种方法都不是提供规定的答案,而是提供支持决策者根据所涉局势所呈现的特定情况自行得出答案的过程。虽然完全互补,但所涉及的过程当然是不同的。基于证据的实践依赖于对高质量临床试验结果的荟萃分析,为达成共识的决策模型提供信息,而基于价值观的实践则建立在可学习的临床技能和其他过程要素之上,为达成共识的决策模型提供信息,而不是寻求在达成共识时克服价值冲突。如本章所述,在相互尊重价值观差异的前提下,以价值观和证据相联系的三个关键原则为指导,基于价值观的实践支持不同意见的决策,根据有关决策所呈现的情况,在当地设定的共同价值观框架内进行平衡。第二节,理论-实践动态,然后概述了基于价值观的实践所基于的理论-实践动态。概述了二十世纪中叶牛津学派日常语言哲学中基于价值的实践的起源。正如本章所述,尽管分析哲学的领域有限,但普通语言哲学为基于价值观的实践提供了许多方面的信息,从它的前提,通过培训练习和第一节中描述的其他过程元素,到它在支持其服务交付模型的混合实证研究中的作用。此外,正如第二节继续描述的那样,以价值为基础的实践的发展正在进行中,其关键举措不仅借鉴了欧洲哲学的分析和大陆传统,而且还借鉴了非洲和加勒比等非欧洲哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PHS volume 94 Cover and Front matter ‘The Hermeneutic Problem of Psychiatry’ and the Co-Production of Meaning in Psychiatric Healthcare PHS volume 94 Cover and Back matter Art and the Lived Experience of Pain Notes on the Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1